r268912. Thanks, Rafael
On 6 May 2016 at 17:06, Michael Lampe <la...@gcsc.uni-frankfurt.de> wrote: > No, I'm hoping on someone else to commit this. (You?) > > Same with this one: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org/msg18696.html > > -Michael > > > Rafael Espíndola wrote: >> >> LGTM. Do you have commit access? >> >> Cheers, >> Rafael >> >> >> On 11 April 2016 at 14:49, Michael Lampe <la...@gcsc.uni-frankfurt.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> New patch attached. >>> >>> -Michael >>> >>> >>> Rafael Espíndola wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> LGTM with a comment saying why it is needed. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Rafael >>>> >>>> >>>> On 22 March 2016 at 23:02, Michael Lampe via cfe-commits >>>> <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Some distros with ten years of support ship an old gcc but later offer >>>>> more >>>>> recent versions for installation in parallel. These versions are >>>>> typically >>>>> not only needed for the compilation of llvm/clang, but also to properly >>>>> use >>>>> the clang binary that comes out. >>>>> >>>>> Clang already searches /usr at runtime for the most recent installation >>>>> of >>>>> gcc. This patch appends paths for add-on installations of gcc in RHEL. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> cfe-commits mailing list >>>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
