@@ -2587,15 +2587,17 @@ struct ConvertConstructorToDeductionGuideTransform {
: ParamTy->isRValueReferenceType() ? VK_XValue
: VK_PRValue);
}
-
-ParmVarDecl *NewParam = ParmVarDecl::Cr
@@ -105,6 +106,161 @@ static void specializeForLoopForUnrolling(ForOp op) {
op.erase();
}
+/// Create a new for loop for the remaining iterations (partialIteration)
+/// after a for loop has been peeled. This is followed by correcting the
+/// loop bounds for both loops give
https://github.com/muneebkhan85 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77328
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -24,11 +24,6 @@ class Y {
void k() &&; // expected-error{{cannot overload a member function with
ref-qualifier '&&' with a member function without a ref-qualifier}}
};
-struct GH76358 {
AaronBallman wrote:
Why remove this test?
https://github.com/llvm/
@@ -24,11 +24,6 @@ class Y {
void k() &&; // expected-error{{cannot overload a member function with
ref-qualifier '&&' with a member function without a ref-qualifier}}
};
-struct GH76358 {
cor3ntin wrote:
Completely accidental, i did not notice...
https:/
https://github.com/seranu edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77918
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kparzysz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77759
>From 62f31654ec66fe0e2a27200d0484d3c70d4ce2c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 15:12:04 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Flang][OpenMP] Separate creation of work-sharing and
https://github.com/muneebkhan85 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77328
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -15845,8 +15845,10 @@ void Sema::CheckCoroutineWrapper(FunctionDecl *FD) {
RecordDecl *RD = FD->getReturnType()->getAsRecordDecl();
if (!RD || !RD->getUnderlyingDecl()->hasAttr())
return;
- // Allow `get_return_object()`.
- if (FD->getDeclName().isIdentifier() &&
+
https://github.com/usx95 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
>From 3e0d0ab6c4fc6cba68285816a95e423bc18e8e55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:11:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [coroutines] Detect lifetime issues with coroutine
lambda cap
https://github.com/usx95 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
>From 3e0d0ab6c4fc6cba68285816a95e423bc18e8e55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:11:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [coroutines] Detect lifetime issues with coroutine
lambda cap
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78139
>From e0eb639c9830599e184aec428164de0b2fb38b71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:17:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Only compare template params of potential
overload
@@ -1259,6 +1259,40 @@ static bool IsOverloadOrOverrideImpl(Sema &SemaRef,
FunctionDecl *New,
if ((OldTemplate == nullptr) != (NewTemplate == nullptr))
return true;
+ // Is the function New an overload of the function Old?
+ QualType OldQType = SemaRef.Context.getCano
jhuber6 wrote:
LLVM changes look unrelated, it was originally copied from OpenBSD it seems.
But it's not a major issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78139
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang --target=aarch64-none-linux-gnu -march=armv9-a+sme -O3 -S
-Xclang -verify %s
+
+// Conflicting attributes when using always_inline
+__attribute__((always_inline)) __arm_locally_streaming
+int inlined_fn_local(void) {
+return 42;
+}
---
@@ -812,6 +819,23 @@ Address AArch64ABIInfo::EmitMSVAArg(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
Address VAListAddr,
/*allowHigherAlign*/ false);
}
+void AArch64TargetCodeGenInfo::checkFunctionCallABI(
+CodeGenModule &CGM, SourceLocation CallLoc, const FunctionDec
@@ -15845,8 +15845,10 @@ void Sema::CheckCoroutineWrapper(FunctionDecl *FD) {
RecordDecl *RD = FD->getReturnType()->getAsRecordDecl();
if (!RD || !RD->getUnderlyingDecl()->hasAttr())
return;
- // Allow `get_return_object()`.
- if (FD->getDeclName().isIdentifier() &&
+
https://github.com/muneebkhan85 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77328
>From 91418f78aad0c994a49e9305516bd6bbb3d69d65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Muneeb Khan
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 23:52:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] [MLIR][LLVM] Add Continuous Loop Peeling transform to
SC
banach-space wrote:
I am not too fond of this.
The current design has taken quite some effort and a few discussions to land in
its current form. Also, Flang has gained proper documentation for this:
*
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/flang/docs/FlangDriver.md#linker-driver
This
AtariDreams wrote:
> LLVM changes look unrelated, it was originally copied from OpenBSD it seems.
> But it's not a major issue.
