[PATCH] D81761: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rG690ff37a2869: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden (authored by Szelethus). Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81761?vs=274466&id=275598#toc Repository: rG LLVM Github Mo

[PATCH] D81761: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rG690ff37a2869: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden (authored by Szelethus). Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81761?vs=274466&id=275651#toc Repository: rG LLVM Github Mo

[PATCH] D81761: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden

baloghadamsoftware accepted this revision. baloghadamsoftware added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Now it looks good to me. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81761/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81761 __

[PATCH] D81761: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden

Szelethus updated this revision to Diff 274466. Szelethus added a comment. Revert changes to plugins and to the related tests, allow the `example` package to bypass the new restriction. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81761/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81761 Files: c

[PATCH] D81761: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden

baloghadamsoftware added a comment. In D81761#2097737 , @Szelethus wrote: > In D81761#2097561 , @balazske wrote: > > > My observation is, if there is an example checker, it should be really > > "example" and not "t

[PATCH] D81761: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden

Szelethus added a comment. In D81761#2097561 , @balazske wrote: > My observation is, if there is an example checker, it should be really > "example" and not "test". (The "custom" is probably good to rename to "test" > but not the "example".) (The names o

[PATCH] D81761: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden

balazske added a comment. My observation is, if there is an example checker, it should be really "example" and not "test". (The "custom" is probably good to rename to "test" but not the "example".) (The names of these files look not good too: A **CheckerOptionHandling.cpp** contains an example

[PATCH] D81761: [analyzer] Force dependency checkers to be hidden

Szelethus created this revision. Szelethus added reviewers: NoQ, vsavchenko, dcoughlin, xazax.hun, balazske, martong, baloghadamsoftware. Szelethus added a project: clang. Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, ASDenysPetrov, steakhal, Charusso, gamesh411, dkrupp, donat.nagy, mikhail.ramalho, a.s