[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -4003,20 +4003,11 @@ class TreeTransform { return getSema().CreateRecoveryExpr(BeginLoc, EndLoc, SubExprs, Type); } - StmtResult RebuildOpenACCComputeConstruct(OpenACCDirectiveKind K, -SourceLocation BeginLoc, -

[clang] [Clang][Sema] Fix the lambda call expression inside of a type alias declaration (PR #82310)

zyn0217 wrote: > Still crash on > > ```c++ > template constexpr auto x = F(); > template constexpr int a() { return 1; } > > template > struct A { > using Func = decltype( > [](T) { > return x<[] constexpr { return a(); }>; > // return x<[] constexpr { return b(); }>; >

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -11077,16 +11077,65 @@ OMPClause *TreeTransform::TransformOMPXBareClause(OMPXBareClause *C) { //===--===// // OpenACC transformation //===--

[clang] [clang] Add CodeGen tests for CWG 6xx issues (PR #87876)

https://github.com/erichkeane edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87876 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Add CodeGen tests for CWG 6xx issues (PR #87876)

https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87876 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Add CodeGen tests for CWG 6xx issues (PR #87876)

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o - -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes CHECK +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o - -fexcept

[clang] [Sema][NFC] Cleanups after 843cc474f (PR #87996)

https://github.com/zyn0217 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87996 I forgot to tidy up these lines that should've been done in the previous commit, specifically: 1. Merge two `CodeSynthesisContext`s into one in `CheckTemplateIdType`. 2. Remove some gratuitous `Sema::` specifier

[clang] [Sema][NFC] Cleanups after 843cc474f (PR #87996)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217) Changes I forgot to tidy up these lines that should've been done in the previous commit, specifically: 1. Merge two `CodeSynthesisContext`s into one in `CheckTemplateIdType`. 2. Remove some gratuitous `Sema::` speci

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Allow renaming macro arguments (PR #87792)

revane wrote: @AaronBallman What do you think? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87792 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang][Sema] Avoid guessing unexpanded packs' size in getFullyPackExpandedSize (PR #87768)

https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87768 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] rename designated initializers (PR #86976)

revane wrote: @AaronBallman Ready to go? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86976 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] XFAIL clang/Driver/test/compress.c on AIX (PR #87269)

@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ +// XFAIL: system-aix + // REQUIRES: zlib +// XFAIL: target={{.*}}-aix{{.*}} alisonzhang4 wrote: That seems correct, I've removed `// XFAIL: target={{.*}}-aix{{.*}}` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87269 _

[libclc] [libclc] Fix a couple of issues preventing in-tree builds (PR #87505)

frasercrmck wrote: > ``` > set( spv_suffix ${arch_suffix}.spv ) > add_custom_command( OUTPUT "${spv_suffix}" > COMMAND ${LLVM_SPIRV} ${spvflags} -o "${spv_suffix}" > ${builtins_opt_lib_tgt} > DEPENDS ${builtins_link_lib_tgt} ) > ``` > > I think that ought to be `DEPE

[libclc] [libclc] Fix a couple of issues preventing in-tree builds (PR #87505)

rjodinchr wrote: > > ``` > > set( spv_suffix ${arch_suffix}.spv ) > > add_custom_command( OUTPUT "${spv_suffix}" > > COMMAND ${LLVM_SPIRV} ${spvflags} -o "${spv_suffix}" > > ${builtins_opt_lib_tgt} > > DEPENDS ${builtins_link_lib_tgt} ) > > ``` > > > > > > > >

[libclc] [libclc] Fix a couple of issues preventing in-tree builds (PR #87505)

frasercrmck wrote: > > > ``` > > > set( spv_suffix ${arch_suffix}.spv ) > > > add_custom_command( OUTPUT "${spv_suffix}" > > > COMMAND ${LLVM_SPIRV} ${spvflags} -o "${spv_suffix}" > > > ${builtins_opt_lib_tgt} > > > DEPENDS ${builtins_link_lib_tgt} ) > > > ``` > > >

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

https://github.com/erichkeane created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87998 After discussion with a few others, and seeing the state of our concepts support, I believe it is worth trying to see if we can update this for Clang19. The forcing function is that libstdc++'s header is gu

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Erich Keane (erichkeane) Changes After discussion with a few others, and seeing the state of our concepts support, I believe it is worth trying to see if we can update this for Clang19. The forcing function is that libstdc++'s

