Re: 2.9 Changelog

On 2015-02-25 15:13, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: Thanks. I have one question @Cyrille. Why are the previous binaries removed (not just 2.8.0 but also 2.8.6?). When moving to the next major release, I always only keep the last minor release of the previous one. The reason is to keep the mirrors small

Re: Review Request 122535: Initial port of koproperty to qt5

> On Feb. 23, 2015, 1:38 p.m., Jarosław Staniek wrote: > > Good! > > After rewriting history (src/ dir now exist, tests/ are now in examples/, > > etc.) I integrated your patch into the scratch repo (master) > > ssh://g...@git.kde.org/scratch/staniek/kproperty. > > > > Copy of the line style c

Re: Review Request 122153: KD Chart

> On Feb. 14, 2015, 5:32 p.m., Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > 3rdparty/kdchart/src/KDChartStockDiagram_p.cpp, line 293 > > > > > > `<= 360` or `< 360`? The KDChart 2.5.1 dump used for KDiagram has `< > > 36

Re: Review Request 122720: Fix crash on backward search

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122720/ --- (Updated Фев. 25, 2015, 3:55 п.п.) Review request for Calligra, Adam Pigg

Re: Re: Re: [Kexi-devel] RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

On Wednesday 25 February 2015 10:18:19 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, C. Boemann wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 10:01:16 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > >> > Applying full astyle is IMHO not OK, and even against efforts of > >> > everyone who keeps eye on proper coding style while

Review Request 122720: Fix crash on backward search

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122720/ --- Review request for Calligra, Adam Pigg, Jarosław Staniek, Radosław Wicik, a

Re: 2.9 Changelog

Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 15:57:48 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > On 24 February 2015 at 02:33, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > sadly, support for selecting text or > > clicking hyperlins is still missing, but no need to mention missing > > features > Is this a regression? If so, we'd like

Re: 2.9 Changelog

On 24 February 2015 at 02:33, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > sadly, support for selecting text or > clicking hyperlins is still missing, but no need to mention missing features Is this a regression? If so, we'd like to have known regressions listed somewhere (I am keeping them on the wiki). -

Re: Re: [Kexi-devel] RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Dmitry Kazakov wrote: Hi! My 2 cents :) 1) astyle Last time astyle was applied to Krita code (something around 2010-2011, it was applied partially?) I really didn't like the result. At least the thing it did with braces and indentation. I guess we just need to choose re

Re: Re: [Kexi-devel] RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

Hi! My 2 cents :) 1) astyle Last time astyle was applied to Krita code (something around 2010-2011, it was applied partially?) I really didn't like the result. At least the thing it did with braces and indentation. I guess we just need to choose really carefully what to change and what not. E.g.

Re: 2.9 Changelog

Thanks. I have one question @Cyrille. Why are the previous binaries removed (not just 2.8.0 but also 2.8.6?). Now users/packagers have no access to previous versions e.g. and links on previous announcements are now broken. This looks rather unprofessional. Apps such as KDevelop don't seem to do tha

Re: Re: [Kexi-devel] RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, C. Boemann wrote: On Wednesday 25 February 2015 10:01:16 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Applying full astyle is IMHO not OK, and even against efforts of > everyone who keeps eye on proper coding style while doing code > reviews. Sorry, our current code base is a mess. I don't ca

Re: Re: [Kexi-devel] RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

On Wednesday 25 February 2015 10:01:16 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > Applying full astyle is IMHO not OK, and even against efforts of > > everyone who keeps eye on proper coding style while doing code > > reviews. > > Sorry, our current code base is a mess. I don't care about kexi, and I > won't tou

Re: [Kexi-devel] RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 25 February 2015 at 01:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 09:47:41 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt: As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up step, but I'm not sure what the right moment or plac

Re: RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

On 25 February 2015 at 01:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 12:18:29 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >> On 24 February 2015 at 11:24, Mario Fux wrote: >> > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 08.51:56 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >> >> On 24 February 2015 at 03:55, Friedrich

Re: RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 09:47:41 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt: As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up step, but I'm not sure what the right moment or place is. It might even something to do in the 2.9 branch aft

Re: 2.9 Changelog

On Monday 23 February 2015 14:13:24 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Hello, > We would need to have the Calligra 2.9.0 change log within, preferably 24h. > > Most importantly I am asking the maintainers to send some story about > major news for 2.9. > More screenshots... On a side note, the tag is curre

Re: RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

On Wednesday 25 February 2015 01:01:57 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 09:47:41 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt: > > As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up step, > > but I'm not sure what the right moment or place is. It might even > > something