I did that for consistency. If needed I could split into other PRs
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe
@@ -3145,7 +3138,7 @@ bool Sema::ParseSVEImmChecks(
return HasError;
}
-static ArmStreamingType getArmStreamingFnType(const FunctionDecl *FD) {
+Sema::ArmStreamingType Sema::getArmStreamingFnType(const FunctionDecl *FD) {
sdesmalen-arm wrote:
I don't think
@@ -812,6 +819,24 @@ Address AArch64ABIInfo::EmitMSVAArg(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
Address VAListAddr,
/*allowHigherAlign*/ false);
}
+void AArch64TargetCodeGenInfo::checkFunctionCallABI(
+CodeGenModule &CGM, SourceLocation CallLoc, const FunctionDec
AtariDreams wrote:
> LLVM changes look unrelated, it was originally copied from OpenBSD it seems.
> But it's not a major issue.
FWIW I opened a few PRs in FreeBSD regarding this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing
@@ -10056,7 +10056,7 @@ CodeGenFunction::getSVEOverloadTypes(const SVETypeFlags
&TypeFlags,
llvm::Type *DefaultType = getSVEType(TypeFlags);
- if (TypeFlags.isOverloadWhile())
+ if (TypeFlags.isOverloadWhile() || TypeFlags.isOverloadMultiVecCvt())
sdesma
https://github.com/muneebkhan85 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77328
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AtariDreams wrote:
@jhuber6 Oh you meant the formatting. clang-format did that for some reason. I
did not edit the body at all.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.
jhuber6 wrote:
> > LLVM changes look unrelated, it was originally copied from OpenBSD it
> > seems. But it's not a major issue.
>
> FWIW I opened a few PRs in FreeBSD regarding this.
Yeah, go ahead and move that portion there so the people who know more about
LLVM's regex can look at it compa
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78163
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-01-15T16:08:22+01:00
New Revision: 12e425d0cf9bca072c7b2138e50acbc5f1cd818c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/12e425d0cf9bca072c7b2138e50acbc5f1cd818c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/12e425d0cf9bca072c7b2138e50acbc5f1cd818c.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -812,6 +819,24 @@ Address AArch64ABIInfo::EmitMSVAArg(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
Address VAListAddr,
/*allowHigherAlign*/ false);
}
+void AArch64TargetCodeGenInfo::checkFunctionCallABI(
+CodeGenModule &CGM, SourceLocation CallLoc, const FunctionDec
Author: Sam Tebbs
Date: 2024-01-15T15:12:48Z
New Revision: f112cafa1f180f5fcb8fd2fd238c8615872d1329
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f112cafa1f180f5fcb8fd2fd238c8615872d1329
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f112cafa1f180f5fcb8fd2fd238c8615872d1329.diff
LOG: [Cl
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77338
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AtariDreams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
martinboehme wrote:
Closing the loop: My logic for `flowConditionAllows()` was wrong. If the flow
condition is contradictory, `flowConditionAllows(true) == false`, so the
early-out was wrong.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77453
___
cfe-co
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
>From d11eeea09dffc9692534023f071e2779ce452997 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 14:09:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Libc] Give more functi
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
>From 14e0a7827011527a8e9a638d1ad6c2a25d0d608e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 14:09:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Libc] Give more functi
Author: Yusra Syeda
Date: 2024-01-15T10:18:07-05:00
New Revision: d85df3f2d6e8687c44e6802dcc0e59c14ff32c9b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d85df3f2d6e8687c44e6802dcc0e59c14ff32c9b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d85df3f2d6e8687c44e6802dcc0e59c14ff32c9b.diff
L
https://github.com/ysyeda closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76073
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
> @petrhosek @ldionne would it be better detect libunwind in
> LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES?
I added a check in CMake here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77991.
The error message should now be clearer than previously.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77687
@@ -2871,7 +2871,7 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/472.html";>472
drafting
Casting across protected inheritance
-Not resolved
+No
AaronBallman wrote:
I don't think we should read tea leaves
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
>From e96e055b9e9a9d33ae3eb85174113fcc08c7c341 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 14:09:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Libc] Give more functi
AtariDreams wrote:
@jhuber6 Alright I removed the llvm/Support changes for the sake of the PR
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-co
https://github.com/jhuber6 approved this pull request.
Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -15845,8 +15845,10 @@ void Sema::CheckCoroutineWrapper(FunctionDecl *FD) {
RecordDecl *RD = FD->getReturnType()->getAsRecordDecl();
if (!RD || !RD->getUnderlyingDecl()->hasAttr())
return;
- // Allow `get_return_object()`.
- if (FD->getDeclName().isIdentifier() &&
+
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MDevereau created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78169
Create some multiclasses for FMLA/FMLS, MLAL and MLSL to reduce the size of
arm_sme.td
>From 651facb641b57d8cd019b35d0912499d558bdc08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Devereau
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:21:
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77294
>From 5f6a91cd7f709a3c94c65dc4ea41b5967b9fe343 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:14
kadircet wrote:
I am not sure if this is a viable solution in the long term as LLVM don't
really use BOMs in the sources (a quick scan shows only 4 files with BOMs),
hence these changes can easily be overridden without someone noticing.
Any reason you can't configure MSVC to treat all of the L
https://github.com/AtariDreams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
>From 7130633a84b2e483105ed6057a2c5daa04ad4d64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 14:09:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Libc] Give more functi
AtariDreams wrote:
Ready!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78172
This saves having to assemble the set of constraints and run the SAT solver in
the trivial case of `flowConditionImplies(true)` or
`flowConditionAllows(false)`.
This is an update / reland of my previous reve
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
This saves having to assemble the set of constraints and run the SAT solver in
the trivial case of `flowConditionImplies(true)` or
`flowConditionAllows(false)`.
This is an update / reland of my previous reverted
https://github.com/AtariDreams edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1157,19 +1156,16 @@ existed.
#if foo
#endif foo // warning: extra tokens at end of #endif directive
- #pragma clang diagnostic push
- #pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wextra-tokens"
+ #pragma GCC diagnostic push
+ #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wextra-tokens"
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
>From b452e5cb2493ef41c1019a9b44f7638bb09ebb6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 14:09:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [libc] Give more functi
https://github.com/11happy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
>From 1883d987b2f83adaef05fdb47ae25c7b06582a64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 11happy
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:02:46 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/17] Add readability check to suggest replacement of
conditional stat
AtariDreams wrote:
Ready!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
11happy wrote:
@PiotrZSL I have added the suggested changes except that include one, can you
please help me regarding that include one as I was unable to find any
clang-tidy check which does similar include thing, can you provide me any
reference material where I can read about it or can you t
https://github.com/mydeveloperday created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78176
No need to add an extract space if merging the characters doesn't cause a
problem, hence ) and ! as well as ( do not require the extraneous space.
Fixes #78166
>From 9d29ad06ff71b855a43f57b339990e41f206
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: MyDeveloperDay (mydeveloperday)
Changes
No need to add an extract space if merging the characters doesn't cause a
problem, hence ) and ! as well as ( do not require the extraneous space.
Fixes #78166
---
Full diff: https://github
tblah wrote:
I agree that the documentation says not to do this, but existing common build
configurations are doing it anyway. For example, building netcdf-parallel
(https://github.com/Parallel-NetCDF/PnetCDF) using spack (https://spack.io/).
netcdf-parallel uses autotools. I haven't tried ano
=?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine?= Constantin,
=?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine?= Constantin,
=?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine?= Constantin,
=?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine?= Constantin,
=?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine?= Constantin,
=?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine?= Constantin,
=?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine?= Constantin
@@ -1157,19 +1156,16 @@ existed.
#if foo
#endif foo // warning: extra tokens at end of #endif directive
- #pragma clang diagnostic push
- #pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wextra-tokens"
+ #pragma GCC diagnostic push
+ #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wextra-tokens"
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75590
>From 2823e9e9e32aeb2efe08e1b8b64b0fc7e8c408a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:11:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Interp] Implement integral->complex cast
https://github.com/bryanpkc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75516
>From 581947adad14826e023731d9b7aa6e4161b46949 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qi Hu
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:35:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [TargetParser] Define AEK_FCMA and AEK_JSCVT for tsv110
We define AEK_J
https://github.com/jamesETsmith edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Qi Hu
Date: 2024-01-15T10:56:37-05:00
New Revision: 2eb71e8b142a0d099cef668fd84ffc4c1c508d60
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2eb71e8b142a0d099cef668fd84ffc4c1c508d60
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2eb71e8b142a0d099cef668fd84ffc4c1c508d60.diff
LOG: [T
https://github.com/bryanpkc closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75516
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+//===--- AvoidNestedConditionalOperatorCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --===//
EugeneZelenko wrote:
Please add `-`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78022
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commi
kkwli wrote:
How would `flang-new -fno-fortran-main t.f -lFortran_main` work?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78152
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tblah wrote:
> How would `flang-new -fno-fortran-main t.f -lFortran_main` work?