[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [clangd] Collect comments from function definitions into the index (PR #67802)

ckandeler wrote: ping https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67802 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [clangd] Allow "move function body out-of-line" in non-header files (PR #69704)

ckandeler wrote: ping https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69704 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -11077,16 +11077,65 @@ OMPClause *TreeTransform::TransformOMPXBareClause(OMPXBareClause *C) { //===--===// // OpenACC transformation //===--

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -82,22 +119,22 @@ bool SemaOpenACC::ActOnStartStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K, return diagnoseConstructAppertainment(*this, K, StartLoc, /*IsStmt=*/true); } -StmtResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnEndStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K, -

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -37,6 +37,32 @@ bool diagnoseConstructAppertainment(SemaOpenACC &S, OpenACCDirectiveKind K, } return false; } + +bool doesClauseApplyToDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind DirectiveKind, +OpenACCClauseKind ClauseKind) { + switch (ClauseKind) {

[libclc] f46f646 - [libclc] Fix spirv build dependencies

Author: Fraser Cormack Date: 2024-04-08T15:48:15+01:00 New Revision: f46f6465062bd6ddc96e3838c50e1a0f85f92dd4 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f46f6465062bd6ddc96e3838c50e1a0f85f92dd4 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f46f6465062bd6ddc96e3838c50e1a0f85f92dd4.diff

[libclc] [libclc] Fix a couple of issues preventing in-tree builds (PR #87505)

frasercrmck wrote: > > > > ``` > > > > set( spv_suffix ${arch_suffix}.spv ) > > > > add_custom_command( OUTPUT "${spv_suffix}" > > > > COMMAND ${LLVM_SPIRV} ${spvflags} -o "${spv_suffix}" > > > > ${builtins_opt_lib_tgt} > > > > DEPENDS ${builtins_link_lib_tgt} ) > > >

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

https://github.com/erichkeane updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821 >From ca5f957bb002d79997e630cdf1aaad5703ea2ba4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: erichkeane Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:53:47 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses Now that we

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -37,6 +37,32 @@ bool diagnoseConstructAppertainment(SemaOpenACC &S, OpenACCDirectiveKind K, } return false; } + +bool doesClauseApplyToDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind DirectiveKind, +OpenACCClauseKind ClauseKind) { + switch (ClauseKind) {

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -11077,16 +11077,65 @@ OMPClause *TreeTransform::TransformOMPXBareClause(OMPXBareClause *C) { //===--===// // OpenACC transformation //===--

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -37,6 +37,32 @@ bool diagnoseConstructAppertainment(SemaOpenACC &S, OpenACCDirectiveKind K, } return false; } + +bool doesClauseApplyToDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind DirectiveKind, +OpenACCClauseKind ClauseKind) { + switch (ClauseKind) {

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -11077,16 +11077,65 @@ OMPClause *TreeTransform::TransformOMPXBareClause(OMPXBareClause *C) { //===--===// // OpenACC transformation //===--

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -82,22 +119,22 @@ bool SemaOpenACC::ActOnStartStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K, return diagnoseConstructAppertainment(*this, K, StartLoc, /*IsStmt=*/true); } -StmtResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnEndStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K, -

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

@@ -110,6 +110,11 @@ C++20 Feature Support templates (`P1814R0 `_). (#GH54051). +- __cpp_concepts macro now updated to `202002L`, as we are confident that, + modulo a handful of bugs and core issues, that our concepts implementation is -

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

@@ -544,16 +544,8 @@ C++20 implementation status https://wg21.link/p0848r3";>P0848R3 - - -Clang 16 (Partial) -Because of other concepts implementation deficits, the __cpp_concepts macro is not yet set to 202002L.

[clang] [clang][NFC] Adjust TBAA Base Info API (PR #73263)

https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request. LGTM, sorry for this falling off my radar! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73263 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

@@ -544,16 +544,8 @@ C++20 implementation status https://wg21.link/p0848r3";>P0848R3 - - -Clang 16 (Partial) -Because of other concepts implementation deficits, the __cpp_concepts macro is not yet set to 202002L.

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Avoid overflow when dumping unsigned integer values (PR #85060)

https://github.com/ealcdan updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85060 >From 12a841c53b5a42fd1954fd81a3aad76c9ccbd45d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Alcaide Nombela Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:28:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Avoid overflow when dumping unsigned intege

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -82,22 +119,22 @@ bool SemaOpenACC::ActOnStartStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K, return diagnoseConstructAppertainment(*this, K, StartLoc, /*IsStmt=*/true); } -StmtResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnEndStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K, -

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -37,6 +37,32 @@ bool diagnoseConstructAppertainment(SemaOpenACC &S, OpenACCDirectiveKind K, } return false; } + +bool doesClauseApplyToDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind DirectiveKind, +OpenACCClauseKind ClauseKind) { + switch (ClauseKind) {

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

https://github.com/HighCommander4 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87998 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[libclc] [llvm] [WIP] Libclc tests (PR #87989)

https://github.com/frasercrmck updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87989 >From b87c2862491aed03f883d6b124a845b0d7c47699 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fraser Cormack Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 16:09:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [libclc] Refactor build system to allow in-tree builds T

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -11077,16 +11077,65 @@ OMPClause *TreeTransform::TransformOMPXBareClause(OMPXBareClause *C) { //===--===// // OpenACC transformation //===--

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -82,22 +119,22 @@ bool SemaOpenACC::ActOnStartStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K, return diagnoseConstructAppertainment(*this, K, StartLoc, /*IsStmt=*/true); } -StmtResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnEndStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K, -

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

https://github.com/erichkeane updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821 >From ca5f957bb002d79997e630cdf1aaad5703ea2ba4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: erichkeane Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:53:47 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses Now that we

[clang] [clang][Sema] Track trivial-relocatability as a type trait (PR #84621)

AaronBallman wrote: > Do you mean that you would reject a proposal that adds Clang-specific trait > (with another name) that implements P1144's semantics? So long as it checks all the boxes in our usual [criteria](https://clang.llvm.org/get_involved.html#criteria) for extensions, I'd see no r

[clang] [clang] Constexpr for __builtin_shufflevector and __builtin_convertvector (PR #76615)

Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= , Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= , Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only %s +// expected-no-diagnostics + +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87998 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] rename designated initializers (PR #86976)

AaronBallman wrote: > @AaronBallman Ready to go? Yup, it was already accepted by the code owners. Based on our chat during office hours, I'm guessing you need help landing these changes. I'll go ahead and land them on your behalf. Feel free to let us know if we accept something and you can't

[clang-tools-extra] 1107b47 - [clang-tidy] rename designated initializers (#86976)

Author: Edwin Vane Date: 2024-04-08T11:22:19-04:00 New Revision: 1107b47dcd145518c7b811bf10e2b848782b0478 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1107b47dcd145518c7b811bf10e2b848782b0478 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1107b47dcd145518c7b811bf10e2b848782b0478.diff LO

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] rename designated initializers (PR #86976)

https://github.com/AaronBallman closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86976 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Avoid overflow when dumping unsigned integer values (PR #85060)

https://github.com/ealcdan updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85060 >From 278a9a649db880c20db19213b93d3470c0b17cd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Alcaide Nombela Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:28:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Avoid overflow when dumping unsigned intege

[clang] [Sema][NFC] Cleanups after 843cc474f (PR #87996)

https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request. Thanks! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87996 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [flang][Frontend] Implement printing defined macros via -dM (PR #87627)

https://github.com/kparzysz updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87627 >From f4917dcf99664442d262226cd1ce1058646d7a55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Krzysztof Parzyszek Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:09:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [flang][Frontend] Implement printing defined macros via

[clang] [clang] Constexpr for __builtin_shufflevector and __builtin_convertvector (PR #76615)

Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= , Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= , Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only %s +// expected-no-diagnostics + +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Allow renaming macro arguments (PR #87792)

https://github.com/AaronBallman commented: I am not certain we want to allow this without some kind of option. The trouble is: the user may not have the ability to change the definition of the macro to be able to appease the check. However, the clang-tidy folks may have different opinions/idea

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Fix shift-exponent ubsan check for signed _BitInt (PR #88004)

https://github.com/bjope created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88004 Commit 5f87957fefb21d454f2f (pull-requst #80515) corrected some codegen problems related to _BitInt types being used as shift exponents. But it did not fix it properly for the special case when the shift count oper

