wsehjk wrote:
@tbaederr
Could you review my code? I'm not sure if I did it right
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130400
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Xazax-hun wrote:
> That is, this issue is unrelated to system headers or not, but rather that
> there are some declarations that are not top-level declarations. Why that's
> the case, or if it's intentional, is way beyond my knowledge.
I see. I think we should the very least investigate this.
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/wsehjk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130400
This pr is to fix #92342.
>From a6ca9cc820e98b093215b1bd0787d4fa3d31742d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wang shiwen
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 15:40:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] disable unary, vector mask
---
clang/l
https://github.com/owenca requested changes to this pull request.
Why should we add those macros to the default list? Can't you use the
[`AttributeMacros`](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#attributemacros)
option instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/13034
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128679
>From b4001f95cf6d35f59ef8af6df8f2bdbe043da380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:47:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [alpha.webkit.webkit.RetainPtrCtorAdoptChecker] Add a new
WebK
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128679
>From b4001f95cf6d35f59ef8af6df8f2bdbe043da380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:47:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [alpha.webkit.webkit.RetainPtrCtorAdoptChecker] Add a new
WebK
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128679
>From b4001f95cf6d35f59ef8af6df8f2bdbe043da380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:47:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [alpha.webkit.webkit.RetainPtrCtorAdoptChecker] Add a new
WebK
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130399
getRecord() returns null on array elements, even for composite arrays. The
assertion here was overly restrictive and having an array element as instance
pointer should be fine otherwise.
>From a4327462a417aeb
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve2-vla-2stage` running on `linaro-g4-01` while building
`clang` at step 12 "ninja check 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/199/builds/2062
Here is the relevant piece
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot6` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/164/builds/7889
Here is the releva
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
getRecord() returns null on array elements, even for composite arrays. The
assertion here was overly restrictive and having an array element as instance
pointer should be fine otherwise.
---
Full diff: http
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2025-03-08T13:41:24+08:00
New Revision: 6f7570c200aa1ee9af9d1eb7a378d56264ee297e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f7570c200aa1ee9af9d1eb7a378d56264ee297e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f7570c200aa1ee9af9d1eb7a378d56264ee297e.diff
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126846
>From 106a982e3c6bcfa3ee7c26133f0919791699f31a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 18:16:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Fix signed-unsigned comparison with UO_Not and UO_Minus
---
https://github.com/tbaederr edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130143
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -22,56 +22,144 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s \
// RUN: -DFNATTRS
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130143
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Carlos =?utf-8?q?Gálvez?= ,
Carlos =?utf-8?q?Gálvez?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
HerrCai0907 wrote:
I prefer to start from this patch. Because it is already here without
additional effort.
Just like the incubator, when it has been tested by a certain number of users
and is stable enough, then
@@ -154,3 +154,26 @@ int g() {
static_assert(f(arr) == 5);
}
}
+
+namespace GH128409 {
+ int &ff();
+ int &x = ff(); // nointerpreter-note {{declared here}}
+ constinit int &z = x; // expected-error {{variable does not have a constant
initializer}}
+
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Brad Smith (brad0)
Changes
IsIntegratedAssemblerDefault is already set in
Generic_GCC::IsIntegratedAssemblerDefault
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130397.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Dri
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-03-08T06:06:14+01:00
New Revision: d08cf7900d2aaff9e7483ea74a58871edbdc45f2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d08cf7900d2aaff9e7483ea74a58871edbdc45f2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d08cf7900d2aaff9e7483ea74a58871edbdc45f2.diff
L
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Brad Smith (brad0)
Changes
IsIntegratedAssemblerDefault is already set in
Generic_GCC::IsIntegratedAssemblerDefault
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130397.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/Too
https://github.com/brad0 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130397
IsIntegratedAssemblerDefault is already set in
Generic_GCC::IsIntegratedAssemblerDefault
>From 5cb790da8c2de53ac604ea581b1baa4c2259e2a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Smith
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 21:50:15 -05
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126846
>From 331ff18c3c3c3a16b7833e6c5299dc40cfacf694 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 18:16:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix signed-unsigned integer comparison diagnosis that
contains
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-win-x-aarch64`
running on `as-builder-2` while building `clang` at step 9 "test-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/193/builds/6143
Here is the relevant piece of th
https://github.com/mpark edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129982
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126846
>From d7404029e8998c8c8945cfaa34cf99b743ec2b70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 18:16:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Fix no warning for comparison of integers of different
sign
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
Author: Jan Svoboda (jansvoboda11)
Changes
Currently, `LockFileManager` assumes the owner of the lock file creates an
output file. This is problematic for at least three reasons:
1. It is orthogonal to the main purpose of this class - mutu
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130395
Currently, `LockFileManager` assumes the owner of the lock file creates an
output file. This is problematic for at least three reasons:
1. It is orthogonal to the main purpose of this class - mutual exclus
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129396
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129396
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+//===- hlsl_intrinsic_helpers.h - HLSL helpers intrinsics
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -22,56 +22,136 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
-// RUN: -DFNATTRS="spir_func noundef nofpclass(nan inf)" -DTY
DeinAlptraum wrote:
@Endilll do you understand where this test failure might come from? It passes
for me locally...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130383
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
https://github.com/arsenm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
LGTM, same observation as Erich regarding CMAKE stuff tho
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130322
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
Author: Matt Arsenault
Date: 2025-03-08T10:53:03+07:00
New Revision: 7602d781b03427052c44537fa4b9c2a6da15697c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7602d781b03427052c44537fa4b9c2a6da15697c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7602d781b03427052c44537fa4b9c2a6da15697c.diff
Zhenhang1213 wrote:
> @Zhenhang1213 : Code looks ok. Are all edge cases covered by the lit test now?
