t; merged my branch words-references-bibliography-smit with master. My branch
>> has all the changes done so far for bibliography support.
>>
>>
>> Ah, good to know[1] :) I would definitively add to your proposal
>> references of the work you did already. Its a *huge* adva
already did some of the
> work. So, imho your proposal should include some words what you have
> already and how exactly you like to spend the gsoc-time to improve that.
>
> [1] Well, I did know you worked on that topic before but have no clue in
> what state that work is. Means what is
On 02/24/2012 09:41 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
On Friday, 2012-02-24, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 02/23/2012 05:59 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2012 Feb, Smit Patel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
**
On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote:
On Friday, 2012-02-24, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 05:59 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 February 2012 Feb, Smit Patel wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> >>> **
> >>> On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >
On 02/24/2012 05:33 AM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 02/23/2012 05:59 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2012 Feb, Smit Patel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
**
On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to propose a GSoC pro
that.
[1] Well, I did know you worked on that topic before but have no clue in
what state that work is. Means what is done and what you like to do
during the gsoc-time. But yes, that's maybe a bit to much input for a
first "gsoc idea" mail but more material for the
On 02/23/2012 05:59 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2012 Feb, Smit Patel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
**
On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to propose a GSoC project. Here's the brief description about
project
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 23 February 2012 19:56, Smit Patel wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23 February 2012 13:31, Smit Patel wrote:
> >> > Hi everyone,
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to propose a GSoC project
On 23 February 2012 19:56, Smit Patel wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>>
>> On 23 February 2012 13:31, Smit Patel wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I'd like to propose a GSoC project. Here's the brief description about
>> > project idea.
>> > Provide a dbus A
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 23 February 2012 13:31, Smit Patel wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to propose a GSoC project. Here's the brief description about
> > project idea.
> > Provide a dbus API that provides an generic interface that can be used by
On Thursday 23 February 2012 Feb, Smit Patel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
>
> > **
> > On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to propose a GSoC project. Here's the brief description about
> > project idea.
> > Provide a
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> **
> On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose a GSoC project. Here's the brief description about
> project idea.
> Provide a dbus API that provides an generic interface that can be used by
> extern
On 23 February 2012 13:31, Smit Patel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose a GSoC project. Here's the brief description about
> project idea.
> Provide a dbus API that provides an generic interface that can be used by
> external bibliography engines (xbiblio, kbibtex, bibus)
> Calligra wo
On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to propose a GSoC project. Here's the brief description about
project idea.
Provide a dbus API that provides an generic interface that can be used
by external bibliography engines (xbiblio, kbibtex, bibus)
dbus is optional[1] an
Hello Celeste, Jonathan, Matt,
Yes I cannot refuse mentoring or co-mentoring.
As Boemann has mentioned I'm pushing a small user feedback module into
Kexi (good news: for Kexi 2.4) [1].
It is an incremental work using my limited resources: at this step it
is a fully automated feedback.
If user ena
Great idea. I'm sure there would be developers willing to mentor this.
We usually divide mentors later on when we know the total pool of student
proposals.
And for Words at least I'm sure we could interact with the student to find the
features to survey.
I know Kexi already has implemented some
For GSOC last year, mattr and I had a student (jonathan perichon)
working on a user survey framework that listens for events on various
services and provides a targeted user feedback survey when certain
behaviors (such interacting with a new feature like a new type of
widget) happen within the serv
17 matches
Mail list logo
