MythreyaK wrote: The completion for `(&A::foo2)` is just `(A, int)`, not `foo(A, int)`. I tried to add a test case, like in this [godbolt](https://godbolt.org/z/77zE7e3oE) example,
```cpp struct A { void foo1(this A self, int arg) {} template <typename T> void foo2(this T&& self, int arg, float arg2) {} }; int main() { A a {}; (&A::foo1)(a, 1); (&A::foo2<A&>)(a, 1, 3.4); // possible? // (&A::foo2<A&>)(a, 1 /* , 3.4*/); // causes a compiler crash return 0; } ``` but causes a crash ([example](https://godbolt.org/z/oo198z8Gh)). So I haven't added those cases, but left a `TODO`. Should I leave a `TODO: PR 146649` instead? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146649 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits