On 23 January 2013 14:13, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 23 January 2013 12:05, C. Boemann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm worried about our release pace. For 2.6 Words was able to make exactly 0
>> new features. Sure we made several fixes, but apart from a few strings those
>> could (almost) just as well h
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Jaime wrote:
Hi,
Probably this is not the right thread to talk about this, but..
I wanted to install calligra for windows to some Spaniards that still use
windows. Before doing that, I tried
the available installer (RC3) on another windows.
There is a big bug I
Hi,
Probably this is not the right thread to talk about this, but..
I wanted to install calligra for windows to some Spaniards that still use
windows. Before doing that, I tried the available installer (RC3) on
another windows.
There is a big bug It is only available in English. Theref
On Sunday 10 February 2013 Feb, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my opinion on release schedule. First, we have to go back and think
> about why we do release ? And more important, to whom we do release ? For me,
> it is obvious that we primarly release to bring improvements to our
On 10 February 2013 11:45, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my opinion on release schedule. First, we have to go back and think
> about why we do release ? And more important, to whom we do release ? For me,
> it is obvious that we primarly release to bring improvements to our users,
On Sunday 10 February 2013 11:50:26 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Now that I have said that. I guess the current problem is that the current
> policy for releases is to have four months between "branching". Instead, we
> could replace that policy by four months between the last major .0 release
> a
Now that I have said that. I guess the current problem is that the current
policy for releases is to have four months between "branching". Instead, we
could replace that policy by four months between the last major .0 release and
the next targetted release.
In this case that would mean, 2.7.0 r
Hi,
Here is my opinion on release schedule. First, we have to go back and think
about why we do release ? And more important, to whom we do release ? For me,
it is obvious that we primarly release to bring improvements to our users,
everything else is and should be a side effect.
== Targeting
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 Jan, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> So, I'm torn. I cannot manage to create a buzz around krita every four
> months, and Krita still needs lots of buzz. I also cannot square it with my
> conscience to keep fixes and features from users for longer than strictly
> necessary
On 25 January 2013 18:16, Yuë Liu wrote:
> We talked about having a testing branch before commit into master
> branch last year. We can restrict commit right to master, let the
> features committed to and tested in testing branch thoroughly. So
> master will always keep stable.
This is done alrea
On Saturday 26 January 2013 09:42:57 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Yuë Liu wrote:
> > We talked about having a testing branch before commit into master
> > branch last year. We can restrict commit right to master, let the
> > features committed to and tested in testin
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Yuë Liu wrote:
> We talked about having a testing branch before commit into master
> branch last year. We can restrict commit right to master, let the
> features committed to and tested in testing branch thoroughly. So
> master will always keep stable.
>
>
I don't
We talked about having a testing branch before commit into master
branch last year. We can restrict commit right to master, let the
features committed to and tested in testing branch thoroughly. So
master will always keep stable.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Pierre Stirnweiss
wrote:
>
>
> On
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:07 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 January 2013 18:25:59 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:05:43 C. Boemann wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I'm worried about our release pace. For 2.6 Words was able to make
> > > exactly 0 new features. Sure we
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 18:25:59 Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:05:43 C. Boemann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm worried about our release pace. For 2.6 Words was able to make
> > exactly 0 new features. Sure we made several fixes, but apart from a few
> > strings those coul
Well, I'm kinda torn about this... I do want to get the latest features and
fixes in people's hands as soon as possible. It's rather weird that the most
intense users of Krita build master on a daily basis just to get that --
releasing more often might save them time (though it would cost us tes
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:05:43 C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm worried about our release pace. For 2.6 Words was able to make exactly
> 0 new features. Sure we made several fixes, but apart from a few strings
> those could (almost) just as well have gone into a bugfix release.
>
> I'm als
On 23 January 2013 12:05, C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm worried about our release pace. For 2.6 Words was able to make exactly 0
> new features. Sure we made several fixes, but apart from a few strings those
> could (almost) just as well have gone into a bugfix release.
>
> I'm also worried that
Hi
I'm worried about our release pace. For 2.6 Words was able to make exactly 0
new features. Sure we made several fixes, but apart from a few strings those
could (almost) just as well have gone into a bugfix release.
I'm also worried that even though we do manage to put in an occasional new
f
19 matches
Mail list logo
