yamt wrote: > Hmm... I'm not sure this meets our requirements for inclusion as an > attribute. The semantics of this are pretty opaque, no obvious significant > motivation/applicability in the base languages, etc. There doesn't seem to be > any reasonable use case that I can see.
do you mean my use case is not reasonable? or it isn't well explained? or something else? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92499 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
