grosbach added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10414#243056, @jmolloy wrote:
> Non-restricted IT blocks are indeed deprecated for ARMv8 in the ARMARM. But > there are circumstances where you may still want to emit them - the biggest > example being you're compiling for a CPU microarchitecture that you *know* > doesn't have a performance penalty on non-restricted IT blocks. Restricted IT > blocks can pessimize code quite badly in some circumstances, and allowing > people to turn it off for their target if needed is very important, IMO. Bother, email response isn't showing up in Phab. Reposting here so there's a record. Sorry for the duplication on-list. If such microarchitectures exist, shouldn’t they be represented properly as a CPU in the backend and get the right setting by default? http://reviews.llvm.org/D10414 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