>
> Could you please adjust the commit message to reflect the actual changes?
OK， I add more tests to cover, thx!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130027
__
https://github.com/Zhenhang1213 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Zhenhang1213 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Zhenhang1213 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130027
>From b7c6a38f913f5e83e9a72e0b81607de01a8a1b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Austin
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 17:25:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] mtp = auto using hard point while arch supports thumb2
and h
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple arm64-apple-ios -fsyntax-only -verify
-fptrauth-intrinsics -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only -verify
-fptrauth-intrinsics -std=c++11 %s
+
+template struct G {
+ T __ptrauth(0,0,1234) test;
+
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ namespace {
// value of the expression to the unqualified, non-atomic version of
// the named type.
if (!S.Context.getLangOpts().ObjC && !DestType->isRecordType() &&
- !DestType->isArrayType()) {
+ !DestType->isArrayType
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130383
This covers the `File` interface changes introduced added by #120590
>From 8a206611120c15010381e1570c2b4d7548142dbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathias Stearn
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 16:22:04 +0100
Subje
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
e22579a6752801a5d3ced59c7a2e2499d547c657...8a206611120c15010381e1570c2b4d7548142dbd
clang
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jannick Kremer (DeinAlptraum)
Changes
This covers the `File` interface changes added by #120590
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130383.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py (+
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130383
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Jan Voung (jvoung)
Changes
Add support for formatting w/ absl nullability macros
(https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/blob/c52afac4f87ef76e6293b84874e5126a62be1f15/absl/base/nullability.h#L237).
Example at https://godbolt.org/z/PYv
https://github.com/jvoung ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jvoung edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jvoung edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jvoung edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -22,56 +22,136 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
-// RUN: -DFNATTRS="spir_func noundef nofpclass(nan inf)" -DTY
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130297
>From 8ef214f6c78d710dbd9c74b06c7c637baf93e527 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 00:03:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-tidy] Add new check bugprone-capture-this-by-field
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130297
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130258
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HighCommander4 wrote:
> > we've had users for whom the BuiltinHeaders: QueryDriver behaviour worked
> > better and want to switch back to it (examples here, here, here, here).
>
> I'd argue that the fix isn't as simple as using builtin headers from a
> different toolchain for those users. Beca
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130297
>From 8ef214f6c78d710dbd9c74b06c7c637baf93e527 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 00:03:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Add new check bugprone-capture-this-by-field
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang-tools-extra,clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/2142
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Thank you for the PR, some after commit review. The bugprone comment should be
addressed and if there are more cases we catch that are not covered by existing
tests, we should add more tests.
