On Thursday 23 February 2012 Feb, Smit Patel wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sebastian Sauer <m...@dipe.org> wrote: > > > ** > > On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'd like to propose a GSoC project. Here's the brief description about > > project idea. > > Provide a dbus API that provides an generic interface that can be used by > > external bibliography engines (xbiblio, kbibtex, bibus) > > > > > > dbus is optional[1] and so would be everything that depends on it. So, why > > dbus? Why not just a plugin? If it should be in another process (stability, > > long-running things, shared among Words-processes, etc) then why not for > > example QLocalServer? > > > > If dbus is not available for windows and OSX then we can rule that out.
Well, actually dbus _is_ available on both Windows and OSX. It's just a bit of a bother on Windows and rather a big bother on OSX. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
