On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 20:22:14 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> Currently I'm having my exams, will be free from Sunday, will continue
> working. Till then Thorsten has promised that he will look into why the
> presentation code doesn't actually show any slides.
I think I already told you what yo
On 26 April 2011 20:22, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> The two things I needed to copy were -
>
Thanks for the feedback.
> 1. the functions which detect presentation types from extensions, I think
> these should be static in KOAbstraction.
First thing first: is there reason we cannot have instance
The two things I needed to copy were -
1. the functions which detect presentation types from extensions, I think
these should be static in KOAbstraction.
2. the code which opens the documents (create a kodocument, do canvas magic
etc), sharing this wouldn't be straightforward as its different in Q
On 26 April 2011 09:34, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 21 April 2011 Apr, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
>> So to be clear, can the QML UI be built using KoAbstraction? The reason is
>> that I am already copying a lot of code from it, given that KoAbstraction
>> only helps to create QWidget base
One other thing on Calligra QML, or Calligra Active (Calligra Quick would be a
nice name as well...): the canvas controller implementation might perhaps be
part of the flake library, instead of the unfinished qgraphicswidget canvas
controller implementation in flake.
--
Boudewijn Rempt | http:
On Thursday 21 April 2011 Apr, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> So to be clear, can the QML UI be built using KoAbstraction? The reason is
> that I am already copying a lot of code from it, given that KoAbstraction
> only helps to create QWidget based UIs (correct me if I am wrong).
That sounds like t
Hi,
I get it now, just like Freoffice helped to create KoAbstraction, when we
are comfortable and sure with the QML UI's (code) design, we can move those
things to KoAbstraction and then use it from there. Sounds great to me :)
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Mani N C wrote:
> > So to be clea
> So to be clear, can the QML UI be built using KoAbstraction? The reason is
that I am already copying a lot of code from it, given that KoAbstraction
only helps to create QWidget based UIs (correct me if I > am wrong).
Yes atm, KoAbstraction is based on QWidget, But you can add the
QGraphicsWidge
On 21 April 2011 14:21, Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2011 09:35:37 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
>> On Thursday 21 April 2011, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
>> > Right now my code is not that modular, and I plan to do that once I
>> > understand how to properly use Calligra libs.
>> > On
On 21 April 2011 15:23, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> Hi Jaroslaw,
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>>
>> On 21 April 2011 09:35, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
>> > On Thursday 21 April 2011, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
>> >> Right now my code is not that modular, and I p
Hi Jaroslaw,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 21 April 2011 09:35, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 April 2011, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> >> Right now my code is not that modular, and I plan to do that once I
> >> understand how to properly use Call
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 09:35:37 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 21 April 2011, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> > Right now my code is not that modular, and I plan to do that once I
> > understand how to properly use Calligra libs.
> > Once that is done, we can have different UIs for dif
On 21 April 2011 09:35, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 21 April 2011, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
>> Right now my code is not that modular, and I plan to do that once I
>> understand how to properly use Calligra libs.
>> Once that is done, we can have different UIs for different form fac
Hi Mani,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Mani N C wrote:
> Good to hear that Plasma Active wants to showcase Calligra.
>
> If the Calligra Mobile doesn't break the desktop compilation, I would love
> to see it in tools directory. As Inge mentioned we can move it to other
> directory when Core/
On Thursday 21 April 2011, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> Right now my code is not that modular, and I plan to do that once I
> understand how to properly use Calligra libs.
> Once that is done, we can have different UIs for different form factors.
> But anyway, even if we have a mobile version for n
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestions.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott
wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2011, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> > I had some discussion with Inge over this (thanks Inge for the idea), and
> > we concluded that the current Calligra Mobile (formerly known a
On Wednesday 20 April 2011, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> I had some discussion with Inge over this (thanks Inge for the idea), and
> we concluded that the current Calligra Mobile (formerly known as
> Freoffice), is functional and robust, so it would not make sense to call
> the QML version as "Call
Good to hear that Plasma Active wants to showcase Calligra.
If the Calligra Mobile doesn't break the desktop compilation, I would love
to see it in tools directory. As Inge mentioned we can move it to other
directory when Core/UI separation is done.
I am ok with the "Calligra Active" name +1 from
On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 18:59:01 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not a very talkative person, so there aren't many mails to the ML, or
> posts on my blog/planet about stuff I've been doing lately, so here's a
> little intro (again ;) ) -
> I started developing a QML UI for Callig
Hi all,
I'm not a very talkative person, so there aren't many mails to the ML, or
posts on my blog/planet about stuff I've been doing lately, so here's a
little intro (again ;) ) -
I started developing a QML UI for Calligra under a university project funded
by Nokia this spring. As its been a QML
20 matches
Mail list logo
