Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-04 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Saturday 03 December 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > "Not supporting Qt5" is obviously suicidal, I did not propose to even > delay working on having the code build with it. > What I said that for cases where no important features new in Qt 5 are > used, there is no need to drop support for Qt 4

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-03 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Samstag 03 Dezember 2011 23:56:14 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > All minor uses of QT3SUPPORT in Kexi will be removed really soon. Only > complex code of tableview that depends on it still stays untouched > because it's tested for years with Qt 3 and Qt3 support and _is_ > stable. Well you could try

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-03 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 3 December 2011 23:31, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Friday 02 December 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> I am ok with this at the current stage. Porting should be careful, you >> know - Kexi 1.x on Qt 3 was way more stable, and in Qt 4 version we >> have almost no extra complicated features.

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-03 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Friday 02 December 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > I am ok with this at the current stage. Porting should be careful, you > know - Kexi 1.x on Qt 3 was way more stable, and in Qt 4 version we > have almost no extra complicated features. How about discussing about > a deadline for removal of Qt3S

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Friday 02 December 2011 Dec, Adam Pigg wrote: > thanks for the list of problem areas, even if we can't resolve then all in > kexi, I'll take a look at some to reduce the numbers The fewer instances of Qt3-compatibility code we have, the better :-) -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, ht

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 2 December 2011 16:49, Markus Slopianka wrote: > On Freitag 02 Dezember 2011 15:45:42 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > >> I'd like to see plans for backporting KDE 5 modules to currently used >> distros, let's say, all lines of Ubuntu 10.x. > > Already released distributions are in package / version f

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Adam Pigg
thanks for the list of problem areas, even if we can't resolve then all in kexi, I'll take a look at some to reduce the numbers -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 02/12/2011 8:25 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Thursday 01 December 2011 Dec, Jos van den Oever wrote: > Git commit aa83cf10c9031b8bb33bc191dbacf

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Freitag 02 Dezember 2011 15:45:42 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > I'd like to see plans for backporting KDE 5 modules to currently used > distros, let's say, all lines of Ubuntu 10.x. Already released distributions are in package / version freeze. No new packages will be introduced into standard r

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 2 December 2011 14:53, Markus Slopianka wrote: > On Freitag 02 Dezember 2011 11:25:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > >> We don't know how the KDE 5 will be deployed so would we have a >> transitional Calligra/Qt5 running on KDE/Qt4 before KDE/Qt5 arrives? > > There won't ever be a "KDE 5" because "K

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Freitag 02 Dezember 2011 11:25:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > We don't know how the KDE 5 will be deployed so would we have a > transitional Calligra/Qt5 running on KDE/Qt4 before KDE/Qt5 arrives? There won't ever be a "KDE 5" because "KDE" is not the name of software. KDE Frameworks 5 (KF5) wil

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 2 December 2011 10:26, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Friday 02 December 2011 Dec, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> On 2 December 2011 09:25, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> > On Thursday 01 December 2011 Dec, Jos van den Oever wrote: >> >> Git commit aa83cf10c9031b8bb33bc191dbacf9fab663d736 by Jos van den O

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Friday 02 December 2011 Dec, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 2 December 2011 09:25, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Thursday 01 December 2011 Dec, Jos van den Oever wrote: > >> Git commit aa83cf10c9031b8bb33bc191dbacf9fab663d736 by Jos van den Oever. > >> Committed on 01/12/2011 at 23:36. > >> Pushe

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 2 December 2011 09:25, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thursday 01 December 2011 Dec, Jos van den Oever wrote: >> Git commit aa83cf10c9031b8bb33bc191dbacf9fab663d736 by Jos van den Oever. >> Committed on 01/12/2011 at 23:36. >> Pushed by vandenoever into branch 'master'. >> >> Qt3Support is also ne

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-02 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thursday 01 December 2011 Dec, Jos van den Oever wrote: > Git commit aa83cf10c9031b8bb33bc191dbacf9fab663d736 by Jos van den Oever. > Committed on 01/12/2011 at 23:36. > Pushed by vandenoever into branch 'master'. > > Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra. Hm... We really have to get rid of th