Good question. This won't work with this patch but currently should work. I'll
have to fix this.
Do you agree that `flang-new -lFortran_main` is something we want to make work?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
https://github.com/kiranchandramohan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76258
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78180
None
From aacfc3f06ee51ede08464cb23ec32b210e703b6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:41:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer] Add function 'fscan
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balázs Kéri (balazske)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78180.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StreamChecker.cpp (+61)
- (modified) clang/test/Anal
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Balázs Kéri (balazske)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78180.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StreamChecker.cpp (+61)
- (modified) clang/test/Analysis/stream-error.
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Pavel Gueorguiev
Date: 2024-01-15T11:11:16-05:00
New Revision: 24c89bbfd7ad1d1d6b2c037a56d78722411b26e1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/24c89bbfd7ad1d1d6b2c037a56d78722411b26e1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/24c89bbfd7ad1d1d6b2c037a56d78722411b26e1.di
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
> I fixed all the comments. So what's the next step?
I've merged the commit on your behalf, thank you for the cleanup!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
@@ -27,34 +27,23 @@ main_body:
ret float %out0
}
-define amdgpu_ps float @atomic_pk_add_bf16_1d_v2(<8 x i32> inreg %rsrc, <2 x
i16> %data, i32 %s) {
+define amdgpu_ps float @atomic_pk_add_bf16_1d_v2(<8 x i32> inreg %rsrc, <2 x
bfloat> %data, i32 %s) {
; GFX12-LABEL: atomi
https://github.com/arsenm commented:
Missing UniformityAnalysis test for these
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76224
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
elhewaty wrote:
@Fznamznon So should I update the test files manually?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78064
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78112
>From 12307d487a956896f283aebf73cdb9b95587d068 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 19:52:31 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] [SemaCXX] Implement CWG2627 Bit-fields and narrowing
co
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> Can you provide more context for this?
I believe this is a follow-up to #77311.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77465
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov approved this pull request.
Approve from my side too, but please make sure to apply suggestion from
@cor3ntin and clang-format before submitting.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77465
___
cfe-commits mailing
asb wrote:
There should be a release note for this as well as the RISCVUsage update.
I have concerns that the codegen part of this isn't correct. Specifically, the
[requirement](https://llvm.org/docs/Atomics.html#atomics-and-codegen) that "One
very important property of the atomic operations i
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> @ilya-biryukov any chance you/your folks could test this change for
> performance implications in google? It's especially helpful to CERN, but the
> last iteration of this direction had some regressions that stalled out
> progress on that version a few years ago, so it'd
kiranchandramohan wrote:
> Introduce createSectionOp
`genSectionOp`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77759
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -13861,6 +13897,36 @@ Sema::CheckReturnValExpr(Expr *RetValExp, QualType
lhsType,
CheckPPCMMAType(RetValExp->getType(), ReturnLoc);
}
+/// Diagnose comparison to NAN or INFINITY in fast math modes.
+/// The comparison to NaN or INFINITY is always false in
+/// fast mod
https://github.com/kiranchandramohan approved this pull request.
LG.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77759
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -816,6 +816,18 @@ TEST_F(TokenBufferTest, SpelledByExpanded) {
EXPECT_EQ(Buffer.spelledForExpanded(findExpanded("prev good")),
std::nullopt);
}
+TEST_F(TokenBufferTest, NoCrashForEofToken) {
+ recordTokens(R"cpp(
+int main() {
+ )cpp");
+ // Calling spelledForExpa
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov approved this pull request.
Thanks, LGTM! I only have a minor (and optional) suggestion.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78092
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78092
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if
https://github.com/fabianmcg updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78057
>From f56a7395b19ff634b3ac963204348db2575fdf87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Mora
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:31:51 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Move OffloadWrapper.* to llvm/Frontend/Offloading
---
.../i
mjklemm wrote:
I'm kind of split brain on this. While I do see the issue, I'm not sure if
this should be considered a bug or a user error.
One thing that come to my mind though is (remotely related to this) to have a
command line flag that reports the proper libraries needed to successfully l
201 - 300 of 503 matches
Mail list logo
