Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Thus I'd like to ask if there are any objections to make the logo > CC-BY-SA 3.0 -licensed and if there are, propose voting on the logo > licensing and move to next tasks. Yes, I am totally fine with that license. -- Boudewijn Rempt h

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On 16 November 2011 19:31, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> Creativeness is of lower priority than visual identity to me. There's >> nothing really wrong with more explicit message that that we wish to >> maintain our visual identity. In some

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On 16 November 2011 17:37, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> On 16 November 2011 13:35, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> >> >> But they do for Qt which has even more formal rules. Where do you see >> >> the enforcement? The guidelines are for exactly

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On 2011-11-16, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Well quiet curiously, I do think that the gnome guidelines are rather good > (especially since they don't mix in the LGPL). And they cover aspects that > are > missing (ie like using the logo for books, journals/blogs). So yes, I have no > objection

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Creativeness is of lower priority than visual identity to me. There's > nothing really wrong with more explicit message that that we wish to > maintain our visual identity. In some countries, especially the USA, > public appearance of nonprof

Re: [calligra] plan/libs/ui: Remove depreciated KABC, use akonadi.

Hi, I get the following compilation error with KDE 4.4 : http://my.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?buildid=259809 On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Dag Andersen wrote: > Git commit 7f6682e4db13adbd6ad7e2b7f83f02bc5b5b48bb by Dag Andersen. > Committed on 16/11/2011 at 15:10. > Pushed by danders into bra

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 16 November 2011 13:35, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > >> But they do for Qt which has even more formal rules. Where do you see > >> the enforcement? The guidelines are for exactly opposite reason: to > >> limit risk of (usually unintent

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On 16 November 2011 13:35, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> But they do for Qt which has even more formal rules. Where do you see >> the enforcement? The guidelines are for exactly opposite reason: to >> limit risk of (usually unintentional) fork of visual identity. >> >> Sometimes rules have to be expl

[Junior Jobs] Proofreading in Kexi and plugins

Hi, Added a junior job offer: http://community.kde.org/Kexi/Junior_Jobs#Proofreading if someone is interested, please reply. -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek  http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek  Kexi & Calligra (kexi-project.org, identi.ca/kexi, calligra-suite.org)  KDE Software Develop

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On Tuesday 15 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Nobody should be worried because of the Distribution Guidelines - > generic rules that all you would take for granted anyway (but it's > easy to be surprised each time someone even unintentionally breaks the > rules; something of this sort

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > But they do for Qt which has even more formal rules. Where do you see > the enforcement? The guidelines are for exactly opposite reason: to > limit risk of (usually unintentional) fork of visual identity. > > Sometimes rules have to be

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On 16 November 2011 12:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Personnaly I agree with the graphical aspect of the logo (ie make sure the >> logo stands), one slight comment, you define a minimum size in centimeters, >> but >> that

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On Wednesday 16 November 2011 Nov, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Hi, > > Personnaly I agree with the graphical aspect of the logo (ie make sure the > logo stands), one slight comment, you define a minimum size in centimeters, > but > that we might need a size definition for use on a screen (ie

Re: Review Request: Added clearProperties function to the KoGenStyle class.

> On Nov. 15, 2011, 8:28 p.m., Jarosław Staniek wrote: > > libs/odf/KoGenStyle.h, line 318 > > > > > > removeAllProperties() is more in sync with Qt (which has over 15 > > removeAll*() methods) Yes, removeAllPrope

RE: [rant] Target audience for calligra-suite.org

Hi, I'm always a bit scared when I see the banner with pictures on [1]. Hehe. The graphic part desperately needs help, pictures make most of the impression on users and guests. I'm not a graphics guy otherwise I would offer my help. :) [1] http://www.calligra-suite.org/news/beta-3-packaging-upd

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

On 16 November 2011 10:51, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Hi, > > Personnaly I agree with the graphical aspect of the logo (ie make sure the > logo stands), one slight comment, you define a minimum size in centimeters, > but > that we might need a size definition for use on a screen (ie website).

Re: Calligra Branding Presentation & Draft of Guidelines

Hi, Personnaly I agree with the graphical aspect of the logo (ie make sure the logo stands), one slight comment, you define a minimum size in centimeters, but that we might need a size definition for use on a screen (ie website). However, I am very skeptical about the where to use it part. Loo

Re: [rant] Target audience for calligra-suite.org

On Tuesday 15 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 15 November 2011 20:24, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > Hi, > > > > calligra.org (not anymore calligra-suite.orgt ;P) is our front page for > > our users, right ? Then we have to identify our current users and the > > one we are targetting

Re: Voting for the best name for the Caligra Spreadsheet Application

Hi, I would like to vote. Please send me the link. Smit Patel ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel