@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=alpha.unix.Stream \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.StreamTester \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator.h
@@ -544,6 +545,21 @@ const ExplodedNode
*StreamChecker::getAcquisitionSite(const ExplodedNode *N,
return nullptr;
}
+static ProgramStateRef
+escapeArgs(ProgramStateRef State, CheckerContext &C, const CallEvent &Call,
+ const SmallVector &EscapingArgs) {
--
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=alpha.unix.Stream \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.StreamTester \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator.h
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=alpha.unix.Stream \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.StreamTester \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator.h
@@ -544,6 +545,21 @@ const ExplodedNode
*StreamChecker::getAcquisitionSite(const ExplodedNode *N,
return nullptr;
}
+static ProgramStateRef
+escapeArgs(ProgramStateRef State, CheckerContext &C, const CallEvent &Call,
+ const SmallVector &EscapingArgs) {
+ const a
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=alpha.unix.Stream \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.StreamTester \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator.h
https://github.com/spaits edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/amy-kwan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79252
>From dc55bb565e6f778803604dfaa2874ce1d5fbdc86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amy Kwan
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:19:49 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AIX][TLS] Disallow the use of -maix-small-local-exec-tls
and -f
https://github.com/spaits updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79371
From a27fe8c4179a58a741121eec9e8368c9ab44d7cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Spaits
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:21:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [Sema]Substitue template parameter packs when deduced
from fu
jhuber6 wrote:
> User confusion is only part of the issue here. With any single GPU choice we
> would still potentially produce a nonworking binary, if our GPU choice does
> not match what the user wants.
>
> "all GPUs" has the advantage of always producing the binary that's guaranteed
> to wo
spaits wrote:
@cor3ntin @erichkeane
Thank you for checking the updates on my PR.
I fixed the typo and added the release notes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
@@ -464,7 +466,8 @@ void
RISCVIntrinsicManagerImpl::CreateRVVIntrinsicDecl(LookupResult &LR,
bool RISCVIntrinsicManagerImpl::CreateIntrinsicIfFound(LookupResult &LR,
IdentifierInfo *II,
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79256
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3416,6 +3437,27 @@ llvm::DIMacroFile
*CGDebugInfo::CreateTempMacroFile(llvm::DIMacroFile *Parent,
return DBuilder.createTempMacroFile(Parent, Line, FName);
}
+llvm::DILocation *CGDebugInfo::CreateTrapFailureMessageFor(
+llvm::DebugLoc TrapLocation, StringRef Prefix,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal commented:
> Ouch, that seems to be a nasty issue. Thanks for doing the review and I hope
>
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -221,18 +221,38 @@ int allocaRegion(void) {
return *mem;
}
-int *unknownExtent(int arg) {
- if
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78315
__
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -245,10 +265,15 @@ int *nothingIsCertain(int x, int y) {
if (x >= 2)
return 0;
int *mem = (
https://github.com/felipepiovezan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79230
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/spaits updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79371
From a27fe8c4179a58a741121eec9e8368c9ab44d7cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Spaits
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:21:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] [Sema]Substitue template parameter packs when deduced
from fu
https://github.com/amy-kwan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79252
>From 7e56809d82d1a1f64cee5f88607a0e279e56daca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amy Kwan
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:19:49 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AIX][TLS] Disallow the use of -maix-small-local-exec-tls
and -f
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1385,14 +1385,16 @@ Improvements
- Improved the ``unix.StdCLibraryFunctions`` checker by modeling more
-
koachan wrote:
> Have you checked whether these code models are actually implemented and how
> complete they are? For example, if one model is very far from complete,
> perhaps we should be honest and say it is unsupported.
All three I listed is implemented in some capacity; the one that is th
pirama-arumuga-nainar wrote:
@llvm/clang-vendors Adding clang vendors. FYI, this change expands error
reporting on invalid version numbers to all target triples (This was previously
restricted to Android triples). This can have potential downstream impact.
