On 16 November 2011 10:51, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Personnaly I agree with the graphical aspect of the logo (ie make sure the
> logo stands), one slight comment, you define a minimum size in centimeters,
> but
> that we might need a size definition for use on a screen (ie website).
>
> How
emoved in draft #4 since the planned distribution guidelines
were replaced by the new/reworked points 1-7 on page 3.
> www.calligra-suite.org/logo
> are currently not available. They should we there when the document is
> published.
This is a TODO as I said in the 'Calligra Brandin
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 13:15:11 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to say that unless there are other proposals we are not going
> to have a vote on license for the logo and the guidelines.
> Should you have any objections in these matters please do so before
> Monday, Nov 28th.
>
> T
On Tuesday 22 November 2011 22:23:11 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 22 November 2011 13:58, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 November 2011 13:15:11 you wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I'd like to say that unless there are other proposals we are not going
> >> to have a vote on license for the logo and the g
On 22 November 2011 13:58, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 November 2011 13:15:11 you wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'd like to say that unless there are other proposals we are not going
>> to have a vote on license for the logo and the guidelines.
>> Should you have any objections in these matters please do
Hi,
I'd like to say that unless there are other proposals we are not going
to have a vote on license for the logo and the guidelines.
Should you have any objections in these matters please do so before
Monday, Nov 28th.
The deadline does not mean corrections cannot be made - like
rephrasing or esp
Hello,
Updated draft #4 has been linked to
[1]
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Logos#The_Calligra_Suite_Logo_Usage_Guidelines
- Updates are explained at [2]
http://community.kde.org/Talk:Calligra/Logos#TODOs_3
- Also improved [3] http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Logos
Action point: we should
On 18 November 2011 12:35, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Friday 18 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> OK, Please see the change log at
>> http://community.kde.org/Talk:Calligra/Logos#TODOs_3
>>
>> Then, there's draft 3 and draft-with-changes-marked for review:
>> http://community.kde.org/
On Friday 18 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> OK, Please see the change log at
> http://community.kde.org/Talk:Calligra/Logos#TODOs_3
>
> Then, there's draft 3 and draft-with-changes-marked for review:
> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Logos#Calligra_Suite_Logo_Guidelines
>
> No gra
OK, Please see the change log at
http://community.kde.org/Talk:Calligra/Logos#TODOs_3
Then, there's draft 3 and draft-with-changes-marked for review:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Logos#Calligra_Suite_Logo_Guidelines
No graphics has been changed.
--
regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek
h
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Thus I'd like to ask if there are any objections to make the logo
> CC-BY-SA 3.0 -licensed and if there are, propose voting on the logo
> licensing and move to next tasks.
Yes, I am totally fine with that license.
--
Boudewijn Rempt
h
On 16 November 2011 19:31, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> Creativeness is of lower priority than visual identity to me. There's
>> nothing really wrong with more explicit message that that we wish to
>> maintain our visual identity. In some
On 16 November 2011 17:37, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 16 November 2011 13:35, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>>
>> >> But they do for Qt which has even more formal rules. Where do you see
>> >> the enforcement? The guidelines are for exactly
On 2011-11-16, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Well quiet curiously, I do think that the gnome guidelines are rather good
> (especially since they don't mix in the LGPL). And they cover aspects that
> are
> missing (ie like using the logo for books, journals/blogs). So yes, I have no
> objection
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Creativeness is of lower priority than visual identity to me. There's
> nothing really wrong with more explicit message that that we wish to
> maintain our visual identity. In some countries, especially the USA,
> public appearance of nonprof
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 16 November 2011 13:35, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
> >> But they do for Qt which has even more formal rules. Where do you see
> >> the enforcement? The guidelines are for exactly opposite reason: to
> >> limit risk of (usually unintent
On 16 November 2011 13:35, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> But they do for Qt which has even more formal rules. Where do you see
>> the enforcement? The guidelines are for exactly opposite reason: to
>> limit risk of (usually unintentional) fork of visual identity.
>>
>> Sometimes rules have to be expl
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Nobody should be worried because of the Distribution Guidelines -
> generic rules that all you would take for granted anyway (but it's
> easy to be surprised each time someone even unintentionally breaks the
> rules; something of this sort
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> But they do for Qt which has even more formal rules. Where do you see
> the enforcement? The guidelines are for exactly opposite reason: to
> limit risk of (usually unintentional) fork of visual identity.
>
> Sometimes rules have to be
On 16 November 2011 12:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Personnaly I agree with the graphical aspect of the logo (ie make sure the
>> logo stands), one slight comment, you define a minimum size in centimeters,
>> but
>> that
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Personnaly I agree with the graphical aspect of the logo (ie make sure the
> logo stands), one slight comment, you define a minimum size in centimeters,
> but
> that we might need a size definition for use on a screen (ie
On 16 November 2011 10:51, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Personnaly I agree with the graphical aspect of the logo (ie make sure the
> logo stands), one slight comment, you define a minimum size in centimeters,
> but
> that we might need a size definition for use on a screen (ie website).
Hi,
Personnaly I agree with the graphical aspect of the logo (ie make sure the
logo stands), one slight comment, you define a minimum size in centimeters, but
that we might need a size definition for use on a screen (ie website).
However, I am very skeptical about the where to use it part.
Loo
I'd just like to say that, until I say otherwise, I am fully behind Jaroslaw,
and you can count what he says as echoed by me.
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 23:04:40 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 15 November 2011 08:15, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wr
On 15 November 2011 08:15, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Saturday 12 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Presentation on branding we had today at the sprint:
>>
>> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Meetings/Fall_2011_meeting/Minutes#Branding
>>
>> Please discuss here about import
On Saturday 12 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hello,
> Presentation on branding we had today at the sprint:
>
> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Meetings/Fall_2011_meeting/Minutes#Branding
>
> Please discuss here about important things like terms of use of the
> logo in the context
On 12 November 2011 12:21, Mauro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> Please discuss here about important things like terms of use of the
>> logo in the context of the Calligra Project
>
> I am not an expert in digital rights and logo licensing, but I can't see
> why the "Avoid mistakes
Hello,
Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Please discuss here about important things like terms of use of the
> logo in the context of the Calligra Project
I am not an expert in digital rights and logo licensing, but I can't see
why the "Avoid mistakes" section is so restrictive.
> Do not incorporate th
Hello,
Presentation on branding we had today at the sprint:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Meetings/Fall_2011_meeting/Minutes#Branding
Please discuss here about important things like terms of use of the
logo in the context of the Calligra Project (not about logo as it's
already decided). The g
29 matches
Mail list logo