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Fix shift-exponent ubsan check for signed _BitInt (PR #88004)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen Author: Björn Pettersson (bjope) Changes Commit 5f87957fefb21d454f2f (pull-requst #80515) corrected some codegen problems related to _BitInt types being used as shift exponents. But it did not fix it properly fo

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Avoid overflow when dumping unsigned integer values (PR #85060)

https://github.com/ealcdan updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85060 >From 6ca7a38e44f0b666458a1a991d0120c19a4f5fe9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Alcaide Nombela Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:28:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Avoid overflow when dumping unsigned intege

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Avoid overflow when dumping unsigned integer values (PR #85060)

ealcdan wrote: Thanks for the review. I'm adding a test that checks that no '-1' is returned for misc-throw-by-value-catch-by-reference.MaxSize, that should pass even when no value is dumped for the option by default. I also added a test that sets 2⁶⁰ as a value for that option, and checks tha

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Avoid overflow when dumping unsigned integer values (PR #85060)

https://github.com/ealcdan updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85060 >From f6196cf0d073c6637fde463cd4fd3f252051d7da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Alcaide Nombela Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:28:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Avoid overflow when dumping unsigned intege

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request. LGTM, feel free to take or leave my suggestion on the release note. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87998 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.o

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

https://github.com/AaronBallman edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87998 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] Update __cpp_concepts macro (PR #87998)

@@ -110,6 +110,11 @@ C++20 Feature Support templates (`P1814R0 `_). (#GH54051). +- __cpp_concepts macro now updated to `202002L`, as we are confident that, + modulo a handful of bugs and core issues, that our concepts implementation is + suffic

[libclc] [libclc] Fix a couple of issues preventing in-tree builds (PR #87505)

mgorny wrote: Thanks. Unfortunately, I'm still getting a build failure: ``` [1792/1922] cd /tmp/portage/dev-libs/libclc-19.0.0./work/libclc_build && /usr/lib/llvm/17/bin/llvm-spirv --spirv-max-version=1.1 -o spirv-mesa3d-.spv builtins.link.spirv-mesa3d- FAILED: spirv-mesa3d-.spv /tmp/port

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

erichkeane wrote: Build failure is completely unrelated, but I think this does everything you've asked for @alexey-bataev . Let me know what you think! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llv

[libclc] b439140 - [libclc] Fix more spirv build dependencies

Author: Fraser Cormack Date: 2024-04-08T16:51:30+01:00 New Revision: b439140e2982dd77ef28a9069e16ae77bbe2bc5a URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b439140e2982dd77ef28a9069e16ae77bbe2bc5a DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b439140e2982dd77ef28a9069e16ae77bbe2bc5a.diff

[libclc] [libclc] Fix a couple of issues preventing in-tree builds (PR #87505)

frasercrmck wrote: > Thanks. Unfortunately, I'm still getting a build failure: > > ``` > [1792/1922] cd /tmp/portage/dev-libs/libclc-19.0.0./work/libclc_build && > /usr/lib/llvm/17/bin/llvm-spirv --spirv-max-version=1.1 -o spirv-mesa3d-.spv > builtins.link.spirv-mesa3d- > FAILED: spirv-mes

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

https://github.com/alexey-bataev edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request. LG with a nit https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

@@ -1204,15 +1238,16 @@ Parser::OpenACCDirectiveParseInfo Parser::ParseOpenACCDirective() { Diag(Tok, diag::err_expected) << tok::l_paren; } - // Parses the list of clauses, if present. - ParseOpenACCClauseList(DirKind); + // Parses the list of clauses, if present, p

[clang] [PAC][clang] Define `PointerAuthQualifier` and `PointerAuthenticationMode` (PR #84384)

https://github.com/kovdan01 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84384 >From ef23d427b48687b62da9e1062886ddfcc1649b6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John McCall Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:31:25 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Abstract serialization fixes for the Apple Clang changes. ---

[libclc] [libclc] Fix a couple of issues preventing in-tree builds (PR #87505)

mgorny wrote: Yeah, it built this time for me too. Thanks, again! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87505 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [PAC][clang] Define `PointerAuthQualifier` and `PointerAuthenticationMode` (PR #84384)

@@ -138,6 +140,165 @@ using CanQualType = CanQual; #define TYPE(Class, Base) class Class##Type; #include "clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc" +/// Pointer-authentication qualifiers. +class PointerAuthQualifier { + enum : uint32_t { +EnabledShift = 0, +EnabledBits = 1, +Enabl

