https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90948
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-05-07T09:10:29+02:00
New Revision: fc866fd2a2cfca6d62f48dcf83778959fd24f559
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fc866fd2a2cfca6d62f48dcf83778959fd24f559
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fc866fd2a2cfca6d62f48dcf83778959fd24f559.diff
LO
https://github.com/hokein closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90948
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/maribu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91258
>From 182b64a1737d15646a70e5132aa906153b74e7d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Buschsieweke
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 20:42:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [MSP430][Clang] Update list of MCUs
This updates the lis
https://github.com/maribu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91258
>From 182b64a1737d15646a70e5132aa906153b74e7d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Buschsieweke
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 20:42:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [MSP430][Clang] Update list of MCUs
This updates the lis
maribu wrote:
Thx for the suggestion.
I interpreted `Target/MSP430` as relative to where the definitions are; was
this correct?
My experience with LLVM is limited to using it, so I do not really know my way
around :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91258
___
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
d0be944aa51194145cd15c987af67489f735059d...6d2759a81ff7c3e88fd2098c1e49d41e2426fa24
clang
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
d0be944aa51194145cd15c987af67489f735059d...768cdb82749df69e21db874323cdc472c1714619
clang
tbaederr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90588
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91303
This adds a `MemberPointer` class along with a `PT_MemberPtr` primitive type.
A `MemberPointer` has a `Pointer` Base as well as a `Decl*` (could be
`ValueDecl*`?) decl it points to.
For the actual logic, this
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+
+
+#include "MemberPointer.h"
+#include "Context.h"
+#include "FunctionPointer.h"
+#include "Program.h"
+#include "Record.h"
+
+namespace clang {
+namespace interp {
+
+std::optional MemberPointer::toPointer(const Context &Ctx) const {
+ if (!Dcl || isa(Dcl))
+
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
This adds a `MemberPointer` class along with a `PT_MemberPtr` primitive type.
A `MemberPointer` has a `Pointer` Base as well as a `Decl*` (could be
`ValueDecl*`?) decl it points to.
For the actual logic, th
martinboehme wrote:
> > In summary, if the storage locations for two pointers are the same, we can
> > return a true literal for the comparison, but if the storage locations are
> > different, we need to return an atom.
>
> I am wondering, if it would make sense to "fix up" the state when we d
https://github.com/maribu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91258
>From 182b64a1737d15646a70e5132aa906153b74e7d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Buschsieweke
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 20:42:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [MSP430][Clang] Update list of MCUs
This updates the lis
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88266
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Stylie777 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90614
>From fa5d76b2d6d095abad76d892e59751727ac2e556 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jack Styles
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:17:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [NFC] Add Extension Lookup to AArch64TargetParser
Currently,
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
martinboehme wrote:
CI failure (DataFlowSanitizer-x86_64 :: release_shadow_space.c) looks unrelated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75170
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-05-07T10:12:23+02:00
New Revision: f3fbd21fa4e25496725c22d987e4e47e4c39c8b0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3fbd21fa4e25496725c22d987e4e47e4c39c8b0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3fbd21fa4e25496725c22d987e4e47e4c39c8b0.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75170
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/philnik777 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91306
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90842
>From 4cbb2ae74abba0cff20d2c9018680c7bcc743316 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 09:59:16 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][Sema] Fix malformed AST for anonymous class
acc
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 09327efdf0f02c4f865a4536db96cac539bb1c01
25ab7acb3de4abaf6ad72eab3fa52227920f8518 --
martinboehme wrote:
> Thank you for this fix.
>
> You should reference the issue that this fixes in your summary.
There isn't currently a github issue for this. Should I create one?
> This also need a release note.
Added. How does this look? (Is it in the appropriate section?)
https://github
martinboehme wrote:
> > This is the option I've decided to go with here. There's a slight wrinkle
> > in that we create a LookupResult that claims we looked up the unnamed field
> > for the anonymous class -- even though we would obviously never be able to
> > look up an unnamed field. I think
martinboehme wrote:
> Another possibility to consider: when [transforming a member
> access](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ff210b94d449de8ebe1f32cf0d7763ba63b27b39/clang/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h#L11950),
> strip off any implicit member accesses from the base expression before
> tra
martinboehme wrote:
> Note there is a `BuildAnonymousStructUnionMemberReference`, I am not sure it
> solves your problem.
