lenary wrote: > I haven't made it so if you enable all extensions that constitute Sha, Sha is > implied.
Great! I think it's most clear if we have "extensions only require things they are made up of" (i.e. all the implications/requirements point to earlier/lesser extensions) and "profiles are how you enforce a lower bound on the set of extensions present" we're going to be in a much more sustainable situation than other architectures where they try to use the presence of a combination of other extensions to lower-bound the set of present extensions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113820 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
