Author: ctopper
Date: Thu Sep 22 23:48:27 2016
New Revision: 282227
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282227&view=rev
Log:
[X86] Split up the single switch statement in Sema::CheckX86BuiltinFunctionCall
into different switches or ifs for each type of check.
This in preparation for a n
Author: ctopper
Date: Thu Sep 22 23:48:31 2016
New Revision: 282228
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282228&view=rev
Log:
[AVX-512] Add initial support for checking rounding mode arguments of builtins.
The backend can't encode all possible values of the argument and will fail
isel. C
tstellarAMD accepted this revision.
tstellarAMD added a comment.
LGTM.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24513
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Eugene.Zelenko added a subscriber: Eugene.Zelenko.
Eugene.Zelenko closed this revision.
Eugene.Zelenko added a comment.
Committed in r272402.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21022
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.o
Eugene.Zelenko added a subscriber: Eugene.Zelenko.
Eugene.Zelenko closed this revision.
Eugene.Zelenko added a comment.
Committed in r276750.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21343
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.o
Eugene.Zelenko added a subscriber: Eugene.Zelenko.
Eugene.Zelenko closed this revision.
Eugene.Zelenko added a comment.
Committed in r273659. Please specify Differential revision in commit message.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21677
> On 2016-Sep-22, at 09:53, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>
> tejohnson added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24826#549788, @mehdi_amini wrote:
>
>> The Gold path looks fine.
>> On OSX, we would have the clang driver relying on a LLVM cl::opt, for which
>> I don't think there is any prec
mgehre created this revision.
mgehre added reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman.
mgehre added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Herald added a subscriber: nemanjai.
This fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30487 where
```
warning: uninitialized record type: 's' [cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init
mgehre created this revision.
mgehre added reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein.
mgehre added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
When having
``` c++
#define MACRO code-with-warning
MACRO; // NOLINT
```
clang-tidy would still show the warning, because
it searched for "NOLINT" only in the first
majnemer added a subscriber: majnemer.
majnemer accepted this revision.
majnemer added a reviewer: majnemer.
majnemer added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
ahatanak added a comment.
Thank you for the great example! I can now see this patch does fix mis-compiles.
There are probably other lifetime bugs you'll see when the code being compiled
includes gotos that jump past variable declarations, including the one here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/
NoQ accepted this revision.
NoQ added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Thanks again! LGTM.
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:656
@@ +655,3 @@
+ // Clear the AnalysisManager of old AnalysisDeclContexts.
+ Mgr->ClearContexts(
>What's the purpose of this change
PaddingChecker generates a report on it,
yeah, you are right that it won't save too much (just a little), but
it was easy to fix. Another reason why i am doing this -
it reduces the number of reports produced by static analyzer (less noisy)
- and since it saves sm
alexshap updated this revision to Diff 72206.
alexshap added a comment.
Move the check to AnalysisConsumer::HandleCode.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24792
Files:
lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/RetainCountChecker.cpp
lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp
test/An
What's the purpose of this change? We only put these objects in the stack,
and never have many of them at once. If we don't care about size, a natural
field order seems preferable to one that minimises padding.
On 22 Sep 2016 12:41 pm, "Alexander Shaposhnikov"
wrote:
> alexshap added inline comm
etienneb created this revision.
etienneb added reviewers: rnk, kcc.
etienneb added subscribers: cfe-commits, chrisha.
The ASAN unittests are failing (check-asan-dynamic) due to an incorrect symbol
name:
```
LINK : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol ___asan_seh_interceptor
```
On win64, th
cameron.mcinally closed this revision.
cameron.mcinally added a comment.
This was fixed with r282082.
My cfe-commits email is being held for moderation (not a member of the list),
so there was no automatic update.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24785
__
> From: Renato Golin
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:37:19 +0100
>
> On 22 September 2016 at 16:19, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > No I don't.
>
> No problems. Committed in r282184.
Thanks!
