On Thursday, October 13, 2011 18:24:39 PM Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 13 October 2011, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> > Since it's based on webkit, the source code should be available too, i
> > did not see the link to that though.
>
> Seems to be here:
> http://sourceforge.net/adobe/ado
On Thursday 13 October 2011, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> Since it's based on webkit, the source code should be available too, i did
> not see the link to that though.
Seems to be here:
http://sourceforge.net/adobe/adobe-webkit/home/WebKit and Adobe Contributions/
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
_
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 23:44:56 PM Jos van den Oever wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:31:56 AM Jos van den Oever wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:35:40 AM Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> > > On 09/30/2011 07:04 PM, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> > > > On Friday, September 30, 201
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:31:56 AM Jos van den Oever wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:35:40 AM Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> > On 09/30/2011 07:04 PM, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 30, 2011 18:48:59 PM Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> > >> On 09/30/2011 06:17 PM, Boudewij
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:35:40 AM Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 09/30/2011 07:04 PM, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> > On Friday, September 30, 2011 18:48:59 PM Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> >> On 09/30/2011 06:17 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Anything you do in such development is constrained by
On 12 October 2011 10:35, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 09/30/2011 07:04 PM, Jos van den Oever wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, September 30, 2011 18:48:59 PM Sebastian Sauer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/30/2011 06:17 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
> Anything you do in such development is constrained by WAC un
On 09/30/2011 07:04 PM, Jos van den Oever wrote:
On Friday, September 30, 2011 18:48:59 PM Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 09/30/2011 06:17 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Anything you do in such development is constrained by WAC unless you
agree to break compatibility and inject binary lib - then you'd h
On 09/30/2011 07:01 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 30 September 2011 18:37, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 09/30/2011 05:34 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 30 September 2011 15:51, Sebastian Sauerwrote:
On 09/30/2011 10:45 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Friday 30 September 2011 Sep, Sebastian S
On Friday, September 30, 2011 18:48:59 PM Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 09/30/2011 06:17 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> >> Anything you do in such development is constrained by WAC unless you
> >> agree to break compatibility and inject binary lib - then you'd have
> >> to deploy it to other systems to
On 30 September 2011 18:37, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 09/30/2011 05:34 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>>
>> On 30 September 2011 15:51, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/30/2011 10:45 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday 30 September 2011 Sep, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
>>>
>>> 2) to get a
On 09/30/2011 06:37 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
just
like switching from x11 graphicsystem to -raster changes nothing is
this regard. I would also say more layers is a pain with not benefit.
There is no Calligra for HTML5 and I think we do not even think about
it.
Boudewijn just wrote that there
On 30 September 2011 18:17, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Friday 30 September 2011 Sep, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>
>> Dear All, let's step back and think what the broadway-like stuff
>> really is. This is not HTML5 app but client (viewer) for server
>> process that is still native GTK/Qt app that may
On 09/30/2011 06:17 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Anything you do in such development is constrained by WAC unless you
agree to break compatibility and inject binary lib - then you'd have
to deploy it to other systems too (but the why to skip native Qt
programs?)
I don't agree. I think it's perfect
On 09/30/2011 05:34 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 30 September 2011 15:51, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 09/30/2011 10:45 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Friday 30 September 2011 Sep, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
2) to get a HTML5 canvas backend done for Qt similar to what broadway
does in GTK
Actually
On Friday 30 September 2011 Sep, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Dear All, let's step back and think what the broadway-like stuff
> really is. This is not HTML5 app but client (viewer) for server
> process that is still native GTK/Qt app that may be.
Yes, that's true.
> HTML5 app is the
> one that you
On 30 September 2011 15:51, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 09/30/2011 10:45 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
> On Friday 30 September 2011 Sep, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
>
> 2) to get a HTML5 canvas backend done for Qt similar to what broadway
> does in GTK
>
> Actually, that already worked after a fashion
On 09/30/2011 10:45 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Friday 30 September 2011 Sep, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
2) to get a HTML5 canvas backend done for Qt similar to what broadway
does in GTK
Actually, that already worked after a fashion in February or even earlier. I've
seen Marijn demo Tables runn
On 09/30/2011 10:50 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 30 September 2011 10:38, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 09/29/2011 10:42 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
Hello,
I've been following a bit the Tizen communication channels to see
what is the atmosphere and attitude. I heard someone:
"I want to have en
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 22:42:24 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Couldn't we announce willingness (not formal plan) to provide the
> office suite for Tizen assuming this is rather little effort?
If Tizen ends up being a normal Linux distribution, maybe running Wayland and
even
includes Qt beca
On 30 September 2011 10:38, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 09/29/2011 10:42 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I've been following a bit the Tizen communication channels to see
> what is the atmosphere and attitude. I heard someone:
>
> "I want to have enough of freedom to run my Libreoffice o
On Friday 30 September 2011 Sep, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> 2) to get a HTML5 canvas backend done for Qt similar to what broadway
> does in GTK
Actually, that already worked after a fashion in February or even earlier. I've
seen Marijn demo Tables running in firefox
--
Boudewijn Rempt
http://www
On 09/29/2011 10:42 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
Hello,
I've been following a bit the Tizen communication channels to see
what is the atmosphere and attitude. I heard someone:
"I want to have enough of freedom to run my Libreoffice on the phone."
Couldn't we announce willingness (not formal pla
On 29 September 2011 23:12, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I've been following a bit the Tizen communication channels to see
>> what is the atmosphere and attitude. I heard someone:
>>
>> "I want to have enough of freedom to run my
On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been following a bit the Tizen communication channels to see
> what is the atmosphere and attitude. I heard someone:
>
> "I want to have enough of freedom to run my Libreoffice on the phone."
>
> Couldn't we announce will
Hello,
I've been following a bit the Tizen communication channels to see
what is the atmosphere and attitude. I heard someone:
"I want to have enough of freedom to run my Libreoffice on the phone."
Couldn't we announce willingness (not formal plan) to provide the
office suite for Tizen assuming
25 matches
Mail list logo
