On Saturday 12 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hello,
> Presentation on branding we had today at the sprint:
>
> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Meetings/Fall_2011_meeting/Minutes#Branding
>
> Please discuss here about important things like terms of use of the
> logo in the context
On Monday 14 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hi,
> Congratulations and thanks for organizers of the Sprint and thanks to
> attendees - _you_ are Calligra!
> Because Calligra project is so ambitious plans we covered only some of
> topics and would need extra week or more.
>
> One thing
On 11/14/2011 09:54 PM, Adam Pigg wrote:
On a similar note, imagine the possibility of embedding JS in a
document, and defining a function such as
function calligra_version() { return "2.6"; }
then, having some kind of user field that contained
'=calligra_version()' that would display the app
On 11/14/2011 10:13 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 14 November 2011 21:30, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 11/14/2011 01:51 PM, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
Background: I indeed think that is a rather important feature
cause it's the only way to get content into a document that
can be in a centralized w
On Monday 14 November 2011 23:44:27 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 14 November 2011 23:02, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> > On Sonntag 13 November 2011 12:39:02 C. Boemann wrote:
> >> RoadMap
> >>
> >> The goal is to be ready for 2.6 for regular usage without having all the
> >> more special
On 14 November 2011 23:02, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> On Sonntag 13 November 2011 12:39:02 C. Boemann wrote:
>
>> RoadMap
>>
>> The goal is to be ready for 2.6 for regular usage without having all the
>> more special features that are just nice-to-have.
>>
>> Qt 5 patches (boemann, pie
On Sonntag 13 November 2011 12:39:02 C. Boemann wrote:
> RoadMap
>
> The goal is to be ready for 2.6 for regular usage without having all the
> more special features that are just nice-to-have.
>
> Qt 5 patches (boemann, pierreSt)
With Calligra also being an engine provider for othe
On 14 November 2011 22:49, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> On Montag 14 November 2011 21:06:12 C. Boemann wrote:
>
>> Just to get it straight - it's not possible to add new suggestions to the
>> vote
>>
>> but Abacus is one of the choices
>
> Wow, now we know Abacus and Tables.
> I mean, I at least some
On Montag 14 November 2011 21:06:12 C. Boemann wrote:
> Just to get it straight - it's not possible to add new suggestions to the
> vote
>
> but Abacus is one of the choices
Wow, now we know Abacus and Tables.
I mean, I at least somehow get why one might not let any random person vote but
why a
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 21:37, C. Boemann wrote:
...
> So at the Calligra Sprint we brainstormed about it and I've set up a
> condorcet vote for it (including the option of keeping "Tables"). Please
> note that this is still just a suggestion to Marijn who will make the final
> decision.
>
> Reply
On 14 November 2011 21:30, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 01:51 PM, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
>
> Background: I indeed think that is a rather important feature
> cause it's the only way to get content into a document that
> can be in a centralized way edited/updated. Means you for
> example
On 14 November 2011 21:54, Adam Pigg wrote:
> On a similar note, imagine the possibility of embedding JS in a document,
> and defining a function such as
> function calligra_version() { return "2.6"; }
> then, having some kind of user field that contained '=calligra_version()'
> that would displa
On a similar note, imagine the possibility of embedding JS in a document,
and defining a function such as
function calligra_version() { return "2.6"; }
then, having some kind of user field that contained '=calligra_version()'
that would display the appropriate content/
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8
On 14 November 2011 21:07, Jaime wrote:
> What about Kalkul? it even uses K everywhere, as in the old days. :-)
Sorry, but the voting has started. Set of names is closed, or the
votes would make no sense.
And let's not start K vs C letter discussion _here_ :)
--
regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw S
Hi,
Congratulations and thanks for organizers of the Sprint and thanks to
attendees - _you_ are Calligra!
Because Calligra project is so ambitious plans we covered only some of
topics and would need extra week or more.
One thing not covered is web site. It is sad to admit but
calligra-suite.org qu
On 11/14/2011 01:51 PM, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
Background: I indeed think that is a rather important feature
cause it's the only way to get content into a document that
can be in a centralized way edited/updated. Means you for
example a document describing the features of Call
What about Kalkul? it even uses K everywhere, as in the old days. :-)
2011/11/14 Markus Slopianka :
> While I'm usually in favor of using Esperanto, "Kalkultabelo" isn't a handy
> word.
> https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalkultabelo
Thanks, I didn't realize there is an Esperanto wikipedia.
___
On Monday 14 November 2011 21:03:09 Mauro wrote:
> I'd like to share with you two names that just came to my mind:
>
> * tabella/tabellae/tabulae [1]
> Latin for table(s)
> * abacus
> well known simple calculating tool
>
> What's your opinion?
>
> I'm not a contributor, so maybe I do
I'd like to share with you two names that just came to my mind:
* tabella/tabellae/tabulae [1]
Latin for table(s)
* abacus
well known simple calculating tool
What's your opinion?
I'm not a contributor, so maybe I don't qualify, but I would like to be
able to vote.
[1] I can't give y
While I'm usually in favor of using Esperanto, "Kalkultabelo" isn't a handy
word.
https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalkultabelo
On Montag 14 November 2011 10:43:32 Jaime wrote:
> I know you all remember all the spreadsheets names already used, but
> as a reminder:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spr
2011/11/14 Cyrille Berger Skott :
> On Monday 14 November 2011, Vít Pelčák wrote:
>> What would you say on Spreadator?
> Sounds a bit agressive ;) (Predator)
Yep. Numbers n shit is way more appropriate ;-)
> --
> Cyrille Berger Skott
> ___
> calligra-de
On Monday 14 November 2011 18:52:03 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Monday 14 November 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> > > Reply to me or to the mailing list if you would like to be able to
> > > vote, I'll then send you a personal invitation.
> >
> > I think the vote should be public to everyon
On Monday 14 November 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> > Reply to me or to the mailing list if you would like to be able to vote,
> > I'll then send you a personal invitation.
>
> I think the vote should be public to everyone in the community and not
> secrete as it seems to be now
Usually, havin
On Monday 14 November 2011, Vít Pelčák wrote:
> What would you say on Spreadator?
Sounds a bit agressive ;) (Predator)
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
>
> Background: I indeed think that is a rather important feature
> cause it's the only way to get content into a document that
> can be in a centralized way edited/updated. Means you for
> example a document describing the features of Calligra as
> released and then add a user-variable field for t
I know you all remember all the spreadsheets names already used, but
as a reminder:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spreadsheet
Calligra comes from Calligraphy.. Is there a similar process for the
world spreadsheet, in English or Greek or Esperanto, or another
language? It is Tabellen in esperant
Hi, this is the agenda + notes we used during the meeting. I've slightly
cleaned up. We didn't take a lot of notes, though...
Agenda
09:00 Meeting
User Interface "rules" (ingwa)
* can apps define their gui on their own, or should they be part of the
suite?
* when words's gui was redone
On 14 November 2011 05:27, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> On Sunday, November 13, 2011 21:37:18 C. Boemann wrote:
>> Several of us would like a better name for the Tables Application
>>
>> Reason is that "tables" is too often misunderstood with text tables or kexi
>> tables. and having to say Calligra
28 matches
Mail list logo