Re: Review Request: GSoC: Stage: Shape animations docker with no editable information (yet) and shape animations preview

2012-06-17 Thread Thorsten Zachmann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105213/#review14819 --- Some questions I have about the implementation: - What is the

Re: Review Request: GSoC: Stage: Shape animations docker with no editable information (yet) and shape animations preview

2012-06-17 Thread Paul Mendez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105213/ --- (Updated June 18, 2012, 12:53 a.m.) Review request for Calligra. Changes

Re: Please check your group on sprints.kde.org

2012-06-17 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Hi Mario, On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Mario Fux wrote: > Good morning > > The budget and email to the board is almost ready to be sent and thus we can > start waiting for approval of this big sprint and budget. > > In the meantime I was notified about the fact that it makes sense to check t

Re: features progress list

2012-06-17 Thread Markus
Am Sonntag 17 Juni 2012, 12:51:54 schrieb C. Boemann: > And since I use it for Words, lib, plugins and the features I work on, I > don't want to carry around a lot of cruft, making it hard to use this page > in a fast efficient manner. Why not use Bugzilla as Martin Gräßlin explained in his "bko"

Please check your group on sprints.kde.org

2012-06-17 Thread Mario Fux
Good morning The budget and email to the board is almost ready to be sent and thus we can start waiting for approval of this big sprint and budget. In the meantime I was notified about the fact that it makes sense to check the groups. As you see on the sprints.kde.org page [1] the amount of tra

Re: List of missing icons around 2.5 branching

2012-06-17 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 17 June 2012 05:40, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: [..] > Below the list which is currently created by my script. But I added also some > comments. Its not sorted, but maintainers surely will see where their code is > affected. Some missing icons are known, others may not. > [..] Dear Friedr

Re: Review Request: Fix some icon names to reference existing icons (2.5 branch)

2012-06-17 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105284/ --- (Updated June 17, 2012, 8:54 p.m.) Review request for Calligra. Changes

Review Request: Fix some icon names to reference existing icons (2.5 branch)

2012-06-17 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105284/ --- Review request for Calligra. Description --- Fixes all those icon nam

Re: Calligra 2.5 has been branched

2012-06-17 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
2.5 Beta tag is now set on 59c579f07fb69c06436a80bed3561e10592b -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

features progress list

2012-06-17 Thread C. Boemann
Hi We have the http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.5/Feature_Plan and Cyrille has suggested that we move to not have one page per version, but instead have an extra column for the targeted version. His suggestion also has a column for showing a possible public branch. Here is the link