llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok)
Changes
A new warning -Wdelete-array is issued for the now-accepted delete of an array,
which becomes a pointer to the first element after an array-to-pointer
conversion.
The GNU extension of deleting a void poin
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -Wno-everything -Wunsafe-buffer-usage \
+// RUN:-fsafe-buffer-usage-suggestions \
+// RUN:-verify %s
+
+void char_literal() {
+ if ("abc"[2] == 'c')
+return;
+ if ("def"[3] == '0')
+return;
+}
+
+voi
@@ -420,25 +420,63 @@ AST_MATCHER(ArraySubscriptExpr, isSafeArraySubscript) {
//already duplicated
// - call both from Sema and from here
- const auto *BaseDRE =
- dyn_cast(Node.getBase()->IgnoreParenImpCasts());
- if (!BaseDRE)
+ if (const auto *BaseDRE =
+
https://github.com/haoNoQ edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92432
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MitalAshok wrote:
The array-to-pointer conversion *is* necessary, even if it's impractical to use:
https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.delete#1.sentence-5
> Otherwise, it shall be a prvalue of pointer to object type.
https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.lval#6
> Whenever a glvalue appears as an operand of
nikic wrote:
@MaskRay Thanks! That does fix the regression.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91082
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90849
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tru wrote:
Did you consider the parallel setting as well?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90138
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1230,11 +1230,11 @@ namespace cwg598 { // cwg598: yes
int &t = h(N::i);
}
-namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: partial
+namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: 19
typedef int Fn();
struct S { operator void*(); };
struct T { operator Fn*(); };
- struct U { operator int*(); oper
@@ -1245,12 +1245,7 @@ namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: partial
// expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void'
type 'void *'}}
delete t;
// expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression of type 'T'}}
-// FIXME: This is valid, but is rejected
tstellar wrote:
> Did you consider the parallel setting as well?
Forgot about that part, I will make that change too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90138
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
bcardosolopes wrote:
> What is obvious in the MLIR space is not necessarily what's obvious in Clang;
Sure.
> I have no idea whether that returns a `SourceLocation`, a `PresumedLoc`, a
> `FullSourceLoc`, etc, so I don't think that is a use of `auto` I would want
> to have to reason about as a
@@ -1950,8 +1950,22 @@ ConstantLValueEmitter::tryEmitBase(const
APValue::LValueBase &base) {
if (D->hasAttr())
return CGM.GetWeakRefReference(D).getPointer();
-if (auto FD = dyn_cast(D))
- return CGM.GetAddrOfFunction(FD);
+if (auto FD = dyn_cast(D)) {
joker-eph wrote:
What part of the "camelBack" is visible to the user of the API?
(and in general the method prototype in the header should likely use the same
parameter names as the implementation file)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91007
___
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Changpeng Fang
Date: 2024-05-20T13:37:01-07:00
New Revision: 753f7e814514ddb2bb2fd837549d5958cf0ef343
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/753f7e814514ddb2bb2fd837549d5958cf0ef343
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/753f7e814514ddb2bb2fd837549d5958cf0ef343.diff
https://github.com/changpeng closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dwblaikie wrote:
How's this compare with other implementations clang is trying to be compatible
with (gcc (in the normal clang driver mode) and msvc (in clang-cl mode))? Would
this be an ABI break against them, or is this intended as an ABI fix to align
better with them? Or some third option?
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91770
>From 291412a203ea60465d4ecae9317f3490c59bfb50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 19:53:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [InstallAPI] add JSON option to pass X arguments
---
.../
https://github.com/pogo59 approved this pull request.
I've been persuaded this is the right direction. LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92579
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92674
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
chapuni wrote:
@AaronBallman Thanks. Aha, I've noticed my test was incompatible for targeting
msvc mangling.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91446
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
https://github.com/jroelofs approved this pull request.