Thanks. The issue with this is that it requires an `IndirectFieldDecl` to call
it, and that's hard to get at -- see also my response to @zygoloid.
https://github.com/llvm/
Author: ostannard
Date: 2024-05-07T09:17:05+01:00
New Revision: 1fd196c8df8e9fa4e0ec92b012824d8d1b0b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1fd196c8df8e9fa4e0ec92b012824d8d1b0b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1fd196c8df8e9fa4e0ec92b012824d8d1b0b.diff
LOG
https://github.com/ostannard closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90832
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jthackray approved this pull request.
LGTM. (You've still got a few FIXMEs in AArch64SchedOryon.td, I assume you know
about these)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91022
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
@@ -85,6 +85,10 @@ def SMEUnsupported : AArch64Unsupported {
SME2Unsupported.F);
}
+def MTEUnsupported : AArch64Unsupported {
+ let F = [HasMTE];
+}
+
jthackray wrote:
Oh yes. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91022
___
https://github.com/jthackray edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91022
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tmatheson-arm wrote:
Thanks for the comments everyone. Given that this requires an IR break and
additions to the importer, and there is still some question about which way to
go with the renaming (i.e. FEAT_ names or user-facing names) I think it makes
sense to defer renaming until later. For
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Keenuts updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88918
From 94d76dcdfac88d1d50fe705406c0280c33766e15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Nathan=20Gau=C3=ABr?=
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:05:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][SPIR-V] Always add convervence intri
https://github.com/banach-space edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/banach-space approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
banach-space wrote:
[nit] Once you have more than one prefix, `CHECK` becomes noise. At least IMHO
😅 (we all know that these are "check" lines). You could use more descriptive
prefixes instead, e.g. `CHECK-PORT` -> `PORTABILITY` (it wasn't obvious to me
that
@@ -3101,3 +3130,68 @@ CodeGenFunction::GenerateCapturedStmtFunction(const
CapturedStmt &S) {
return F;
}
+
+namespace {
+// Returns the first convergence entry/loop/anchor instruction found in |BB|.
+// std::nullptr otherwise.
+llvm::IntrinsicInst *getConvergenceToken(llvm
https://github.com/rpereira-dev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91145
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rpereira-dev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91145
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90894
>From 40365147f7aabeaaefd7e9bf6f2b96d6f7135992 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 10:53:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Refactor: Extract the core deduction-guide construction
implement
@@ -261,6 +261,13 @@ AG ag = {1};
// CHECK: | `-BuiltinType {{.*}} 'int'
// CHECK: `-ParmVarDecl {{.*}} 'int'
+template
+using BG = G;
+BG bg(1.0);
+// CHECK-LABEL: Dumping
+// CHECK: FunctionTemplateDecl {{.*}} implicit
+// CHECK: |-CXXDeductionGuideDecl {{.*}} 'a
@@ -2803,7 +2803,207 @@ getRHSTemplateDeclAndArgs(Sema &SemaRef,
TypeAliasTemplateDecl *AliasTemplate) {
return {Template, AliasRhsTemplateArgs};
}
-// Build deduction guides for a type alias template.
+// Build deduction guides for a type alias template from the given unde
https://github.com/goussepi approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91021
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -261,6 +261,13 @@ AG ag = {1};
// CHECK: | `-BuiltinType {{.*}} 'int'
// CHECK: `-ParmVarDecl {{.*}} 'int'
+template
+using BG = G;
+BG bg(1.0);
+// CHECK-LABEL: Dumping
+// CHECK: FunctionTemplateDecl {{.*}} implicit
+// CHECK: |-CXXDeductionGuideDecl {{.*}} 'a
@@ -3850,6 +3850,7 @@ LangOptions getFormattingLangOpts(const FormatStyle
&Style) {
// the sequence "<::" will be unconditionally treated as "[:".
// Cf. Lexer::LexTokenInternal.
LangOpts.Digraphs = LexingStd >= FormatStyle::LS_Cpp11;
+ LangOpts.RawStringLiterals = Lexi
https://github.com/mejedi created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91310
When BPF object files are linked with bpftool, every symbol must be accompanied
by BTF info. Ensure that extern functions referenced by global variable
initializers are included in BTF.