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.l
alexshap added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:154
@@ -153,3 +153,3 @@
public:
- RedeclarableResult(GlobalDeclID FirstID, Decl *MergeWith, bool IsKeyDecl)
- : FirstID(FirstID), MergeWith(MergeWith), IsKeyDecl(IsKeyDecl) {}
+
Author: rengolin
Date: Thu Sep 22 14:28:20 2016
New Revision: 282184
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282184&view=rev
Log:
[OpenBSD] Add type sign information for OpenBSD
Like NetBSD, OpenBSD prefers having a consistent set of typedefs
across the architectures it supports over strictl
On 22 September 2016 at 16:19, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> No I don't.
No problems. Committed in r282184.
cheers,
--renato
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kbarton added a comment.
Aside from one minor comment, this LGTM.
Comment at: lib/Basic/Targets.cpp:1364
@@ -1358,3 +1363,3 @@
// Handle explicit options being passed to the compiler here: if we've
// explicitly turned off vsx and turned on power8-vector or direct-move then
/
Eugene.Zelenko added a subscriber: Eugene.Zelenko.
Eugene.Zelenko closed this revision.
Eugene.Zelenko added a comment.
Committed in r269298.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D20014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.o
scanon accepted this revision.
scanon added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
yaxunl added a comment.
LGTM. Thanks.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NoQ added a comment.
Thanks, this makes a lot more sense to me!
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:691
@@ -690,1 +690,3 @@
+ // Ignore autosynthesized code.
+ if (Mgr->getAnalysisDeclContext(D)->isBodyAutosynthesized())
I think this
tejohnson added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24826#549788, @mehdi_amini wrote:
> The Gold path looks fine.
> On OSX, we would have the clang driver relying on a LLVM cl::opt, for which
> I don't think there is any precedent. CC Duncan for advice.
I do see other uses of -mllvm in l
Abe updated this revision to Diff 72186.
Abe added a comment.
Minor edits for style-guidelines conformance.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24481
Files:
clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
clang/test/CodeGen/aarch64-neon-fma.c
clang/test/CodeGen/aarch64-scalar-fma.c
clang/test/CodeGen/f
mehdi_amini added a comment.
Also I don't think the same option should be used for the parallel LTO codegen:
it actually does not generate the same binary, which should deserve a dedicated
opt-in (What if I mix ThinLTO and LTO, and I don't want // codegen?)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24826
_
mehdi_amini added a comment.
The Gold path looks fine.
On OSX, we would have the clang driver relying on a LLVM cl::opt, for which I
don't think there is any precedent. CC Duncan for advice.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24826
___
cfe-commits mailing
malcolm.parsons updated this revision to Diff 72181.
malcolm.parsons added a comment.
Don't remove init of const members.
Do remove calls to constructors that introduce cleanups.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24339
Files:
clang-tidy/readability/CMakeLists.txt
clang-tidy/readability/ReadabilityT
aprantl added inline comments.
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticFrontendKinds.td:111
@@ -110,1 +110,3 @@
+def warn_fe_unable_to_open_stats_file : Warning<
+"unable to open statistic output file '%0': '%1'">;
def err_fe_no_pch_in_dir : Error<
statstic
Author: vedantk
Date: Thu Sep 22 10:34:33 2016
New Revision: 282169
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282169&view=rev
Log:
[docs] Touch up the coverage docs some more
Modified:
cfe/trunk/docs/SourceBasedCodeCoverage.rst
Modified: cfe/trunk/docs/SourceBasedCodeCoverage.rst
URL:
ht
> From: Renato Golin
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:06:53 +0100
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> It seems not many people have additional comments, so LGTM.
>
> Do you have commit access?
No I don't.
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.
ioeric created this revision.
ioeric added a reviewer: djasper.
ioeric added subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits.
- If a replacement has offset UINT_MAX, length 0, and a replacement text
that is an #include directive, this will insert the #include into the
correct block in the \p Code.
- If a rep
Hi Mark,
It seems not many people have additional comments, so LGTM.
Do you have commit access?
cheers,
--renato
On 20 September 2016 at 19:41, Mark Kettenis via cfe-commits
wrote:
> As discussed in cfe-dev@:
>
> Like NetBSD, OpenBSD prefers having a consistent set of typedefs
> across the arc
ioeric accepted this revision.
ioeric added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Lg with nits.
