Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-01-22T21:19:29+01:00
New Revision: 02a28ee8d981b2a8416c50e41c74cb21e73b8340
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02a28ee8d981b2a8416c50e41c74cb21e73b8340
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02a28ee8d981b2a8416c50e41c74cb21e73b8340.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78991
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
Thanks for the patch. This is a great catch!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79041
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
https://github.com/HighCommander4 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78925
>From 47ebe97c199ade54a9538eaed02171d78e6a5a46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 02:45:16 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Limit how much work guessLanguage() can do
@@ -243,6 +247,14 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parse() {
Callback.consumeUnwrappedLine(Line);
}
Callback.finishRun();
+TotalLinesProcessed += Lines.size();
+if ((TotalLinesProcessed / 1) > LastReport) {
HighCommander4 wrote:
My bad, I
pogo59 wrote:
I note that these macros are just name substitutions, unlike the function-style
macros in ia32intrin.h. I didn't change the definitions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79048
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.
Mirko =?utf-8?q?Brkušanin?= ,
Mirko =?utf-8?q?Brkušanin?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -305,6 +305,11 @@ class VOP3OpSel_gfx10 op, VOPProfile p> :
VOP3e_gfx10 {
class VOP3OpSel_gfx11_gfx12 op, VOPProfile p> : VOP3OpSel_gfx10;
+class VOP3FP8OpSel_gfx11_gfx12 op, VOPProfile
mydeveloperday wrote:
While I get this fixes the guessLanguage limitation, if its OOM the I guess
isn't it going to be OOM for any format? (as you mention above), couldn't we
just use the .clang-format-ignore file to say... hey don't bother with this
file, we can't do it...
I feel like this w
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77176
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -350,6 +363,9 @@ _LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE_DEBUG
#define _LIBCPP_ASSERT_PEDANTIC(expression, message)
_LIBCPP_ASSUME(expression)
#define _LIBCPP_ASSERT_INTERNAL(expression, message)
_LIBCPP_ASSUME(expression)
#define _LIBCPP_ASSERT_
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
@philnik777
> Does this actually improve the performance anywhere? AFAICT all we gain is
> avoiding the messages being generated in the binary, but I'm not convinced
> that's much of a problem. e.g. in the `std::next` case, there doesn't s
mmoadeli wrote:
> It would be great to add some tests for local AS null pointers for NVPTX and
> AMDGPU back-ends.
They already have it
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/286ac8f3ea6aec711827ccab9608b010e78b18cf/clang/test/CodeGenSYCL/amd-address-space-conversions.cpp#L24)
https
@@ -3220,6 +3220,25 @@ the configuration (without a prefix: ``Auto``).
+.. _EmptyLinesAfterIncludes:
+
+**EmptyLinesAfterIncludes** (``Unsigned``) :versionbadge:`clang-format 18`
:ref:`¶ `
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
Where do I have to sign up for that knowl
HighCommander4 wrote:
> Can we write a unit test for this?
I'm open to trying but there are a few open questions in my mind:
* Is it fine if the failure mode of a testcase is triggering an OOM?
* Triggering the problematic codepath requires a combination of a large file
(thousands of lines)
carlos4242 wrote:
@owenca ... is this better for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79037
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4831,6 +4848,7 @@ struct FormatStyle {
DerivePointerAlignment == R.DerivePointerAlignment &&
DisableFormat == R.DisableFormat &&
EmptyLineAfterAccessModifier == R.EmptyLineAfterAccessModifier &&
+ EmptyLinesAfterIncludes == R.Empty
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+//===--- IncludesSeparator.cpp ---*- C++ -*-===//
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
Does this have to be done in a separate pass? Couldn't it be done in the normal
formatting?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78957
__
https://github.com/bhamiltoncx created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79051
The code cleanup in #74794 accidentally broke detection of languages by reading
file content from stdin, e.g. via `clang-format -dump-config - <
/path/to/filename`.
This PR adds unit and integration tests t
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77405
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Ben Hamilton (Ben Gertzfield) (bhamiltoncx)
Changes
The code cleanup in #74794 accidentally broke detection of languages by
reading file content from stdin, e.g. via `clang-format -dump-config - <
/path/to/filename`.
This PR adds
@@ -544,28 +544,23 @@ static void PrintVersion(raw_ostream &OS) {
}
// Dump the configuration.