Please review/test and let us know
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+
+#if !__has_builtin(__builtin_verbose_trap)
+#error
+#endif
ahatanak wrote:
This just makes sure the builtin is supported unconditionally and doesn't
depend on some featu
itf wrote:
@gribozavr, could we merge this fix? As a first-time contributor I think
@chenshanzhi cannot merge it
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78716
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/Bryce-MW updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77964
>From d4c312b9dbf447d0a53dda0e6cdc482bd908430b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bryce Wilson
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 16:01:32 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [X86] Use RORX over SHR imm
---
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86In
Bryce-MW wrote:
I think the fail on Windows is not related. Hopefully a merge fixes it...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77964
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
@@ -3416,6 +3437,27 @@ llvm::DIMacroFile
*CGDebugInfo::CreateTempMacroFile(llvm::DIMacroFile *Parent,
return DBuilder.createTempMacroFile(Parent, Line, FName);
}
+llvm::DILocation *CGDebugInfo::CreateTrapFailureMessageFor(
+llvm::DebugLoc TrapLocation, StringRef Prefix,
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79256
>From be08e64c2c1f433b017185ce78525ad097e609be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:37:04 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UTF
erichkeane wrote:
> @cor3ntin @erichkeane Thank you for checking the updates on my PR. I fixed
> the typo and added the release notes. Also rebased the branch.
Looks like the release notes change failed CI.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79371
___
spaits wrote:
> > @cor3ntin @erichkeane Thank you for checking the updates on my PR. I fixed
> > the typo and added the release notes. Also rebased the branch.
>
> Looks like the release notes change failed CI.
Not my changes. This was commited 3 hours ago:
https://github.com/spaits/llvm-proj
Artem-B wrote:
> I think the semantics of native on other architectures are clear enough here.
I don't think we have the same idea about that. Let's spell it out, so there's
no confusion.
[GCC
manual](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Options.html#index-march-16)
says:
> Using -march=na
@@ -1443,15 +1443,17 @@ Compilation *Driver::BuildCompilation(ArrayRef ArgList) {
const ToolChain &TC = getToolChain(
*UArgs, computeTargetTriple(*this, TargetTriple, *UArgs));
- if (TC.getTriple().isAndroid()) {
-llvm::Triple Triple = TC.getTriple();
-StringR
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78655
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ class Triple {
Cygnus,
CoreCLR,
Simulator, // Simulator variants of other systems, e.g., Apple's iOS
-MacABI, // Mac Catalyst variant of Apple's iOS deployment target.
+MacABI,// Mac Catalyst variant of Apple's iOS deployment target.
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ class Triple {
Callable,
Mesh,
Amplification,
-
+OpenCL,
MaskRay wrote:
I wonder why we need this addition. This is not mentioned in the description.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78655
_
jhuber6 wrote:
> > I think the semantics of native on other architectures are clear enough
> > here.
>
> I don't think we have the same idea about that. Let's spell it out, so
> there's no confusion.
>
> [GCC
> manual](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Options.html#index-march-16)
> sa
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73158
>From 13a26e8e7440c3b501730b22588af393a3e543cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 08:07:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [VPlan] Implement cloning of VPlans.
This patch implements clonin
bwendling wrote:
> > ```c
> > struct x {
> > int a;
> > char foo[2][40];
> > int b;
> > int c;
> > };
> >
> > size_t f(struct x *p, int idx) {
> > return __builtin_dynamic_object_size(&p->foo[idx], 1);
> > }
> > ```
>
> If I'm following correctly, the return here is 0, 40, o
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79191
>From 4c3de9cb4f027d88d254a01bbac81ac8eeafe67d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 13:59:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [ObjC] Defer to the LLV
Artem-B wrote:
> This method of compilation is not like CUDA, so we can't target all the GPUs
> at the same time.
