================
@@ -9180,6 +9180,12 @@ bool Sema::hasAcceptableDefinition(NamedDecl *D,
NamedDecl **Suggested,
if (!getLangOpts().Modules && !getLangOpts().ModulesLocalVisibility)
return true;
+ // The external source may have additional definitions of this entity that
are
+ // visible, so complete the redeclaration chain now.
+ if (auto *Source = Context.getExternalSource()) {
+ Source->CompleteRedeclChain(D);
+ }
----------------
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Oh, I didn't debug. I thought you didn't look at it. So your analysis is true.
It sounds better than the DefinitionData was updated incorrectly. Let's try to
figure it out.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129982
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
