Review Request 109486: Improved handling of Kexi read-only mode

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109486/ --- Review request for Calligra, Oleg Kukharchuk, Adam Pigg, Dimitrios Tanis, an

Re: The future of Calligra Active

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Inge Wallin wrote: > On Thursday, March 14, 2013 09:36:46 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > On 13 March 2013 19:56, Shantanu Tushar Jha > wrote: > > > Cool and sweet :) > > > Regarding splitting, I'd like to ask to disc

Re: The future of Calligra Active

On Thursday, March 14, 2013 09:36:46 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > On 13 March 2013 19:56, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > > Cool and sweet :) > > Regarding splitting, I'd like to ask to discuss the following: > > a QML app is typically consisted of many pa

Re: The future of Calligra Active

On 14 March 2013 13:21, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 14.03.2013 12:02, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> >> On 14 March 2013 10:07, Cyrille Berger wrote: >>> >>> On 2013-03-14 09:36, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > In QML as we know, wi

Re: The future of Calligra Active

On 14.03.2013 12:02, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 14 March 2013 10:07, Cyrille Berger wrote: On 2013-03-14 09:36, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: In QML as we know, with proper separation of data structures (i.e. when components do not interfere) it's possi

Re: The future of Calligra Active

On 14 March 2013 10:07, Cyrille Berger wrote: > On 2013-03-14 09:36, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: >> >> On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >>> >>> In QML as we know, with proper separation of data structures (i.e. >>> when components do not interfere) it's possible to insert and "app" >>> with

Re: New release "layout": no more alpha, no more RC, just beta

On Thursday 14 March 2013 10:15:53 Cyrille Berger wrote: > Hi, > > As a reminder, our current layout is: > Week 0 -> tag alpha > Week 3 -> branch and tag beta > Week 6 -> tag RC > Week 9 -> tag final > > After some discussions, it has been suggested to do the following > layout: > > Week 3 -> br

Re: New release "layout": no more alpha, no more RC, just beta

On Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:15:53 Cyrille Berger wrote: > Hi, > > As a reminder, our current layout is: > Week 0 -> tag alpha > Week 3 -> branch and tag beta > Week 6 -> tag RC > Week 9 -> tag final > > After some discussions, it has been suggested to do the following > layout: > > Week 3 ->

Re: Review Request 109393: a new library for traversing odf files and a new export filter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109393/#review29175 --- filters/libodftraverse/OdfParser.h

New release "layout": no more alpha, no more RC, just beta

Hi, As a reminder, our current layout is: Week 0 -> tag alpha Week 3 -> branch and tag beta Week 6 -> tag RC Week 9 -> tag final After some discussions, it has been suggested to do the following layout: Week 3 -> branch and tag beta 1 Week 6 -> tag beta 2 Week 9 -> tag final The rational was

Re: The future of Calligra Active

On 2013-03-14 09:36, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: In QML as we know, with proper separation of data structures (i.e. when components do not interfere) it's possible to insert and "app" within another "app" and that's almost for free. That probably won't b

Re: The future of Calligra Active

On 13.03.2013 21:28, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 13 March 2013 19:56, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: Cool and sweet :) Regarding splitting, I'd like to ask to discuss the following: a QML app is typically consisted of many pages and uses the Loader element to fully dynamically instantiate a component