The in class member initializers feels like it would be worth doi
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -12796,6 +12799,7 @@ namespace {
}
void VisitCXXOperatorCallExpr(CXXOperatorCallExpr *E) {
+ llvm::SaveAndRestore CxxOpCallScope(isInCXXOperatorCall, true);
shafik wrote:
We should be using
[bugprone-argument-comment](https://clang.llvm.org/e
aheejin wrote:
@llvm-ci The CI failure does not look relevant.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -892,6 +892,11 @@ namespace lambdas {
return a1.x;
});
A a2([&] { return a2.x; }); // ok
+A a3([=] { return a3.x; }()); // expected-warning{{variable 'a3' is
uninitialized when used within its own initialization}}
shafik wrote:
Do we now
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: 2025-03-07T11:15:20+08:00
New Revision: 55f86cf02336e0a1bce81403296cce6d4cfbb1e4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55f86cf02336e0a1bce81403296cce6d4cfbb1e4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55f86cf02336e0a1bce81403296cce6d4cfbb1e4.diff
LO
@@ -9180,6 +9180,12 @@ bool Sema::hasAcceptableDefinition(NamedDecl *D,
NamedDecl **Suggested,
if (!getLangOpts().Modules && !getLangOpts().ModulesLocalVisibility)
return true;
+ // The external source may have additional definitions of this entity that
are
+ // visi
https://github.com/mpark edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129982
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -22,56 +22,136 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
-// RUN: -DFNATTRS="spir_func noundef nofpclass(nan inf)" -DTY
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/13207
Here is th
@@ -22,56 +22,136 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
-// RUN: -DFNATTRS="spir_func noundef nofpclass(nan inf)" -DTY
@@ -22,56 +22,144 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s \
// RUN: -DFNATTRS
https://github.com/kmpeng updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320
>From bdb66b5a68090e304647ddbbeb403ac408fcea65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kmpeng
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:50:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] start implementation
---
clang/lib/Headers/hlsl/hlsl_detail.h | 14
https://github.com/aheejin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Heejin Ahn
Date: 2025-03-07T16:54:22-08:00
New Revision: 76393d3863bf7394edb69fb6a371b9a1c2c09ff6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/76393d3863bf7394edb69fb6a371b9a1c2c09ff6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/76393d3863bf7394edb69fb6a371b9a1c2c09ff6.diff
LO
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alan Zhao (alanzhao1)
Changes
Additionally, remove the behavior for both pass manager's timer manager classes
(`PassTimingInfo` for the old pass manager and `TimePassesHandler` for the new
pass manager) where these classes would print the
https://github.com/alanzhao1 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130375
Additionally, remove the behavior for both pass manager's timer manager classes
(`PassTimingInfo` for the old pass manager and `TimePassesHandler` for the new
pass manager) where these classes would print the
@@ -12609,6 +12611,7 @@ namespace {
isPODType = false;
isRecordType = false;
isReferenceType = false;
+ isInCXXOperatorCall = false;
shafik wrote:
It feels like changing this to use in class member initializers would have been
a big win
https://github.com/shafik edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129198
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dtarditi commented:
@ziqingluo-90 @malavikasamak thanks for adding me to this review. I left one
informational comment and one piece of feedback.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
@@ -353,23 +355,90 @@ isInUnspecifiedUntypedContext(internal::Matcher
InnerMatcher) {
return stmt(anyOf(CompStmt, IfStmtThen, IfStmtElse));
}
+// Returns true iff integer E1 is equivalent to integer E2.
+//
+// For now we only support such expressions:
+//expr := DRE |
https://github.com/dtarditi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dtarditi wrote:
I agree that it is fine to not handle this for now.
If we do decide to handle this, we need to be careful because this equivalence
does not hold for signed integer arithmetic expressions in C. The equivalence
relies on commutativity and as
dzaima wrote:
Would there be some way to explicitly request to not clobber vl/vtype? An asm
block is quite useful as an "optimization fence" on x86 & ARM NEON, but it'd be
sad if that necessarily meant extra vsetvl spam on RVV (currently clang doesn't
do much optimization on RVV intrinsics so
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff b41b86a907f653f79bab10d4c80b3a41d146c71b
4bcd12c8f699240ef19b7540ac8ac89969a1621f --e
tgross35 wrote:
Nothing about the implementation stands out to me as wrong. It looks like the
exponent isn't correct, I guess you could step through this portion
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ae42f071032b29821beef6a337712580861c/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/fp_extend_impl.inc#L65-L6
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
Follow up to c6b9d5ce76a155b682b1562122f43166aaa6391d in another instance.
This is still failing in unrelated PR prechecks, but passing its own check.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
arsenm wrote:
* **#130371** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/130371?utm_source=stack-comment-icon";
target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite"
width="10px" height="10px"/> 👈 https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/13037
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130371
Follow up to c6b9d5ce76a155b682b1562122f43166aaa6391d in another instance.
This is still failing in unrelated PR prechecks, but passing its own check.
>From 41ecac5701fec0f0a358f4503f469f2562b31210 Mon Sep 17 00:
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/13202
Here is th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Richard Smith (zygoloid)
Changes
Optimizations:
- Only build the skeleton for each identifier once, rather than once for each
declaration of that identifier.
- Only compute the contexts in which identifiers are declared for identifie
@@ -22,56 +22,144 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s \
// RUN: -DFNATTRS
https://github.com/zygoloid created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130369
Optimizations:
- Only build the skeleton for each identifier once, rather than once for each
declaration of that identifier.
- Only compute the contexts in which identifiers are declared for identifiers
that
https://github.com/kmpeng edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kmpeng edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 475 matches
Mail list logo
