SGTM
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 28, 2017, at 5:25 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:31 PM Craig Topper wrote:
>> So if you use -march=hsw the backend will think rtm is enabled, but clang
>> will block the intrinsics in the frontend?
>
> Yeah. I've come to th
Woot! Thanks!
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:47 PM, Eric Christopher via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>
> Author: echristo
> Date: Thu Oct 15 18:47:11 2015
> New Revision: 250473
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=250473&view=rev
> Log:
> Add an error when calling a builtin that requires feature
grosbach added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10414#243302, @jmolloy wrote:
> In an ideal world, yes. However there's no guarantee that all ARM
> implementors will (a) be able to commit to LLVM or (b) use ToT. Perhaps
> they're building a project that uses clang, or a specific version o
grosbach added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10414#243056, @jmolloy wrote:
> Non-restricted IT blocks are indeed deprecated for ARMv8 in the ARMARM. But
> there are circumstances where you may still want to emit them - the biggest
> example being you're compiling for a CPU microarchite
> On Sep 10, 2015, at 1:24 AM, James Molloy wrote:
>
> jmolloy added a subscriber: jmolloy.
> jmolloy added a comment.
>
> Hi Akira,
>
> I'm sorry to be contrary (and I missed the discussion on Tuesday because I
> was away on vacation) but I think there *is* a usecase for -mno-restrict-it
>
