Dear Calligra team,
we just got notified that the domain koffice.net is about to expire and has to
be renewed, and sysadmin asked the board whether the domain is still used.
Since KOffice has not been around for years now, we wonder if you still need
the old domain as a redirect to calligra.org,
Hi everyone,
to make sure there is nobody who hasn't learned about the KDE Mission survey,
I'm now writing to all devel lists of applications which I know are still
actively developed. I hope I've reached everybody now (if you know of an active
project which I might still not have reached, feel
On 14.03.2013 12:02, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 14 March 2013 10:07, Cyrille Berger wrote:
On 2013-03-14 09:36, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
In QML as we know, with proper separation of data structures (i.e.
when components do not interfere) it&#
On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 13 March 2013 19:56, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
Cool and sweet :)
Regarding splitting, I'd like to ask to discuss the following:
a QML app is typically consisted of many pages and uses the Loader
element to fully dynamically instantiate a component
On Thursday 14 March 2013 00:26:28 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the Calligra sprint last week, we were discussing over Calligra
> Active's future. One good thing that came along is that we started work on
> creating reusable Calligra QML components that can be used in isolation to
>
On 26.02.2013 17:40, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
I have mixed feelings when I think about having a touch UI for each of
the Calligra apps separately. On one side there are advantages that you
mentioned, but then it seems as if there will be too much work and/or
duplication. Again, I am not very su
On 28.01.2013 20:19, Inge Wallin wrote:
Regarding the main question... I'm not against the upping of the required KDE
version per se. But I'm a little worried about the general notion that you
need a late version of the OS to run a late version of an application. MS has
been so very successful
Hi,
as ingwa suggested, I have put a summary of the outcomes of our UI discussions
on IRC last Wednesday on the Wiki:
Suggestions for the tool options are here:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Usability_and_UX/Common/ToolOptionsSuggestions
I've put the suggestions regarding annotations directly
On Saturday 26 January 2013 09:42:57 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Yuë Liu wrote:
> > We talked about having a testing branch before commit into master
> > branch last year. We can restrict commit right to master, let the
> > features committed to and tested in testin
On 30.10.2012 12:54, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 Oct, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
On 30.10.2012 11:35, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 Oct, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
I had forgotten yet another welcome screen we've created, the one for Krita
Sketch:
On 30.10.2012 12:02, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 30 October 2012 11:28, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
I had forgotten yet another welcome screen we've created, the one for
Krita
Sketch: http://www.valdyas.org/~boud/krita_sketch_start.png.
I really like that one! It might be a bit too colorfu
On 30.10.2012 11:35, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 Oct, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
I had forgotten yet another welcome screen we've created, the one for Krita
Sketch: http://www.valdyas.org/~boud/krita_sketch_start.png.
I really like that one! It might be a bit too col
On 24.10.2012 13:27, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
The most important points are:
* Non-modal (although plenty of functionality may be unavailable until the
user engages with the dialog)
I'm not even really sure that's necessary if it's really easy to find the "Empty
document" option(s). If that one
On Monday 08 October 2012 02:29:02 Inge Wallin wrote:
> At 13th of April Boemann suggested an informal sprint to take care of the
> bugs in the calligracommons module since they "normally fall outside the
> itches each of us like to scratch".
>
> To make a long story short, this sprint happened be
gt; Characters
> >(it's obvious for non-techies that characters are not spaces, and the
> > the other value explicitly includes spaces)
>
> Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> - I guess 'East asian characters' is currently not visible by default (at
> least
rote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106252/
> ---
>
> (Updated Aug. 31, 2012, 12:19 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Calligra, Thom
I agree that
> > this group box seems unnecessary. The layout should be enough. Also if
> > there is any outer padding or margin, it could be set to something very
> > small.
>
> Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Oh, she forgot to attach the screenshot. It's here:
>
--
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106252/
> ---
>
> (Updated Aug. 31, 2012, 12:19 p.m.)
>
>
> Review req
> On Aug. 31, 2012, 6:25 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Screenshot: The layout
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org>
> >
> > Is it just the screenshot or does the icon have something other than
> > the wrench in it near the bottom)? If it does, it
it.
Screenshot: The layout
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org//r/106252/#scomment84>
Do the horizontal spacers between the different statistics adjust with the
docker's width?
If they are fixed, please make them dynamic. If they are already dynamic,
ignore this comment.
- Thomas
On Friday 31 August 2012 22:21:40 Shreya Pandit wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer
wrote:
> > On Friday 31 August 2012 18:14:50 Shreya Pandit wrote:
> > > Hey everyone :)
> > >
> > > I was wondering how about turn the left half of
On Friday 31 August 2012 10:24:32 C. Boemann wrote:
> > In regards to hiding titlebars: One thing to consider is that several
> > docks
> > use the titlebar also as the title for the dock, which means that hiding
> > the titlebar would mean you lose information in the GUI. So hiding
> > titlebars s
On Friday 31 August 2012 18:14:50 Shreya Pandit wrote:
> Hey everyone :)
>
> I was wondering how about turn the left half of the status bar ( that shows
> the page number, line number and document status) and the zoom widget into
> separate dockers, so that these and the statistics dock could be
>
On 29.08.2012 14:37, C. Boemann wrote:
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 11:27:55 Inge Wallin wrote:
I think that people would mostly put stuff there anyway that is very like
what we presentin the current status bar. So we could perhaps call the
lower dock widget position the "status bar" and have a s
On Thursday 23 August 2012 15:05:04 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 23.08.2012 14:53, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 August 2012 14:31:18 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >> while discussing the best way to implement the word count in the Author
> >
> On Aug. 28, 2012, 5:10 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > The layout as such works pretty well.