I think this is the key fact I was missing. If the patch is only for a
standalone compilation which does not do multi-GPU compilation in principle,
then your approach makes sense.
https://github.com/DavidGoldman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76466
>From 4caf5b3c779bf18236b4b0be5bc7147d10339f2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Goldman
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 15:59:01 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clangd][SymbolCollector] Treat ObjC methods as spelled
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ class Triple {
Callable,
Mesh,
Amplification,
-
+OpenCL,
ZijunZhaoCCK wrote:
Some cases like
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/amdgpu-alignment.cl#L3
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
jhuber6 wrote:
> > This method of compilation is not like CUDA, so we can't target all the
> > GPUs at the same time.
>
> I think this is the key fact I was missing. If the patch is only for a
> standalone compilation which does not do multi-GPU compilation in principle,
> then your approach
rlavaee wrote:
@boomanaiden154 I appreciate if you could PTAL at llvm-objdump changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74128
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jkorous-apple updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79392
>From dcc2b0c07681b57dbd5a82ce83f5166bb3b9ee09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Korous
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:02:55 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [-Wunsafe-buffer-usage] Fix AST matcher of UUCAddAssignGadget
rlavaee wrote:
@tmsri I appreciate if you could please review the codegen and options part.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74128
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
@@ -431,6 +442,17 @@ namespace deduction_after_explicit_pack {
i(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5); // expected-error {{no match}}
}
+ template
+ void bar(args_tag, type_identity_t..., int mid,
type_identity_t...) {}
spaits wrote:
I added a test for this.
https://
@@ -2694,6 +2852,9 @@ class VPlan {
/// been modeled in VPlan directly.
DenseMap SCEVToExpansion;
+ /// Construct an uninitialized VPlan, should be used for cloning only.
+ explicit VPlan() = default;
+
fhahn wrote:
Removed, thanks!
https://github.com/
@@ -614,6 +614,61 @@ void VPBasicBlock::print(raw_ostream &O, const Twine
&Indent,
printSuccessors(O, Indent);
}
#endif
+static void cloneCFG(VPBlockBase *Entry,
+ DenseMap &Old2NewVPBlocks);
fhahn wrote:
Updated as suggested and renamed
@@ -982,6 +1037,94 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
+ DenseMap &Old2Ne
@@ -982,6 +1037,94 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
+ DenseMap &Old2Ne
@@ -1594,6 +1657,13 @@ class VPWidenPHIRecipe : public VPHeaderPHIRecipe {
addOperand(Start);
}
+ VPRecipeBase *clone() override {
+auto *Res = new VPWidenPHIRecipe(cast(getUnderlyingInstr()),
fhahn wrote:
Changed to `llvm_unreachable`, thanks!
@@ -982,6 +1037,94 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
+ DenseMap &Old2Ne
@@ -614,6 +614,61 @@ void VPBasicBlock::print(raw_ostream &O, const Twine
&Indent,
printSuccessors(O, Indent);
}
#endif
+static void cloneCFG(VPBlockBase *Entry,
+ DenseMap &Old2NewVPBlocks);
+
+static VPBlockBase *cloneVPB(VPBlockBase *BB) {
+ if (auto
@@ -614,6 +614,61 @@ void VPBasicBlock::print(raw_ostream &O, const Twine
&Indent,
printSuccessors(O, Indent);
}
#endif
+static void cloneCFG(VPBlockBase *Entry,
+ DenseMap &Old2NewVPBlocks);
+
+static VPBlockBase *cloneVPB(VPBlockBase *BB) {
+ if (auto
@@ -614,6 +614,61 @@ void VPBasicBlock::print(raw_ostream &O, const Twine
&Indent,
printSuccessors(O, Indent);
}
#endif
+static void cloneCFG(VPBlockBase *Entry,
+ DenseMap &Old2NewVPBlocks);
+
+static VPBlockBase *cloneVPB(VPBlockBase *BB) {
@@ -982,6 +1037,94 @@ void VPlan::updateDominatorTree(DominatorTree *DT,
BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB,
assert(DT->verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Fast));
}
+static void remapOperands(VPBlockBase *Entry, VPBlockBase *NewEntry,
+ DenseMap &Old2Ne
https://github.com/Artem-B approved this pull request.
