asb wrote:
> > I haven't made it so if you enable all extensions that constitute Sha, Sha
> > is implied.
>
> Great! I think it's most clear if we have "extensions only require things
> they are made up of" (i.e. all the implications/requirements point to
> earlier/lesser extensions) and "pro
lenary wrote:
> I haven't made it so if you enable all extensions that constitute Sha, Sha is
> implied.
Great! I think it's most clear if we have "extensions only require things they
are made up of" (i.e. all the implications/requirements point to earlier/lesser
extensions) and "profiles are
https://github.com/asb closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alex Bradbury (asb)
Changes
This was introduced in the now-ratified RVA23 profile (and also added to the
RVA22 text) as a simple way of referring to H plus the set of supervisor
extensions required by RVA23.
https://github.com/riscv/risc
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Alex Bradbury (asb)
Changes
This was introduced in the now-ratified RVA23 profile (and also added to the
RVA22 text) as a simple way of referring to H plus the set of supervisor
extensions required by RVA23.
https://github.com/r
https://github.com/asb created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113820
This was introduced in the now-ratified RVA23 profile (and also added to the
RVA22 text) as a simple way of referring to H plus the set of supervisor
extensions required by RVA23.
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-pro