-static int dumpConfig() {
- StringRef FileName;
+static int dumpConfig(bool IsSTDIN) {
std::unique_ptr Code;
- if (FileNames.empty()) {
-// We can't read the code to detect
@@ -135,14 +135,14 @@ void
Thumb1InstrInfo::loadRegFromStackSlot(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
void Thumb1InstrInfo::expandLoadStackGuard(
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MI) const {
MachineFunction &MF = *MI->getParent()->getParent();
- const TargetMachine &TM = MF.getTarget();
@@ -547,18 +547,20 @@ static void PrintVersion(raw_ostream &OS) {
// Dump the configuration.
static int dumpConfig(bool IsSTDIN) {
std::unique_ptr Code;
- // We can't read the code to detect the language if there's no file name.
- if (!IsSTDIN) {
-// Read in the code in
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: clang-format -dump-config - < %s | FileCheck %s
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
I don't think you need this, right? The unit tests does the same, or not?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79051
_
@@ -53,10 +53,9 @@ struct __debug_less {
_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void
__do_compare_assert(long, _LHS&, _RHS&) {}
};
-// Pass the comparator by lvalue reference. Or in debug mode, using a
-// debugging wrapper that stores a reference.
-#if
HighCommander4 wrote:
> couldn't we just use the .clang-format-ignore file to say... hey don't bother
> with this file, we can't do it...
I think that's a good solution for avoiding the OOM when actually trying to
format the file, in combination with this patch for avoiding the OOM in
`guessL
https://github.com/shiltian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78333
>From 2fb901b2379290b162647f0b6d152b93df1b1e7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shilei Tian
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:39:19 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Fix `--save-temps` for OpenCL AoT compilation
We
bwendling wrote:
> @bwendling is there any plan / possibility for simple expressions (with no
> side effects)? Like:
>
> ```c
> struct libusb_bos_dev_capability_descriptor {
> uint8_t bLength;
> uint8_t bDescriptorType;
> uint8_t bDevCapabilityType;
> uint8_t dev_cap
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: clang-format -dump-config - < %s | FileCheck %s
bhamiltoncx wrote:
In this case, we do want two tests (at least, we do need the integration test
in `clang/test/Format/dump-config-objc-stdin.m` to reproduce the issue).
The reason is, the
https://github.com/gulfemsavrun updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79051
>From 893c295ea7ff5fda9953420068fae2af7457c5c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hamilton
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:33:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Format] Fix detection of languages when reading from stdin
https://github.com/bhamiltoncx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79051
>From 893c295ea7ff5fda9953420068fae2af7457c5c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hamilton
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:33:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Format] Fix detection of languages when reading from stdin
-
@@ -547,18 +547,20 @@ static void PrintVersion(raw_ostream &OS) {
// Dump the configuration.
static int dumpConfig(bool IsSTDIN) {
std::unique_ptr Code;
- // We can't read the code to detect the language if there's no file name.
- if (!IsSTDIN) {
-// Read in the code in
https://github.com/zahiraam edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78330
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Zahira Ammarguellat
Date: 2024-01-22T15:50:24-05:00
New Revision: 364a5b5b850a4f3e564da4bde080567a5d1e14d2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/364a5b5b850a4f3e564da4bde080567a5d1e14d2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/364a5b5b850a4f3e564da4bde080567a5d1e14d2
https://github.com/zahiraam closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78330
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -285,6 +289,20 @@ void
NVPTXTargetCodeGenInfo::addNVVMMetadata(llvm::GlobalValue *GV,
bool NVPTXTargetCodeGenInfo::shouldEmitStaticExternCAliases() const {
return false;
}
+
+llvm::Constant *
+NVPTXTargetCodeGenInfo::getNullPointer(const CodeGen::CodeGenModule &CGM,
+
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Julian Schmidt
Date: 2024-01-22T21:51:39+01:00
New Revision: 9f8ccf50dde17adae1368a0cf41edadc8327aaf4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9f8ccf50dde17adae1368a0cf41edadc8327aaf4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9f8ccf50dde17adae1368a0cf41edadc8327aaf4.diff
https://github.com/5chmidti closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Artem-B wrote:
> * Address space cast of nullptr in local_space into a generic_space for the
> CUDA backend.
