@@ -1,14 +1,42 @@
struct A {
- void foo(this A self, int arg);
+ void foo(this auto&& self, int arg);
+ void bar(this A self, int arg);
};
-int main() {
+int func1() {
A a {};
a.
}
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:%(line-2):5
-std=c++23
MythreyaK wrote:
The completion for `(&A::foo2)` is just `(A, int)`, not `foo(A, int)`. I tried
to add a test case, like in this [godbolt](https://godbolt.org/z/77zE7e3oE)
example,
```cpp
struct A {
void foo1(this A self, int arg) {}
template
void foo2(this T&& self, int arg, flo
https://github.com/MythreyaK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146649
>From 7f8581f01c3c25363b77100635c6df7223badba3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mythreya Kuricheti
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 01:26:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][CodeComplete] skip explicit obj param in
Sign
MythreyaK wrote:
Seems to be working as expected. I'll add a test case for this as well.
https://github.com/llvm/
MythreyaK wrote:
> How does completion handle things like this?
@cor3ntin Oh I totally forgot about this! Thanks! I'll check it in the evening.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146649
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
https://github.com/MythreyaK edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146649
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MythreyaK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146649
>From 7f8581f01c3c25363b77100635c6df7223badba3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mythreya Kuricheti
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 01:26:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][CodeComplete] skip explicit obj param in
Signatur