Correct, apple-m1 does not have BTI, but BTI is required for v8.5. My mistake.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92600
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
@@ -0,0 +1,592 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fclang-abi-compat=latest
-triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -target-feature +sme2 -target-feature
+sme-f16f16 -t
https://github.com/NuriAmari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92331
>From 66ddf609c0e77867ec48c17136fb80d1e482041d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nuri Amari
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:33:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Run ObjCContractPass in Distributed Thin-LTO Pipeline
Prior t
@@ -101,6 +101,19 @@ class ARCRuntimeEntryPoints {
llvm_unreachable("Switch should be a covered switch.");
}
+ bool moduleContainsARCEntryPoints() {
+assert(TheModule != nullptr && "Not initialized.");
+
+for (auto ARCInstricID :
+ enum_seq_inclusive(Int
NuriAmari wrote:
> it seems like this should just be in the default codegen pipeline? you'd need
> to change the pass to bail out early if there are no relevant intrinsics (by
> checking if the module contains the intrinsic declaration) to not affect
> compile times
I've done this, and remove
https://github.com/ltertan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92827
This patch adds a new option for AArch64, -mno-va-float which can be used to
disable the generation of code that saves FP in variadic functions
>From 3d6a1b5d0bfff6b7ffb444a3fb6a32ea0faceea8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Laurentiu Tertan (ltertan)
Changes
This patch adds a new option for AArch64, -mno-va-float which can be used to
disable the generation of code that saves FP in variadic functions
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Laurentiu Tertan (ltertan)
Changes
This patch adds a new option for AArch64, -mno-va-float which can be used to
disable the generation of code that saves FP in variadic functions
---
Full diff:
ltertan wrote:
@TNorthover
The PR mentions no Reviewers, so I'm adding you. Please help me redirect this
if you're not the right person to review this. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92827
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@
cachemeifyoucan wrote:
> I couldn't find this check you're alluding to, so I added my own. If the
> check does exist, could you point me to it? If not, does mine look
> reasonable? Thanks.
I was answering from my memory, now I have to check. We have this function
`ModuleHasARC` which is used
JonChesterfield wrote:
Aarch64 has a dedicated floating point region in the va_list structure. Is the
intent of this patch to globally disable the use of that, such that clang
should arrange to put floating point values in the stack fallback area instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
.text
#endif
-#if !defined(__USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS__)
+#if !defined(__USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS__) && !defined(__wasm__)
aheejin wrote:
Can I land this? Thank you for your review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92192
__
bcardosolopes wrote:
I encoded the discussion in our clangir.org page, with some speculation on
Aaron's pending replies, happy to change and fix anything. In the future we'll
upstream that too, but for the time being it's here:
https://llvm.github.io/clangir/GettingStarted/coding-guideline.htm
@@ -718,12 +718,16 @@ def ProcessorFeatures {
list AppleA13 = [HasV8_4aOps, FeatureCrypto,
FeatureFPARMv8,
FeatureNEON, FeaturePerfMon,
FeatureFullFP16,
FeatureFP16FML, FeatureSHA3];
+ // Apple A14 a
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92501
>From 87cfc8234e1294dedc103b9bcd2b7d9d31874c4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 23:24:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [webkit.RefCntblBaseVirtualDtor] Ignore a base class
which has a
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92501
>From 87cfc8234e1294dedc103b9bcd2b7d9d31874c4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 23:24:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [webkit.RefCntblBaseVirtualDtor] Ignore a base class
which has
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NuriAmari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92331
>From 66ddf609c0e77867ec48c17136fb80d1e482041d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nuri Amari
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:33:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Run ObjCContractPass in Distributed Thin-LTO Pipeline
Prior t
efriedma-quic wrote:
Bot is unreliable, so copy-pasting:
> ⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to
> contribute to the repo.
Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://github.com/settings/emails) setting in your account.
See [LLVM
Discourse](https:/
NuriAmari wrote:
I've added the check back in, and reverted my custom check. There is too much
going on in https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808 for me to quickly understand
everything, but I don't see an obvious reason the check needed to be removed.
@ahatanaka Please let me know if I'm missing so
https://github.com/cachemeifyoucan approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92331
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JonChesterfield created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
None
>From b08088ddb37d2a03d321e3256ae19328dd7c502e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Chesterfield
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 23:07:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64][NFC] Use ptrmask for vaarg stack align
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Jon Chesterfield (JonChesterfield)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/AArch64.cpp (+1-12)
- (modified) clang/test/CodeGen/aarc
https://github.com/NuriAmari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92331
>From 66ddf609c0e77867ec48c17136fb80d1e482041d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nuri Amari
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:33:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Run ObjCContractPass in Distributed Thin-LTO Pipeline
Prior t
https://github.com/rniwa created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92837
Exempt CRTP (Curiously Recurring Template Pattern) classes with a delete
operation acting on "this" pointer with an appropriate cast from the
requirement that a ref-countable superclass must have a virtual destruct
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92501
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rniwa wrote:
Closing this PR in favor of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92837,
which has a single consolidated commit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92501
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Exempt CRTP (Curiously Recurring Template Pattern) classes with a delete
operation acting on "this" pointer with an appropriate cast from the
requirement that a ref-countable superclass must have a virtual des
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Exempt CRTP (Curiously Recurring Template Pattern) classes with a delete
operation acting on "this" pointer with an appropriate cast from the
requirement that a ref-countable superclass must
efriedma-quic wrote:
This patch, as proposed, doesn't seem like a good idea: it's very likely to
miscompile user code without any diagnostic. Are you sure you don't want one of
the following?