I think you mean "NVPTX back-end". CUDA is a front-end entity (C++ w/ GPU
extensions)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78759
___
cf
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
Except reported nits, looks fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
ilovepi wrote:
@topperc Is there anything else you think needs to be done for the code
generation?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66915
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
seanm wrote:
@bwendling thanks for your reply. No idea how representative it is of other
projects, but 3 of the 6 flexible arrays in
[libusb](https://github.com/libusb/libusb) structures have these kinds of
non-trivial counts.
The GCC folks seem to have
[considered](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
@@ -283,9 +283,20 @@
// - `_LIBCPP_ASSERT_COMPATIBLE_ALLOCATOR` -- checks any operations that
exchange nodes between containers to make sure
// the containers have compatible allocators.
//
+// - `_LIBCPP_ASSERT_ARGUMENT_WITHIN_DOMAIN` -- checks that the given argument
is w
Author: Jan Patrick Lehr
Date: 2024-01-22T21:59:26+01:00
New Revision: fa4780fa6cc36188b84b2a977ac15351c39d45dd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fa4780fa6cc36188b84b2a977ac15351c39d45dd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fa4780fa6cc36188b84b2a977ac15351c39d45dd.di
https://github.com/jplehr closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76571
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/seranu edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79061
Currently, the UnifiedLTO pipeline seems to have trouble with several
LTO features, like SplitLTO units, which means we cannot use important
optimizations like Whole Program Devirtualization or security hardening
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Paul Kirth (ilovepi)
Changes
Currently, the UnifiedLTO pipeline seems to have trouble with several
LTO features, like SplitLTO units, which means we cannot use important
optimizations like Whole Program Devirtualization or security ha
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -52,204 +51,234 @@
class ComparisonResults {
ldionne wrote:
We need to take the parts of this test that would reproduce an OOB access
inside `std::sort` & friends to a new test file. And that one should be enabled
whenever the valid-element-access checks
@@ -360,11 +365,13 @@ _LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE_DEBUG
#define _LIBCPP_ASSERT_VALID_ELEMENT_ACCESS(expression, message)
_LIBCPP_ASSERT(expression, message)
#define _LIBCPP_ASSERT_NON_NULL(expression, message)
_LIBCPP_ASSERT(expression, message)
#de
https://github.com/ldionne demilestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77176
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66915
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/topperc edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78970
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/topperc requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78970
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1105,7 +1129,7 @@ def FeatureForcedAtomics : SubtargetFeature<
"forced-atomics", "HasForcedAtomics", "true",
"Assume that lock-free native-width atomics are available">;
def HasAtomicLdSt
-: Predicate<"Subtarget->hasStdExtA() || Subtarget->hasForcedAtomics()">;
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ on support follow.
``V``Supported
``Za128rs`` Supported (`See note
<#riscv-profiles-extensions-note>`__)
``Za64rs`` Supported (`See note
<#riscv-profiles-extensions-note>`__)
+ ``Zaamo``Supported
--
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# RUN: not llvm-mc -triple riscv32 -mattr=+experimental-zaamo < %s 2>&1 |
FileCheck %s
topperc wrote:
Is this duplicating existing A test cases? If so can we split the A extension
tests into 2 files as a pre-commit and add these the new Zaamo
Author: Amir Ayupov
Date: 2024-01-22T14:47:42-08:00
New Revision: b83b8d3fd17885438b0ea154e07088d877d293a8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b83b8d3fd17885438b0ea154e07088d877d293a8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b83b8d3fd17885438b0ea154e07088d877d293a8.diff
L
topperc wrote:
Please add "MC" to the title to distinquish from the other patch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78970
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dpaoliello approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79067
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cooperp approved this pull request.
Not code i'm familiar with, but looks like a mechanical change. LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79073
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
efriedma-quic wrote:
I can sort of see how a define could be useful, but this doesn't match any
existing usage of __USER_LABEL_PREFIX__ given the relevant rules. I think
reusing the name is more likely to cause confusion, rather than help anyone.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78913
felix642 wrote:
@11happy I've compiled your code to test it on llvm's project and clang-tidy
seems to sometimes crash. Would you be able to have a look before we merge
this PR ?
```
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and
include the crash backtrace.
