On 14.03.2013 12:02, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 14 March 2013 10:07, Cyrille Berger <cber...@cberger.net> wrote:
On 2013-03-14 09:36, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
In QML as we know, with proper separation of data structures (i.e.
when components do not interfere) it's possible to insert and "app"
within another "app" and that's almost for free.
That probably won't be used in Plasma Active for the above reasons,
but it's good that you have that flexibility, of course.
What Jaroslaw means is that you can have a single process "swap-in"
application, so you would get different UI for docs, sheets, presentations,
but all running in a single process.
In the end, it really is just an implementation detail, I guess the original
question is not whether we should have different processes, but if we should
separate the UI.
For separate UI - full agreement here - it's expected for reasons
already mentioned - different interaction methods for each
application.
In that case, it really doesn't matter to Plasma Active which way you
choose. As Marco Martin put it (but forgot to CC calligra-devel):
"as long as when one clicks on a file and gets it open in the right ui,
whatever of the two waysdoesn't really matter.
btw i think a sensible way would be putting all the "logic"
functionality (ho ui besides document rendering tough) in the
components, so in the end if is done in a single executable or multiple
metters even less"
Cheers,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