- A soft-float ABI (-mabi=aapcs-soft)
- Completely forbidding the use of floating-point values (-mgene
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
Please don't use "NFC" markings for patches that change the emitted IR, even if
it doesn't significantly impact the resulting assembly in most cases.
That said, LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
___
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Check that -fcf-protection does not get passed to the device-side
MaskRay wrote:
We also have unsupported-option-gpu.c to test various ignored options for GPU.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88402
_
https://github.com/aaupov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92713
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JonChesterfield edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aaupov closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92713
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JonChesterfield wrote:
Dropped the NFC tag from the commit message. The machine code is expected to be
the same or negligibly better, this patch makes some tests more legible for a
different patch. Thanks for the quick review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
___
MaskRay wrote:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-nolock-and-noalloc-attributes/76837/75
contains a discussion about the subproject name.
Do you have opinions? @llvm/pr-subscribers-sanitizer @compnerd @petrhosek
@isanbard
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
_
Author: Heejin Ahn
Date: 2024-05-20T18:43:13-07:00
New Revision: d1aca0ae2e0c52298966e35e4312e21045d4c6e4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1aca0ae2e0c52298966e35e4312e21045d4c6e4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1aca0ae2e0c52298966e35e4312e21045d4c6e4.diff
LO
https://github.com/aheejin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92604
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aheejin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92840
We've decided to change `__USING_WASM_EXCEPTIONS__` preprocessor to
`__WASM_EXCEPTIONS__` given that it's more concise.
>From e04e685a8fbf3e7915a9eaff3798fe77d15aab0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heejin Ahn
D
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxxabi
Author: Heejin Ahn (aheejin)
Changes
We've decided to change `__USING_WASM_EXCEPTIONS__` preprocessor to
`__WASM_EXCEPTIONS__` given that it's more concise.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92840.diff
6 Files Affecte
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841
etc (NFC),
>From 4711f9f61fd35f3388f665a396f95951ee4b3f5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 09:10:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use StringRef::find_first_of(char), etc (NFC)
https://github.com/kazutakahirata edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-core
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/utils/TableGen/ClangDiagnosticsEmitter.cpp (+1-1)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Support/LockFile
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/utils/TableGen/ClangDiagnosticsEmitter.cpp (+1-1)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Support/LockF
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 00179e92c147e16de1f7c653f88c8805aef820c1
e04e685a8fbf3e7915a9eaff3798fe77d15aab0c --
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-05-21T09:47:05+08:00
New Revision: 8ce2045be0ce708af0bfce5dc14632fa15dc743a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ce2045be0ce708af0bfce5dc14632fa15dc743a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ce2045be0ce708af0bfce5dc14632fa15dc743a.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92385
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2024-05-20T22:49:53-03:00
New Revision: 4cebe5a43ba83eab477358ef4da665b43463bb68
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4cebe5a43ba83eab477358ef4da665b43463bb68
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4cebe5a43ba83eab477358ef4da665b43463bb68.dif
https://github.com/FreddyLeaf updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
>From 41fbc18c7a4a26b11bc4b772bbe2e384ad9d9dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Freddy Ye
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 16:29:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [X86] Support EGPR for inline assembly.
"jR": explictly enabl
FreddyLeaf wrote:
[4d1ad30](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338/commits/4d1ad3090416cda320c88f1ddc0937b5749e64b4)
moved but not merged. These two constraints will behavior different under
-mattr=+egpr.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/923
Author: Jon Chesterfield
Date: 2024-05-21T03:22:20+01:00
New Revision: b2d7d72ff2408dcc27048e08d50ac719ff03a89e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2d7d72ff2408dcc27048e08d50ac719ff03a89e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2d7d72ff2408dcc27048e08d50ac719ff03a89e.di
https://github.com/JonChesterfield closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -14674,6 +14676,31 @@ static bool TryEvaluateBuiltinNaN(const ASTContext
&Context,
return true;
}
+// Checks that the value x is in the range (-1;-0.5], [0.5; 1)
+static bool isInFrexpResultRange(const llvm::APFloat &x) {
+ llvm::APFloat minusOne(x.getSemantics(), "-1.