Comment at: clang-move/ClangMove.cpp:290
@@ -294,1 +289,3 @@
llvm::StringRef FileName) {
+ // Don't add the old_header.h to the
hokein added a comment.
The interfaces look good to me roughly.
Comment at: migrate-tool/MigrationEnvironment.h:22
@@ +21,3 @@
+// RefactoringManager, and AffectedFilesFinder.
+class MigrationEnvironment {
+public:
`MigrationContext` might be better?
==
Author: hokein
Date: Thu Sep 22 09:36:43 2016
New Revision: 282158
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282158&view=rev
Log:
[clang-tidy] Add doc for `explain-config` option.
Modified:
clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/tool/ClangTidyMain.cpp
clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tid
yaxunl added a comment.
I think we need two more tests for concatenating and overriding the option, e.g
-cl-ext=-cl_khr_fp64 -cl-ext=+cl_khr_fp64
and
-cl-ext=-cl_khr_fp64,+cl_khr_fp64
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/OpenCLOptions.h:39
@@ +38,3 @@
+
+ void set(llvm::Strin
vsk accepted this revision.
vsk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM.
Comment at: lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:154
@@ -153,3 +153,3 @@
public:
- RedeclarableResult(GlobalDeclID FirstID, Decl *MergeWith, bool IsKeyDecl)
-
Author: danielmarjamaki
Date: Thu Sep 22 09:13:46 2016
New Revision: 282156
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282156&view=rev
Log:
Fix Wbitfield-constant-conversion false positives
Summary:
The diagnostic did not handle ~ well. An expression such as ~0 is often used
when 'all ones' is
sdardis abandoned this revision.
sdardis added a comment.
I'm abandoning this revision. This test is riddled with errors such as out of
range immediates and type errors that aren't warned about. I'll post a more
substantial patch to address the handling of those cases + update this test and
I'l
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL282156: Fix Wbitfield-constant-conversion false positives
(authored by danielmarjamaki).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24232?vs=70325&id=72169#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://re
ioeric added a comment.
Could you elaborate on what this CL does in the description?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24828
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: tejohnson
Date: Thu Sep 22 08:58:33 2016
New Revision: 282154
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282154&view=rev
Log:
Third attempt to fix Sphinx bot
Bot now complaining about -flto=thin reference, used similar workaround
for that failure.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/docs/CommandGu
hokein created this revision.
hokein added a reviewer: ioeric.
hokein added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24828
Files:
clang-move/ClangMove.cpp
clang-move/ClangMove.h
unittests/clang-move/ClangMoveTests.cpp
Index: unittests/clang-move/ClangMoveTests.cpp
=
aaron.ballman added a comment.
Serialization tests usually come from PCH, so you could probably look in
test/PCH to get ideas on how to test this.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.
ABataev added a subscriber: ABataev.
ABataev added a comment.
You need to add tests for serialization/deserialization
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
tejohnson created this revision.
tejohnson added a reviewer: mehdi_amini.
tejohnson added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Herald added a subscriber: mehdi_amini.
Currently, a linker option must be used to control the backend
parallelism of ThinLTO or full LTO (where it only applies to
parallel code gen
dberris added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24799#549634, @rSerge wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24799#549442, @dberris wrote:
>
> > What does the error actually look like? Can you add a test for it? It's
> > unclear to me how this would read... for example does it say "XRay for
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Aaron Ballman
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Teresa Johnson
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Aaron Ballman
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Teresa Johnson
> wrote:
> >> > Hi Aaron,
> >> >
> >> > I just went
rSerge added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24799#549442, @dberris wrote:
> What does the error actually look like? Can you add a test for it? It's
> unclear to me how this would read... for example does it say "XRay for arm is
> unsupported"?