[clang] [PAC][clang] Define `PointerAuthQualifier` and `PointerAuthenticationMode` (PR #84384)

@@ -138,6 +140,165 @@ using CanQualType = CanQual; #define TYPE(Class, Base) class Class##Type; #include "clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc" +/// Pointer-authentication qualifiers. +class PointerAuthQualifier { + enum : uint32_t { +EnabledShift = 0, +EnabledBits = 1, +Enabl

[clang] [PAC][clang] Define `PointerAuthQualifier` and `PointerAuthenticationMode` (PR #84384)

@@ -138,6 +140,165 @@ using CanQualType = CanQual; #define TYPE(Class, Base) class Class##Type; #include "clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc" +/// Pointer-authentication qualifiers. +class PointerAuthQualifier { + enum : uint32_t { +EnabledShift = 0, +EnabledBits = 1, +Enabl

[clang] [PAC][clang] Define `PointerAuthQualifier` and `PointerAuthenticationMode` (PR #84384)

@@ -138,6 +140,165 @@ using CanQualType = CanQual; #define TYPE(Class, Base) class Class##Type; #include "clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc" +/// Pointer-authentication qualifiers. +class PointerAuthQualifier { + enum : uint32_t { +EnabledShift = 0, +EnabledBits = 1, +Enabl

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

https://github.com/erichkeane updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821 >From ca5f957bb002d79997e630cdf1aaad5703ea2ba4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: erichkeane Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:53:47 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses Now that we

[clang] 26fee0f - [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (#87821)

Author: Erich Keane Date: 2024-04-08T09:05:09-07:00 New Revision: 26fee0ff1251fa70babaf419c08383e7ec71c56c URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/26fee0ff1251fa70babaf419c08383e7ec71c56c DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/26fee0ff1251fa70babaf419c08383e7ec71c56c.diff L

[clang] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses (PR #87821)

https://github.com/erichkeane closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [PAC][clang] Define `PointerAuthQualifier` and `PointerAuthenticationMode` (PR #84384)

@@ -251,15 +423,16 @@ class Qualifiers { } // Deserialize qualifiers from an opaque representation. - static Qualifiers fromOpaqueValue(unsigned opaque) { + static Qualifiers fromOpaqueValue(uint64_t Opaque) { Qualifiers Qs; -Qs.Mask = opaque; +Qs.Mask = uin

[clang] [PAC][clang] Define `PointerAuthQualifier` and `PointerAuthenticationMode` (PR #84384)

kovdan01 wrote: > Are there unittests where we could exercise these types? @Michael137 Could you clarify a bit, what is the correct place for such a unit test? As for `ASTContext` methods similar to newly proposed `getPointerAuthType` (like `getQualifiedType` and `getCVRQualifiedType`), I've

[clang] [PAC][clang] Define `PointerAuthQualifier` and `PointerAuthenticationMode` (PR #84384)

kovdan01 wrote: Although functions in this file use different code styles for function arguments (both `camelCase` and `PascalCase`), I've changed the code style for function arguments of newly added functions to `PascalCase` as described in https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#name-type

[clang] 4d6e67f - Fix build issue committed in 26fee0ff12

Author: erichkeane Date: 2024-04-08T09:08:21-07:00 New Revision: 4d6e67f677bdf40360e6aaba171bcdec93990b01 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d6e67f677bdf40360e6aaba171bcdec93990b01 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d6e67f677bdf40360e6aaba171bcdec93990b01.diff LO

[clang] [RISCV] Disallow target attribute use in multiversioning (PR #85899)

https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request. LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85899 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [analyzer] Variant checker bindings (PR #87886)

https://github.com/NagyDonat commented: Thanks for working on this checker and improving its behavior! I started a review of this commit, but I didn't get too far yet; I'll continue reviewing on the next days. So far I read the code under `Checkers/`and added some minor stylistic remarks, but

[clang] [analyzer] Variant checker bindings (PR #87886)

@@ -265,16 +305,22 @@ class StdVariantChecker : public Checker { } QualType RetrievedCanonicalType = RetrievedType.getCanonicalType(); -QualType StoredCanonicalType = StoredType->getCanonicalType(); -if (RetrievedCanonicalType == StoredCanonicalType) +QualT