@@ -6,17 +6,21 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc-ibm-aix -mlong-double-64 -emit-llvm -o - %s
| FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc64-ibm-aix -mlong-double-64 -emit-llvm -o -
%s | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s
+long double input = 0.0L;
https://github.com/hubert-reinterpretcast edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hubert-reinterpretcast edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92682
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+//===- SemaRISCV.h --- RISC-V target-specific routines
===//
topperc wrote:
I think header files are supposed to have `-*- C++ -*-` on this line
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92682
__
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-05-20T20:32:18-07:00
New Revision: 1c58208d899285318c89e069268145c85ec33368
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1c58208d899285318c89e069268145c85ec33368
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1c58208d899285318c89e069268145c85ec33368.diff
LOG:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Jon Chesterfield (JonChesterfield)
Changes
Replace variadic functions with equivalent functions taking a va_list. This
composes with optimisations like inlining to give zero cost variadics.
Sched
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
// REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -target-feature +neon -emit-llvm -O2 -o -
%s | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -target-feature +neon -emit-llvm -O2 -o -
%s -mllvm -expand-variadics-override=disable | Fi
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 560c2fd3d427a5e2dc2361abde1142f3fda40253
15061bfbc2dc06de5bac32628389386cadaa5632 --
jyknight wrote:
Please update the constraint code list
https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#supported-constraint-code-list with any new
codes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
Author: Brandon Wu
Date: 2024-05-21T11:50:04+08:00
New Revision: 64aafd6908e3aa36c4504bc10f8d9fc819513f6c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64aafd6908e3aa36c4504bc10f8d9fc819513f6c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64aafd6908e3aa36c4504bc10f8d9fc819513f6c.diff
LO
https://github.com/4vtomat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92644
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JonChesterfield wrote:
[inline-then-fold-variadics.cpp](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92850/commits/15061bfbc2dc06de5bac32628389386cadaa5632#diff-0a9893e04ae7e0a5692ad93dfb73d6efa992953f7e9eebb68c1a3f4acd457e1e)
is the motivating example for optimisation - simple variadic functions a
@@ -1554,13 +1554,13 @@
// CHECK-ZVKT-EXT: __riscv_zvkt 100{{$}}
// Experimental extensions
-// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
-// RUN: -march=rv32i_zaamo0p2 -E -dM %s \
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 \
4vtomat wrote:
https://github.com/4vtomat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91556
>From 062d7d5017b01fb3afbaffe1a34487cfe36288d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brandon Wu
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 21:43:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Bump Zaamo and Zalrsc to version 1.0
The ratified inform
https://github.com/4vtomat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91556
>From 062d7d5017b01fb3afbaffe1a34487cfe36288d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brandon Wu
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 21:43:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [RISCV] Bump Zaamo and Zalrsc to version 1.0
The ratified inform
Author: Brandon Wu
Date: 2024-05-21T12:04:46+08:00
New Revision: 8be079cdddfd628d356d9ddb5ab397ea95fb1030
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8be079cdddfd628d356d9ddb5ab397ea95fb1030
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8be079cdddfd628d356d9ddb5ab397ea95fb1030.diff
LO
https://github.com/4vtomat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91556
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yamt wrote:
> Hmm... I'm not sure this meets our requirements for inclusion as an
> attribute. The semantics of this are pretty opaque, no obvious significant
> motivation/applicability in the base languages, etc. There doesn't seem to be
> any reasonable use case that I can see.
do you mean
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91770
>From 291412a203ea60465d4ecae9317f3490c59bfb50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 19:53:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [InstallAPI] add JSON option to pass X arguments
---
.../
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852
This is an enabler for a future patch.
>From 22964061e46ef0d37904f6c8e757dca9800c5cd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 00:39:55 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] NFCI: use Temp
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
This is an enabler for a future patch.
---
Patch is 26.46 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852.diff
25 Files Affe
301 - 400 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
