r268912.
Thanks,
Rafael
On 6 May 2016 at 17:06, Michael Lampe wrote:
> No, I'm hoping on someone else to commit this. (You?)
>
> Same with this one:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org/msg18696.html
>
> -Michael
>
>
> Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>>
>> LGTM. Do you have commi
No, I'm hoping on someone else to commit this. (You?)
Same with this one:
https://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org/msg18696.html
-Michael
Rafael Espíndola wrote:
LGTM. Do you have commit access?
Cheers,
Rafael
On 11 April 2016 at 14:49, Michael Lampe wrote:
New patch attac
LGTM. Do you have commit access?
Cheers,
Rafael
On 11 April 2016 at 14:49, Michael Lampe wrote:
> New patch attached.
>
> -Michael
>
>
> Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>>
>> LGTM with a comment saying why it is needed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rafael
>>
>>
>> On 22 March 2016 at 23:02, Michael Lampe via cfe-c
New patch attached.
-Michael
Rafael Espíndola wrote:
LGTM with a comment saying why it is needed.
Cheers,
Rafael
On 22 March 2016 at 23:02, Michael Lampe via cfe-commits
wrote:
Some distros with ten years of support ship an old gcc but later offer more
recent versions for installation in p
LGTM with a comment saying why it is needed.
Cheers,
Rafael
On 22 March 2016 at 23:02, Michael Lampe via cfe-commits
wrote:
> Some distros with ten years of support ship an old gcc but later offer more
> recent versions for installation in parallel. These versions are typically
> not only neede
Some distros with ten years of support ship an old gcc but later offer
more recent versions for installation in parallel. These versions are
typically not only needed for the compilation of llvm/clang, but also to
properly use the clang binary that comes out.
Clang already searches /usr at run