The primary motivation is
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Nick Zavaritsky (mejedi)
Changes
When BPF object files are linked with bpftool, every symbol must be accompanied
by BTF info. Ensure that extern functions referenced by global variable
initializers are included in BTF.
The primar
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Nick Zavaritsky (mejedi)
Changes
When BPF object files are linked with bpftool, every symbol must be accompanied
by BTF info. Ensure that extern functions referenced by global variable
initializers are included in BTF.
The primary motiva
https://github.com/mejedi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91310
>From e518bdfb86b06fa8bc447934293623a803a7f630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Zavaritsky
Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 10:20:52 +
Subject: [PATCH] [BPF] Fix linking issues in static map initializers
When BPF obj
john-brawn-arm wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85665
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mejedi wrote:
CC @yonghong-song
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ char f_int_4(char x) { return x; }
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} fp128 @f_ld(fp128 noundef %x)
long double f_ld(long double x) { return x; }
+// Empty struct is lowered as a placeholder word parameter.
+struct empty {};
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i64 @f_
@@ -7963,6 +7967,148 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+ExprResult Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, FunctionEffectMode
&Mode,
+ bool RequireC
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -verify -x c -std=c23 %s
Sirraide wrote:
Prototypeless functions are the only thing I can think of as well candidly.
https://githu
@@ -3731,7 +3730,7 @@ static const struct Extension {
{"sme-lutv2", {AArch64::FeatureSME_LUTv2}},
{"sme-f8f16", {AArch64::FeatureSMEF8F16}},
{"sme-f8f32", {AArch64::FeatureSMEF8F32}},
-{"sme-fa64", {AArch64::FeatureSMEFA64}},
+{"sme-fa64", {AArch64::Feature
@@ -291,15 +290,14 @@ inline constexpr ExtensionInfo Extensions[] = {
{"tme", AArch64::AEK_TME, "+tme", "-tme", FEAT_INIT, "", 0},
{"wfxt", AArch64::AEK_NONE, {}, {}, FEAT_WFXT, "+wfxt", 550},
{"gcs", AArch64::AEK_GCS, "+gcs", "-gcs", FEAT_INIT, "", 0},
-{"fpmr"
https://github.com/revane updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88735
>From 64c1b5b7d6c29c86e0e7f26f0eff3b7a52f95e7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Edwin Vane
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 09:30:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Refactor how NamedDecl are renamed
The handling of rena
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89358
>From bf6acda6c7cb9a08b82b149c0df38d90e395f9e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:54:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] CTAD: implement the missing IsDeducible
constraint for a
hokein wrote:
> > I agree with you -- having a well-described diagnostic message is better
> > and clearer. I'm happy to improve it once we settle on the final
> > implementation approach (the current diagnostic because
> > '__is_deducible(AFoo, Foo)' evaluated to false seems okay to me. GCC a
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91316
For some callers (see change in DataflowAnalysis.h), this is more convenient.
>From abb7d53778394a220353deeeb86fbd06bf4352c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:23:16 +00
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
For some callers (see change in DataflowAnalysis.h), this is more convenient.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91316.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Analysis/F
https://github.com/pointhex created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91317
It allows to control of error output for the function.
>From 74a0053509564a10faf335c32211cf3dddef4e98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Sokolovskii
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 12:27:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Cla
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: None (pointhex)
Changes
It allows to control of error output for the function.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91317.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Format/Format.h (+2-1)
- (mod
@@ -261,6 +261,13 @@ AG ag = {1};
// CHECK: | `-BuiltinType {{.*}} 'int'
// CHECK: `-ParmVarDecl {{.*}} 'int'
+template
+using BG = G;
+BG bg(1.0);
+// CHECK-LABEL: Dumping
+// CHECK: FunctionTemplateDecl {{.*}} implicit
+// CHECK: |-CXXDeductionGuideDecl {{.*}} 'a
Author: Chris Copeland
Date: 2024-05-07T11:48:30+01:00
New Revision: 651bdb96b16d4e522f4611b60103234b1f890b24
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/651bdb96b16d4e522f4611b60103234b1f890b24
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/651bdb96b16d4e522f4611b60103234b1f890b24.diff
https://github.com/ostannard closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88287
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@chrisnc Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a build,
https://github.com/budimirarandjelovicsyrmia updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70024
From 75ec541cdf717931afe70abc412cb1747f84e0d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: budimirarandjelovicsyrmia
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:20:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Catch missing format attribut
Author: Donát Nagy
Date: 2024-05-07T13:06:11+02:00
New Revision: 97dd8e3c4f38ef345b01fbbf0a2052c7875ff7e0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/97dd8e3c4f38ef345b01fbbf0a2052c7875ff7e0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/97dd8e3c4f38ef345b01fbbf0a2052c7875ff7e0.diff
LO
https://github.com/NagyDonat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilinpv wrote:
Apologies for quick merge and , thanks for comments. I agree with all of them.
