Charusso marked 2 inline comments as done.
Charusso added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/bugprone/NotNullTerminatedResultCheck.cpp:377-381
+FixItHint::CreateInsertion(exprLocEnd(LengthExpr, Result), ") + 1");
+Diag << InsertFirstParenFix << InsertPlusOneAndSe
Charusso updated this revision to Diff 157916.
Charusso added a comment.
Excuse me for the huge patch, but what I can done wrongly, I did, so I have
made tons of revision.
I would like to show the current direction of the checker. Currently it has too
much overlapping function, so please don't
0x8000- updated this revision to Diff 157899.
0x8000- added a comment.
Update the list of magic values ignored by default.
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49114
Files:
clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
clang-tidy/readability
0x8000- added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:76-86
+ IgnoredFloatingPointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ IgnoredDoublePointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ for (const auto &InputV
rwols closed this revision.
rwols added a comment.
Oh... I should have used `arc land` instead of `svn commit`. Here's the commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rCTE338223
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49967
___
cfe-com
Author: rwols
Date: Sun Jul 29 12:12:42 2018
New Revision: 338223
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=338223&view=rev
Log:
[clangd] Add command-line option
to suppress the space and the circular dot prepended in a completion label.
Modified:
clang-tools-extra/trunk/clangd/tool/Clan
rwols updated this revision to Diff 157894.
rwols added a comment.
Avoid double negative for command line option
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49967
Files:
clangd/tool/ClangdMain.cpp
Index: clangd/tool/ClangdMain.cpp
0x8000- added a comment.
> Based on this, I think the integer list should also include 2, 3, and 4 as
> defaults -- those show up a lot more than I'd have expected. As for
> floating-point values, 1.0 certainly jumps out at me, but none of the rest
> seem particularly common. What do you th
aaron.ballman added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49114#1179652, @0x8000- wrote:
> Top 40 magic numbers in https://github.com/qt/qtbase
>
> 4859 2
> 2901 3
> 1855 4
>985 5
>968 8
>605 6
>600 7
>439 16
>432 10
>363
>356 32
>241 1.0f
>217
MarcoFalke added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D48098#1174771, @krasimir wrote:
> MarcoFalke: do you need someone to submit this for you?
Yes, I'd appreciate any help on how to submit this for merge.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48098
___
c
0x8000- added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:76-86
+ IgnoredFloatingPointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ IgnoredDoublePointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ for (const auto &InputV
sammccall accepted this revision.
sammccall added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Makes sense, thanks!
Comment at: clangd/tool/ClangdMain.cpp:161
+static llvm::cl::opt NoHeaderInsertDecorators(
+"no-header-insert-decorators",
+llvm::cl::desc(
0x8000- added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:76-86
+ IgnoredFloatingPointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ IgnoredDoublePointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ for (const auto &InputV
0x8000- added a comment.
Top 40 magic numbers in https://github.com/qt/qtbase
4859 2
2901 3
1855 4
985 5
968 8
605 6
600 7
439 16
432 10
363
356 32
241 1.0f
217 12
209 255
207 100
205 9
205 20
204 50
177 0.5
174 15
162 0x2
144 24
rwols created this revision.
rwols added reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov, ioeric.
Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, arphaman, jkorous, MaskRay.
Some LSP clients (e.g. Sublime Text) assume that the label and the completion
trigger have a common
prefix. This assumption is broken by prepend
aaron.ballman added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:76-86
+ IgnoredFloatingPointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ IgnoredDoublePointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ for (const auto &Inpu
Yes, that would be good
Best regards,
Alexey Bataev
> 29 июля 2018 г., в 12:41, Jonas Hahnfeld via cfe-commits
> написал(а):
>
> I just noticed that UsersManual says: "Clang supports all OpenMP 3.1
> directives and clauses." Maybe this should link to OpenMPSupport?
>
>> On 2018-07-26 19:53,
0x8000- updated this revision to Diff 157889.
0x8000- added a comment.
Add a flag to ignore all powers of two integral values.
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49114
Files:
clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
clang-tidy/readabi
0x8000- added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:76-86
+ IgnoredFloatingPointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ IgnoredDoublePointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ for (const auto &InputV
I just noticed that UsersManual says: "Clang supports all OpenMP 3.1
directives and clauses." Maybe this should link to OpenMPSupport?
On 2018-07-26 19:53, Alexey Bataev via cfe-commits wrote:
Author: abataev
Date: Thu Jul 26 10:53:45 2018
New Revision: 338049
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-
0x8000- added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:76-86
+ IgnoredFloatingPointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ IgnoredDoublePointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ for (const auto &InputV
0x8000- added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:76-86
+ IgnoredFloatingPointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ IgnoredDoublePointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ for (const auto &InputV
0x8000- added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:57
+const char DefaultIgnoredIntegerValues[] = "0;1;";
+const char DefaultIgnoredFloatingPointValues[] = "0.0;";
+
aaron.ballman wrote:
> 0x8000- wrote:
> > aaron.ball
aaron.ballman added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:57
+const char DefaultIgnoredIntegerValues[] = "0;1;";
+const char DefaultIgnoredFloatingPointValues[] = "0.0;";
+
0x8000- wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > 0x8000-0
0x8000- added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:57
+const char DefaultIgnoredIntegerValues[] = "0;1;";
+const char DefaultIgnoredFloatingPointValues[] = "0.0;";
+
aaron.ballman wrote:
> 0x8000- wrote:
> > aaron.ball
aaron.ballman added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:76-86
+ IgnoredFloatingPointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ IgnoredDoublePointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ for (const auto &Inpu
0x8000- marked 2 inline comments as done.
0x8000- added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:76-86
+ IgnoredFloatingPointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointValuesInput.size());
+ IgnoredDoublePointValues.reserve(IgnoredFloatingPointV
aaron.ballman added inline comments.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:57
+const char DefaultIgnoredIntegerValues[] = "0;1;";
+const char DefaultIgnoredFloatingPointValues[] = "0.0;";
+
0x8000- wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > I would
0x8000- marked 4 inline comments as done.
0x8000- added a comment.
See inline comments. Basically we need two arrays because APFloats of different
semantics don't compare well, and even if we coerce them, they sometimes are
not equal.
Comment at: clang-tidy/readabilit
0x8000- updated this revision to Diff 157886.
0x8000- added a comment.
Indicate that `0` and `0.0` are accepted unconditionally (because it makes
sense in the source code, and speeds-up many checks as 0s are very common and
we don't want to spend log2(n) to find them at the beginning of
aaron.ballman added a comment.
Thank you for working on this, I think it's getting closer! I'd use a slightly
different approach to handling floating-point values, but if that turns out to
be a clean implementation we may want to think about whether there are
improvements from modelling integer
arsenm updated this revision to Diff 157885.
arsenm added a comment.
Remove old run line
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47154
Files:
include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h
include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsAMDGPU.def
include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h
lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp
lib/Basic/Targets/AMDGPU.h
li
arsenm added inline comments.
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h:1157
+ /// language address space.
+ virtual LangAS getCUDABuiltinAddressSpace(unsigned AS) const {
+return getLangASFromTargetAS(AS);
yaxunl wrote:
> I think this function is not ne
atanasyan accepted this revision.
atanasyan added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49289
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
34 matches
Mail list logo
