================
@@ -7963,6 +7967,148 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+ExprResult Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, FunctionEffectMode
&Mode,
+ bool RequireConstexpr) {
+ // see checkFunctionConditionAttr, Sema::CheckCXXBooleanCondition
+ if (RequireConstexpr || !CondExpr->isTypeDependent()) {
+ ExprResult E = PerformContextuallyConvertToBool(CondExpr);
+ if (E.isInvalid())
+ return E;
+ CondExpr = E.get();
+ if (RequireConstexpr || !CondExpr->isValueDependent()) {
+ llvm::APSInt CondInt;
+ E = VerifyIntegerConstantExpression(
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
> Is there a way at this time to detect that the expression is not only
> dependent but an unexpanded pack?
Iirc pack dependence is a thing. You should be able to check for that.
> If I add void g() { f<true, false>(); } there is a second attempt to resolve
> the expression but it is still dependent, so clearly there is an error here
I’ll have to check how we currently handle these cases because I’m not terribly
familiar w/ packs myself.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