I would prefer to keep the patch and provide fixes on top of it. Let me know if
you want it reverted.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90928
___
cf
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90974
From 9ed06c41127c88b3e2e8596ddd83b42ab2856f61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 16:13:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Use explicit call description mode
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Donát Nagy (NagyDonat)
Changes
This commit explicitly specifies the matching mode (C library function, any
non-method function, or C++ method) for the `CallDescription`s constructed in
va
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff fc7e74e879f37301edd9450d3bbf0fec620
@@ -149,26 +149,34 @@ class BlockInCriticalSectionChecker : public
Checker {
private:
const std::array MutexDescriptors{
MemberMutexDescriptor(
- CallDescription(/*QualifiedName=*/{"std", "mutex", "lock"},
+ CallDescription(/*MatchAs=*/CDM::CXXMethod,
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90974
From 9ed06c41127c88b3e2e8596ddd83b42ab2856f61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 16:13:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [analyzer] Use explicit call description mode
Author: Donát Nagy
Date: 2024-05-07T13:48:02+02:00
New Revision: 6d64f8e1feee014e72730a78b62d9d415df112ff
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6d64f8e1feee014e72730a78b62d9d415df112ff
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6d64f8e1feee014e72730a78b62d9d415df112ff.diff
LO
https://github.com/NagyDonat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90974
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91320
We may want code to call this that doesn't know which specific solver
implementation it is dealing with.
>From bdd1d2698f3e592bf4ec33a6ff56be661ff4afb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: T
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
We may want code to call this that doesn't know which specific solver
implementation it is dealing with.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91320.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modi
https://github.com/hahnjo closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/smithp35 commented:
There was a previous attempt at doing something similar with more global
registers r6-r11 in https://reviews.llvm.org/D68862 based on
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128706.html
This got reverted, and unfortunately didn't get picked
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88963
>From bcffb80bba2a6f9ce9eddad61b99a3e59a58f8a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:36:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang][Sema] Improve support for explicit
speciali
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88963
>From 01db101ca28f26181dfedeaef1ec49a5ae42ee99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:36:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang][Sema] Improve support for explicit
speciali
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yetingk wrote:
@zmodem very thank you for the help.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89727
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91316
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91316
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -209,6 +221,9 @@ class DataflowAnalysisContext {
using DenseMapInfo::isEqual;
};
+ DataflowAnalysisContext(Solver &S, std::unique_ptr OwnedSolver,
ymand wrote:
Please add comments either here or on the fields relating S and OwnedSolver.
https://git
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91316
>From abb7d53778394a220353deeeb86fbd06bf4352c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:23:16 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][dataflow] Allow `DataflowAnalysisContext` to use
@@ -209,6 +221,9 @@ class DataflowAnalysisContext {
using DenseMapInfo::isEqual;
};
+ DataflowAnalysisContext(Solver &S, std::unique_ptr OwnedSolver,
martinboehme wrote:
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91316
___
yetingk wrote:
@pogo59 Thank you for the advise. I will update the test cases.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89727
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91316
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
martinboehme wrote:
@ymand PTAL -- I noticed that my initial version had a use-after-move on this
line:
```cxx
DataflowAnalysisContext(std::unique_ptr S,
Options Opts = Options{
/*ContextSensitiveOpts=*/std::nullopt,
martinboehme wrote:
CI failure (DataFlowSanitizer-x86_64 :: release_shadow_space.c) looks unrelated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-05-07T14:58:57+02:00
New Revision: 66364e65405d4964709e67574abf1b519a55296c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/66364e65405d4964709e67574abf1b519a55296c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/66364e65405d4964709e67574abf1b519a55296c.diff
1 - 100 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