LGTM, as we can only handle a single GPU target during compilation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
jlebar wrote:
> This method of compilation is not like CUDA, so we can't target all the GPUs
> at the same time.
Can you clarify for me -- what are you compiling where it's impossible to
target multiple GPUs in the binary? I'm confused because Art is understanding
that it's not CUDA, but we
https://github.com/serge-sans-paille created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79502
…initialized array
Fix #79500
>From 9aa54f3f4ecfcf2dad80ec3a57a3d41027356e55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: serge-sans-paille
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:12:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Only set th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: None (serge-sans-paille)
Changes
…initialized array
Fix #79500
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79502.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDecl.cpp (+58-2)
- (modified) clang/test/Cod
serge-sans-paille wrote:
(Extra tests needed)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79502
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jhuber6 wrote:
> > This method of compilation is not like CUDA, so we can't target all the
> > GPUs at the same time.
>
> Can you clarify for me -- what are you compiling where it's impossible to
> target multiple GPUs in the binary? I'm confused because Art is understanding
> that it's not C
https://github.com/serge-sans-paille updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79502
>From e9151018b7a086b167db394caadb74e20dc27711 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: serge-sans-paille
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:12:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Only set the trailing bytes to zero when fi
jlebar wrote:
I...think I understand.
Is the output of this compilation step a cubin, then?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
@@ -27,6 +28,8 @@ class PathDiagnosticLocation;
class BugSuppression {
public:
+ BugSuppression(ASTContext &ACtx) : ACtx(ACtx) {}
haoNoQ wrote:
Hmm I somehow never noticed that we have any actual const-correctness for
`ASTContext`, thanks!
https://github.c
https://github.com/haoNoQ updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79398
>From 21923f92f0ea4169d5fea646221554d4c44e36f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Dergachev
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:52:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [analyzer] Unbreak [[clang::suppress]] on checkers
without
https://github.com/haoNoQ updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79398
>From 21923f92f0ea4169d5fea646221554d4c44e36f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Dergachev
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:52:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [analyzer] Unbreak [[clang::suppress]] on checkers
without
jhuber6 wrote:
> I...think I understand.
>
> Is the output of this compilation step a cubin, then?
Yes, it will spit out a simple `cubin` instead of a fatbinary. The NVIDIA
toolchain is much worse about this stuff than the AMD one, but in general it
works. You can check with `-###` or whateve
jlebar wrote:
Got it, okay, thanks.
Since this change only applies to `--target=nvptx64-nvidia-cuda`, fine by me.
Thanks for putting up with our scrutiny. :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@l
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79239
>From 3725fa4eac3d3d946289d7eb7213f3a1751a2770 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:58:07 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UTF
MaskRay wrote:
"""
This branch is out-of-date with the base branch
Merge the latest changes from main into this branch.
This merge commit will be associated with ...
"""
Hmm. rebase + `spr diff` cannot fix it. I'll merge this manually.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79239
___
jhuber6 wrote:
> Got it, okay, thanks.
>
> Since this change only applies to `--target=nvptx64-nvidia-cuda`, fine by me.
> Thanks for putting up with our scrutiny. :)
No problem, I probably should've have been clearer in my commit messages.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-01-25T15:56:13-06:00
New Revision: 82d335e70f91c03d01a5acfbd0c905abc1cc5b79
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/82d335e70f91c03d01a5acfbd0c905abc1cc5b79
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/82d335e70f91c03d01a5acfbd0c905abc1cc5b79.diff
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8395,10 +8395,11 @@ void Sema::CheckShadow(NamedDecl *D, NamedDecl
*ShadowedDecl,
unsigned WarningDiag = diag::warn_decl_shadow;
SourceLocation CaptureLoc;
- if (isa(D) && isa(ShadowedDecl) && NewDC &&
- isa(NewDC)) {
+ if (isa(D) && NewDC && isa(NewDC)) {
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ahatanak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79230
>From 678cd8ea37f1d02c70fd09b7107542c8301c3bd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:18:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add support for builtin_verbose_trap
The builtin causes th
https://github.com/ahatanak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79230
>From 678cd8ea37f1d02c70fd09b7107542c8301c3bd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:18:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add support for builtin_verbose_trap
The builtin causes th
mtrofin wrote:
> > I haven't checked closely yet, but it seems like you need to add tests.