In the attached picture you can see how
Author: tejohnson
Date: Thu Sep 22 08:41:10 2016
New Revision: 282151
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282151&view=rev
Log:
Second attempt to fix Sphinx bot
The fix in r282148 was not enough to fix the following error:
/home/llvmbb/llvm-build-dir/clang-sphinx-docs/llvm/src/tools/clang
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Aaron Ballman wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> > Hi Aaron,
>> >
>> > I just went back to the bot, which had first failed with a process error
>> > when I made my
eladcohen created this revision.
eladcohen added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
The X86 clang/test/CodeGen/*builtins.c tests define the mm_malloc.h include
guard as a hack for avoiding its inclusion (mm_malloc.h requires a hosted
environment since it expects stdlib.h to be available - which is not t
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Aaron Ballman
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Teresa Johnson
> wrote:
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
> > I just went back to the bot, which had first failed with a process error
> > when I made my commit which is why I didn't see this error. It looks
> like it
> > i
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> I just went back to the bot, which had first failed with a process error
> when I made my commit which is why I didn't see this error. It looks like it
> is still failing with the same error:
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builde
Hi Aaron,
I just went back to the bot, which had first failed with a process error
when I made my commit which is why I didn't see this error. It looks like
it is still failing with the same error:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-sphinx-docs/builds/16313/steps/docs-clang-html/logs/stdio
(
Thank you!
Teresa
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: aaronballman
> Date: Thu Sep 22 07:15:18 2016
> New Revision: 282148
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282148&view=rev
> Log:
> Fixing sphinx build due to
aaron.ballman added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D22910#549611, @sylvestre.ledru wrote:
> What about landing this version now (with test) and do the other operators in
> the a second commit? thanks
I don't see a whole lot of value in that, but I may be missing information --
is this
sylvestre.ledru added a comment.
What about landing this version now (with test) and do the other operators in
the a second commit? thanks
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22910
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org
Author: aaronballman
Date: Thu Sep 22 07:15:18 2016
New Revision: 282148
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282148&view=rev
Log:
Fixing sphinx build due to diagnostic:
/opt/llvm/build.attributes.src/tools/clang/docs/CommandGuide/clang.rst:338:
WARNING: unknown option: -flto=full
Modif
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL282146: [change-namespace] fix qualifier of function
references. (authored by ioeric).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24803?vs=72145&id=72152#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://revi
Author: ioeric
Date: Thu Sep 22 06:54:00 2016
New Revision: 282146
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282146&view=rev
Log:
[change-namespace] fix qualifier of function references.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24803
Modifi
hokein accepted this revision.
hokein added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24803
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
ioeric updated this revision to Diff 72145.
ioeric marked 2 inline comments as done.
ioeric added a comment.
- Addressing review comments: added a test case for out-of-line static method
and fixed a bug.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24803
Files:
change-namespace/ChangeNamespace.cpp
unittests/
hokein added inline comments.
Comment at: change-namespace/ChangeNamespace.cpp:290
@@ +289,3 @@
+ // namespace.
+ // Note that the matcher does not exlude calls to out-of-line static method
+ // definitions, so we need to exclude them in the callback handler.
s
asavonic marked 3 inline comments as done.
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/OpenCLOptions.h:39
@@ +38,3 @@
+
+ void set(llvm::StringRef Ext, bool Enable = true) {
+assert(!Ext.empty() && "Extension is empty.");
yaxunl wrote:
> It seems Enable should be a local
asavonic updated this revision to Diff 72143.
asavonic added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: yaxunl.
Add more test cases and fix minor issues
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23712
Files:
include/clang/Basic/OpenCLOptions.h
include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h
include/clang/Basic/TargetOptions
hokein created this revision.
hokein added a reviewer: klimek.
hokein added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Herald added a subscriber: klimek.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24821
Files:
docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html
include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h
unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersNarrowi
Author: mprobst
Date: Thu Sep 22 02:18:00 2016
New Revision: 282138
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282138&view=rev
Log:
clang-format: [JS] reserved words in method names.
Summary:
Before:
class X {
delete () {
...
}
}
After:
class X {
delete()
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL282138: clang-format: [JS] reserved words in method names.
(authored by mprobst).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24804?vs=72061&id=72140#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.l
73 matches
Mail list logo
