On Saturday 03 December 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > "Not supporting Qt5" is obviously suicidal, I did not propose to even > delay working on having the code build with it. > What I said that for cases where no important features new in Qt 5 are > used, there is no need to drop support for Qt 4, especially if there > is evidence that Qt 4 support makes sense. Certain transitional period > when both are supported, (i.e. what you proposed) is a good idea, > consistent with what I said. Hope it's more clear now. Then we all agree. But you do have to realize that there is a point a time when the people who still want to support Qt4 will have to step in and do the maintenance work.
-- Cyrille Berger Skott _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