>
> Could you provide some guidance on what kind of tests to add and how to
> actually run them locally? First I wanted to get the builtkite job to be
> green, but it seems to be failing on some unrelate
@@ -491,17 +491,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
https://github.com/ayalz commented:
Some comments still seem relevant, trying to further clarify.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
@@ -491,17 +491,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
https://github.com/ayalz edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -491,19 +491,41 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
@@ -491,17 +491,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::removeDeadRecipes(VPlan &Plan) {
static VPValue *createScalarIVSteps(VPlan &Plan, const InductionDescriptor &ID,
ScalarEvolution &SE, Instruction *TruncI,
-Type
@@ -2561,6 +2567,70 @@ bool SIMemoryLegalizer::expandAtomicCmpxchgOrRmw(const
SIMemOpInfo &MOI,
return Changed;
}
+bool SIMemoryLegalizer::GFX9InsertWaitcntForPreciseMem(MachineFunction &MF) {
+ const GCNSubtarget &ST = MF.getSubtarget();
+ const SIInstrInfo *TII = ST.get
ldionne wrote:
@DimitryAndric Thanks, please keep us in the loop. If we need to make a fix on
our side, @itrofimow we'll want to cherry-pick it to LLVM 18.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.
https://github.com/mehnadnerd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69685
>From c5ade18c2d22fb9913331b3339955bf56e8c38ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: brs
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:16:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV][MC] MC layer support for the experimental zalasr
extension
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78380
>From e7c3a3fc2a4f5d5714044a1c407bfe56f328680d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ziqing Luo
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:45:01 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [-Wcompletion-handler] Fix a non-termination issue
The Cal
chapuni wrote:
I haven't had a reduced testcase for it, though.
I expect it reproducible with `-fcoverage-mcdc -mllvm -system-headers-coverage`
to build `LLVMSupport`. `clangCodeGen` will crash. (`llvm-cov` crashes w/o
`system-headers-coverage`)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76950
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 29b5f8f977af9b09aa8f56152baca04cf8750981
a4d18e63952e2b47dd97759bebbfd1095b346665 --
https://github.com/krzysz00 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76997
>From 5cc46862df42e7d01a2d45ccc18f221744af0b93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Drewniak
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:20:54 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [SeperateConstOffsetFromGEP] Handle `or disjoint` flags
https://github.com/mehnadnerd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69685
>From c5ade18c2d22fb9913331b3339955bf56e8c38ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: brs
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:16:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV][MC] MC layer support for the experimental zalasr
extension
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78380
>From e7c3a3fc2a4f5d5714044a1c407bfe56f328680d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ziqing Luo
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:45:01 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [-Wcompletion-handler] Fix a non-termination issue
The Cal
@@ -20506,6 +20506,15 @@ unsigned RISCVTargetLowering::getCustomCtpopCost(EVT
VT,
return isCtpopFast(VT) ? 0 : 1;
}
+bool RISCVTargetLowering::shouldInsertFencesForAtomic(
+const Instruction *I) const {
+ if (Subtarget.hasStdExtZalasr()) {
+return false;
+ } else
https://github.com/mehnadnerd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69685
>From c5ade18c2d22fb9913331b3339955bf56e8c38ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: brs
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:16:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV][MC] MC layer support for the experimental zalasr
extension
301 - 400 of 548 matches
Mail list logo
