r268912.
Thanks,
Rafael
On 6 May 2016 at 17:06, Michael Lampe wrote:
> No, I'm hoping on someone else to commit this. (You?)
>
> Same with this one:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org/msg18696.html
>
> -Michael
>
>
> Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>>
>> LGTM. Do you have commi
No, I'm hoping on someone else to commit this. (You?)
Same with this one:
https://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org/msg18696.html
-Michael
Rafael Espíndola wrote:
LGTM. Do you have commit access?
Cheers,
Rafael
On 11 April 2016 at 14:49, Michael Lampe wrote:
New patch attac
LGTM. Do you have commit access?
Cheers,
Rafael
On 11 April 2016 at 14:49, Michael Lampe wrote:
> New patch attached.
>
> -Michael
>
>
> Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>>
>> LGTM with a comment saying why it is needed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rafael
>>
>>
>> On 22 March 2016 at 23:02, Michael Lampe via cfe-c
New patch attached.
-Michael
Rafael Espíndola wrote:
LGTM with a comment saying why it is needed.
Cheers,
Rafael
On 22 March 2016 at 23:02, Michael Lampe via cfe-commits
wrote:
Some distros with ten years of support ship an old gcc but later offer more
recent versions for installation in p
LGTM with a comment saying why it is needed.
Cheers,
Rafael
On 22 March 2016 at 23:02, Michael Lampe via cfe-commits
wrote:
> Some distros with ten years of support ship an old gcc but later offer more
> recent versions for installation in parallel. These versions are typically
> not only neede