[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-23 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105693 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-23 Thread Joshua Cranmer via cfe-commits
https://github.com/jcranmer-intel approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105693 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-23 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote: > It might be better to list most of these as "N/A" rather than "No", for the > simple reason that decimal floating point is an optional feature we do not > support. Or maybe just a footnote saying something to that effect? I think eventually I'd like to split out optional

[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-23 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
@@ -216,35 +216,31 @@ C23 implementation status https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2341.pdf";>N2341 -Unknown - - -https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2401.pdf";>N2401 -Unknown +No

[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-23 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
@@ -216,35 +216,31 @@ C23 implementation status https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2341.pdf";>N2341 -Unknown - - -https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2401.pdf";>N2401 -Unknown +No

[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-22 Thread Joshua Cranmer via cfe-commits
https://github.com/jcranmer-intel commented: It might be better to list most of these as "N/A" rather than "No", for the simple reason that decimal floating point is an optional feature we do not support. Or maybe just a footnote saying something to that effect? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr

[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-22 Thread Joshua Cranmer via cfe-commits
@@ -216,35 +216,31 @@ C23 implementation status https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2341.pdf";>N2341 -Unknown - - -https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2401.pdf";>N2401 -Unknown +No

[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-22 Thread Joshua Cranmer via cfe-commits
@@ -216,35 +216,31 @@ C23 implementation status https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2341.pdf";>N2341 -Unknown - - -https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2401.pdf";>N2401 -Unknown +No

[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-22 Thread Joshua Cranmer via cfe-commits
https://github.com/jcranmer-intel edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105693 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [C23] Update status page for TS 18661 integration (PR #105693)

2024-08-22 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote: Up for review just to make sure there's not been work happening that I wasn't aware of, and to verify the removal of N2401. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105693 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org ht