================
@@ -37,6 +37,32 @@ bool diagnoseConstructAppertainment(SemaOpenACC &S,
OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
}
return false;
}
+
+bool doesClauseApplyToDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind DirectiveKind,
+ OpenACCClauseKind ClauseKind) {
+ switch (ClauseKind) {
+ // FIXME: For each clause as we implement them, we can add the
+ // 'legalization' list here.
+ default:
+ // Do nothing so we can go to the 'unimplemented' diagnostic instead.
+ return true;
+ }
+ llvm_unreachable("Invalid clause kind");
+}
+
+/// Destruct and deallocate any clauses that aren't going to be used because
+/// they don't have a Construct to attach to.
+void DestroyUnusedClauses(ASTContext &Ctx,
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Well, there WOULD be no 'ignoring' in codegen, as these clauses won't be added
to the AST at all. They'd be created, then just 'forgotten' if we don't add
them to a construct.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