[clang] [analyzer] Variant checker bindings (PR #87886)

@@ -51,27 +47,29 @@ removeInformationStoredForDeadInstances(const CallEvent &Call, } template -void handleConstructorAndAssignment(const CallEvent &Call, CheckerContext &C, +bool handleConstructorAndAssignment(const CallEvent &Call, CheckerContext &C,

[clang] [analyzer] Variant checker bindings (PR #87886)

https://github.com/NagyDonat edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87886 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [analyzer] Variant checker bindings (PR #87886)

@@ -231,16 +265,22 @@ class StdVariantChecker : public Checker { // Get the mem region of the argument std::variant and look up the type // information that we know about it. const MemRegion *ArgMemRegion = Call.getArgSVal(0).getAsRegion(); -const QualType *Stor

[clang] [analyzer] Variant checker bindings (PR #87886)

@@ -206,23 +221,42 @@ class StdVariantChecker : public Checker { if (!ThisMemRegion) return; +// Get the first type alternative of the std::variant instance. +assert((ThisSVal.getType(C.getASTContext())->isPointerType() || +ThisSVal.getType(C.getA

[clang] [analyzer] Variant checker bindings (PR #87886)

@@ -286,6 +332,21 @@ class StdVariantChecker : public Checker { C.emitReport(std::move(R)); return true; } + + // TODO Implement modeling of std::variant's emplace method. + // Currently when this method call is encountered we just + // stop the modeling of that st

[clang] [analyzer] Variant checker bindings (PR #87886)

@@ -2261,6 +2261,8 @@ void ExprEngine::Visit(const Stmt *S, ExplodedNode *Pred, Bldr.takeNodes(Pred); const auto *C = cast(S); ExplodedNodeSet dstExpr; + // Point of interes: maybe my cast somehow will not get visited or will NagyDonat wr

[clang] [analyzer] Variant checker bindings (PR #87886)

@@ -206,23 +221,42 @@ class StdVariantChecker : public Checker { if (!ThisMemRegion) return; +// Get the first type alternative of the std::variant instance. +assert((ThisSVal.getType(C.getASTContext())->isPointerType() || +ThisSVal.getType(C.getA

[clang] Fix/interp init list unnamed bitfields (PR #87799)

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +// UNSUPPORTED: asserts +// REQUIRES: asserts +// ^ this attempts to say "don't actually run this test", because it's broken sethp wrote: Sounds good, I'll take a look at it when I get a chance. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87799

[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [clang][modules] Do not resolve `HeaderFileInfo` externally in `ASTWriter` (PR #87848)

https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87848 >From ee56548604be9473f33cd809c901886f37a3d8e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Svoboda Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:12:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][modules] Do not resolve `HeaderFileInfo` externall

[clang] [Doc][HLSL] Add documentation for root signature. (PR #83933)

https://github.com/llvm-beanz requested changes to this pull request. I think we need to break this PR up into different parts going to different places. Documenting the RootSignature grammar and usage in the Clang docs makes sense. I think documentation of the RootSignature binary format prob

[clang] [clang][modules] Only compute affecting module maps with implicit search (PR #87849)

https://github.com/jansvoboda11 ready_for_review https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87849 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang][modules] Only compute affecting module maps with implicit search (PR #87849)

https://github.com/jansvoboda11 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87849 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang][modules] Only compute affecting module maps with implicit search (PR #87849)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules Author: Jan Svoboda (jansvoboda11) Changes When writing out a PCM, we compute the set of module maps that did affect the compilation and we strip the rest to make the output independent of them. The most common way to read a module map th

[clang] [clang][modules] Only compute affecting module maps with implicit search (PR #87849)

jansvoboda11 wrote: CC @ilyakuteev https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87849 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [llvm] [RISCV] Zimop/Zcmop are ratified (PR #87966)

@@ -271,12 +271,6 @@ The primary goal of experimental support is to assist in the process of ratifica ``experimental-ztso`` LLVM implements the `v0.1 proposed specification `__

[clang] Match against all plugins when parsing microsoft attributes (PR #86426)

https://github.com/apache-hb updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86426 >From 245a21512d8658225b17b91b8af4764f54084e01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elliot <35050275+apache...@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:03:47 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Match against all plu

<    1   2   3   4   >