> > However the screenshot shows the problem boemann and boud mentioned about
> > placing dockers at the bottom: In their current design, they just have too
> > much
even more to
the height. If possible you should remove it.
- Thomas Pfeiffer
On Aug. 28, 2012, 4:41 p.m., Shreya Pandit wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard
On 23.08.2012 15:02, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 23 August 2012 14:45, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
On 23.08.2012 14:40, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 23 August 2012 14:31, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
Hi everyone,
while discussing the best way to implement the word count in the Author
UI,
I had an idea
On 23.08.2012 14:53, C. Boemann wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2012 14:31:18 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
Hi everyone,
while discussing the best way to implement the word count in the Author UI,
I had an idea for the Calligra UI in general.
Flexibility is one of the key advantages of the Calligra UI
On 23.08.2012 14:40, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 23 August 2012 14:31, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
Hi everyone,
while discussing the best way to implement the word count in the Author UI,
I had an idea for the Calligra UI in general.
Flexibility is one of the key advantages of the Calligra UI. One
Hi everyone,
while discussing the best way to implement the word count in the Author UI, I
had an idea for the Calligra UI in general.
Flexibility is one of the key advantages of the Calligra UI. One of the few UI
parts that are currently not flexible is the status bar. That's why I asked myself
Hello Boud,
On 21.08.2012 08:58, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Yeah, you didn't, and I did... Anyway, I'll drop the patch for komain and just
fix it for Krita myself.
wait, can we please not sacrifice a bit of Calligra's overall usability over a
dispute between two developers?
The rename is definit
On Saturday 18 August 2012 22:24:51 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > But an important one, and I'm thinking that if few people use this useful
> > option it's because they don't really know what it does. Clarifying that
> > would be a good thing, in my mind.>
> >> Please note it's already redundant bec
On 27.03.2012 11:34, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
Hi all,
since I'll be at Akademy the whole week, I was wondering if you are planning
to do a Calligra BoF there. Or if not, who will be there (since the Calligra
team tends a bit towards Northern E
Hi all,
since I'll be at Akademy the whole week, I was wondering if you are planning to
do a Calligra BoF there. Or if not, who will be there (since the Calligra team
tends a bit towards Northern Europe geographically, it's not a long trip for
many of you, right? ;) ). Since probably I won't ha
On Friday 25 November 2011 16:35:41 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> But then as Jaroslaw wrote we indeed could target way more users by
> providing more then one template. Think of one for designers, one for
> artists, etc. pp. We could then either ship with more then one (well, we
> already do but then
> On Oct. 17, 2011, 1:33 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > This is a very good idea for tabs with more than one element in them (e.g.
> > Text editing, References, Review).
> >
> > What it does not make sense for are those tabs that contain only one or two
> >
> On Oct. 16, 2011, 6:08 a.m., Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> > My biggest concern is about constiency between the different applications
> > changes with this patch. Would it not be better if that would be a common
> > option the user can select so all applications would behave like that?
>
> Cyr
still have those tools, we need to find a different place. But I
don't think they are of the same type as things like the text editing tab.
- Thomas Pfeiffer
On Oct. 15, 2011, 4:49 p.m., C. Boemann wrote:
>
> ---
> This
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:39:11 -0400, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
The goal of this project would be to create an interaction design
for creating and manipulating shapes. The start should be
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Usability_and_UX/Common/Dockers_vs_ToolOptions.
Thomas Pfeiffer can work
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:52:13 +0200, todd rme wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Inge Wallin
wrote:
Different types of tools aren't distinguishable
Some of our tools in the toolbox are primarily used to create new
data, e.g.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:18:48 +0200, Elvis Stansvik wrote:
2011/8/12 C. Boemann :
On Friday 12 August 2011 15:08:51 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Friday 12 August 2011 Aug, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Friday 12 August 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > For the text shape, in Stage and Words, no m
Hi Anna-Liisa,
the Calligra team has decided on the subject(s) for the usability test.
There are actually two topics that are currently actively discussed and where
a usability test would help a lot:
1. The tool and docker interaction
2. The application startup screen
If it was possible to test
> On Sunday 23 January 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > I think dockers are more intensively discussed these weeks, with some
> > code appearing here ant there. So the answer IMHO would be: dockers.
> > Regarding startup, asking them about the current startup dialog would
> > result in notes we al
> On 22 January 2011 16:48, todd rme wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Thomas Pfeiffer
wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> as those of you who have been on #calligra today probably already know,
> >> a group of students offered to do a usability test
Hi all,
as those of you who have been on #calligra today probably already know, a
group of students offered to do a usability test as a university project for
us.
The usbility tests would be conducted in March and the students promised to
have some results ready for our developer sprint in Apri
On Mo, 2010-12-27 at 18:44 +0100, Elvis Stansvik wrote:
> Yesterday an IRC meeting on the text styles UI was held. The results
> of the meeting are now up at [1].
>
> The results include a summary of the discussions, some preliminary
> mockups and a full IRC log.
>
Looks fine to me.
Regards,
Tho
> Alright, but then we're two against Cyrille ;) Preliminary date for
> the meeting is now instead:
>
> Monday 26/12, 20:00 CET.
> #calligra-styles-ui on Freenode
>
> If people have preferences, keep them coming. Let's say I'll announce
> the definitive date tomorrow at noon, based on preferences
48 matches
Mail list logo
