Re: Patch for msoscheme

Hi Matus, Thanks for reviewing my patch. I got this file in internet and saved it in my Google Docs folder and downloaded it from Google docs. I did not try out this file with 2007 but in 2010 was able to open this file with some extra blank slides added to it. BTW LibreOffice opened this file

Review Request: line heights of empty lines

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103664/ --- Review request for Calligra. Description --- Before newyear i removed

RE: Patch for msoscheme

A more detailed comment to point 1: You mixed the MouseClickTextInfo, which is part of the TextContainerInteractiveInfo structure (our own structure to keep related information together) into a top level structure which purpose is to store a reference to text of the slide and it's padding, ind

Re: Review Request: tables documentation update for 2.4

> On Jan. 3, 2012, 10:59 a.m., Burkhard Lück wrote: > > doc/tables/functions.docbook, lines 1-10 > > > > > > I need some input here > > Burkhard Lück wrote: > Is functions.docbook what Tables Maintainer(s) want?

Re: Review Request: tables documentation update for 2.4

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103614/#review9664 --- Ship it! I didn't entirely read through all the changes, but in

Re: Review Request: tables documentation update for 2.4

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103614/#review9663 --- Ship it! I didn't entirely read through all the changes, but in

RE: Patch for msoscheme

Hi Mani, I'm not happy about that patch (check the reasons below). Do you know which application produced that file? PowerPoint 2007 classified your test file as corrupt and displayed only a number of slides. PowerPoint 2003 did not complain (it usually does not complain ) but I don't know i

Re: Build error due to docs

Am Montag, 9. Januar 2012, 16:24:28 schrieb Thorsten Zachmann: > Hello, > > I have the following build error since I updated today. It still compiled > yesterday without problems. > > [ 0%] Built target TestKoUnit_automoc > index.docbook:24: parser error : Entity 'calligra' not defined > in

Re: Build error due to docs

написане Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:12:05 +0200, Jaroslaw Staniek : yes, I did ask you for that ;) Done. ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: Build error due to docs

yes, I did ask you for that ;) On 09/01/2012, Yuri Chornoivan wrote: > написане Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:24:28 +0200, Thorsten Zachmann > : > >> Hello, >> >> I have the following build error since I updated today. It still compiled >> yesterday without problems. >> >> [ 0%] Built target TestKoUnit_au

Re: Build error due to docs

On Monday 09 January 2012 16:39:22 Yuri Chornoivan wrote: > написане Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:24:28 +0200, Thorsten Zachmann > > : > > Hello, > > > > I have the following build error since I updated today. It still compiled > > yesterday without problems. > > > > [ 0%] Built target TestKoUnit_automo

Re: Build error due to docs

написане Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:24:28 +0200, Thorsten Zachmann : Hello, I have the following build error since I updated today. It still compiled yesterday without problems. [ 0%] Built target TestKoUnit_automoc index.docbook:24: parser error : Entity 'calligra' not defined in the &calligr

Build error due to docs

Hello, I have the following build error since I updated today. It still compiled yesterday without problems. [ 0%] Built target TestKoUnit_automoc index.docbook:24: parser error : Entity 'calligra' not defined in the &calligra; productivity suite. ^ index.docbook:42: pa