On Monday 07 May 2012 May, Gopalakrishna Bhat wrote:
> Should this be backported to calligra/2.4?
Unless there are new gui strings, I'd say, yes.
--
Boudewijn Rempt
http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl
___
calligra
Should this be backported to calligra/2.4?
On 5/6/12, Commit Hook wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104813/#review13514
> -
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104813/#review13514
---
This review has been submitted with commit
26092c58f9e3d718004
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104813/#review13511
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Thorsten Zachmann
On May 5, 2012, 6:39
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104813/
---
(Updated May 5, 2012, 6:39 a.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
Changes
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104813/
---
(Updated May 5, 2012, 3:24 a.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
Changes
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104813/
---
(Updated May 4, 2012, 8:08 p.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
Changes
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104813/#review13228
---
As written in the comments the functionality should be moved to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104813/
---
Review request for Calligra.
Description
---
We used to ignore the ve
