AaronBallman wrote: > It might be better to list most of these as "N/A" rather than "No", for the > simple reason that decimal floating point is an optional feature we do not > support. Or maybe just a footnote saying something to that effect?
I think eventually I'd like to split out optional annexes and TSes to a separate table so we can track whether they're available in Clang or not rather than whether we conform or not. But for right now, I'd say let's stick with `No` because it's clear that we don't support them rather than N/A which somewhat implies that we don't need to make compiler changes to support them. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105693 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
