================
@@ -15845,8 +15845,10 @@ void Sema::CheckCoroutineWrapper(FunctionDecl *FD) {
RecordDecl *RD = FD->getReturnType()->getAsRecordDecl();
if (!RD || !RD->getUnderlyingDecl()->hasAttr<CoroReturnTypeAttr>())
return;
- // Allow `get_return_object()`.
- if (FD->getDeclName().isIdentifier() &&
+ // Allow some_promise_type::get_return_object().
+ // Since we are still in the promise definition, we can only do this
+ // heuristically as the promise may not be yet associated to a coroutine.
+ if (isa<CXXMethodDecl>(FD) && FD->getDeclName().isIdentifier() &&
FD->getName().equals("get_return_object") && FD->param_empty())
return;
----------------
usx95 wrote:
I don't understand what purpose it would serve. Do you want
`[[clang::coro_disable_lifetimebound]]` to imply `[[clang::coro_wrapper]]` for
brevity?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