Sta
nickdesaulniers wrote:
I think the libc buildbots are now failing as a result of this change. @aaupov
can you PTAL?
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/223/builds/34823
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/225/builds/29950
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69133
__
felix642 wrote:
@PiotrZSL would you be able to commit those changes for me please ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78859
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Amir Ayupov
Date: 2024-01-22T14:56:43-08:00
New Revision: 6953b367027e4234607a6718a0a1d57eb52ef57e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6953b367027e4234607a6718a0a1d57eb52ef57e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6953b367027e4234607a6718a0a1d57eb52ef57e.diff
L
aaupov wrote:
Reverted. Strangely I couldn't repro from
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/225/builds/29950/ the failure locally.
But will get to the bottom of it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69133
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
https://github.com/jkorous-apple approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75669
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
Putting a function in TargetMachine seems reasonable.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76558
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77148
>From 6ba957670ca593094b4545c35801585da2ee02a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ziqingluo-90
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:39:39 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [-Wunsafe-buffer-usage] Add a new warning for use of
two-
https://github.com/rapidsna updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78000
>From 1a17c254ddf09cd4faf5217b2f72da3f44622f8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeoul Na
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:58:16 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [BoundsSafety] Introduce CountAttributedType
CountAttributedType
@@ -89,8 +89,8 @@ RISCVTargetLowering::RISCVTargetLowering(const TargetMachine
&TM,
if ((ABI == RISCVABI::ABI_ILP32F || ABI == RISCVABI::ABI_LP64F) &&
!Subtarget.hasStdExtF()) {
errs() << "Hard-float 'f' ABI can't be used for a target that "
-"doesn
https://github.com/rapidsna updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78000
>From 1a17c254ddf09cd4faf5217b2f72da3f44622f8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeoul Na
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:58:16 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [BoundsSafety] Introduce CountAttributedType
CountAttributedType
Author: Alex Voicu
Date: 2024-01-23T00:55:59Z
New Revision: 907f2a0927d94d72d59f27e411c595b95aa673e9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/907f2a0927d94d72d59f27e411c595b95aa673e9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/907f2a0927d94d72d59f27e411c595b95aa673e9.diff
LOG: [H
https://github.com/AlexVlx closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78915
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++20 -verify %s
jcsxky wrote:
Sorry, I am afraid that I misunderstand root cause of this issue and still need
more working on it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78896
___
https://github.com/AtariDreams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79081
gcc-14 will now throw a warning if size and elements are swapped.
>From 104cef5e78448fd0a15a077f4cc1b9be9f340aad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri,
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79081
>From bda35bd77adc4b137a8e9c8dab1f58f233db6c7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 16:57:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Size and element number
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-pgo
Author: AtariDreams (AtariDreams)
Changes
gcc-14 will now throw a warning if size and elements are swapped.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79081.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/A
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff d4933b3241f463871cae55bbeec8563e7ffe03a2
bda35bd77adc4b137a8e9c8dab1f58f233db6c7c --
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79081
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79081
>From e10238c4801df03f869db835eac160f5cff66937 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 16:57:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Size and element number
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69498
>From 6f89b118ed56ad7a3af1996e19ccd30cc893c51e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:49:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [libc++] Fix the behavior of throwing `operator new`
under
4vtomat wrote:
Since it only reduces about 160 of 54100 intrinsics generated, I have no
opinion on this, just left the final decision to others~
But if this PR is finally decided to be merged, please add some comments around
the code you added to explain, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79081
>From 1155a5d6cc94a9c0b923487d7653be0cd0484d2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 16:57:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC] Size and element
https://github.com/kuhar approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74153
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-01-22T18:59:08-08:00
New Revision: 3b171cb968b3f8495b096139fc57ff6263727e40
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b171cb968b3f8495b096139fc57ff6263727e40
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b171cb968b3f8495b096139fc57ff6263727e40.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78921
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79048
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77699
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Gedare Bloom
Date: 2024-01-22T19:01:16-08:00
New Revision: 4ef646eab3023b52ce8ee529d16605c92caba8ba
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ef646eab3023b52ce8ee529d16605c92caba8ba
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ef646eab3023b52ce8ee529d16605c92caba8ba.diff
501 - 600 of 673 matches
Mail list logo
