Re: Review Request: Rectangular and square gradient support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102780/#review7173 --- libs/flake/KoColorBackground.h

Re: on Words

On Friday 07 October 2011 21:30:47 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote: > I can take on responsibility for animating this session too if you want. ... > As far as I know there is already a session planned that I'll animate on > this very topic. ... > PierreSt Yes I know we had discussed some of the things b

Re: comparing rendering of text documents

On Friday, October 07, 2011 22:29:37 PM Jos van den Oever wrote: > On Friday, October 07, 2011 21:42:58 PM lassi.ta.niemi...@nokia.com wrote: > > Really nice! > > Thanks! > Nice to read a 'Lassi is still alive!' :-) > How are you doing? > This is nokia internal doc set: > http://oeba.nl/documents/

Re: comparing rendering of text documents

On Friday, October 07, 2011 21:42:58 PM lassi.ta.niemi...@nokia.com wrote: > Really nice! One thing I forgot to mention: alt-mousewheel zooms in/out and to run the script you also need xephyr. Cheers, Jos ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@k

Re: comparing rendering of text documents

On Friday, October 07, 2011 21:42:58 PM lassi.ta.niemi...@nokia.com wrote: > Really nice! Thanks! Nice to read a 'Lassi is still alive!' :-) How are you doing? This is nokia internal doc set: http://oeba.nl/documents/ It's still building, 60% done Cheers, Jos > __

RE: comparing rendering of text documents

Really nice! From: calligra-devel-boun...@kde.org [calligra-devel-boun...@kde.org] on behalf of ext Jos van den Oever [jos.van.den.oe...@kogmbh.com] Sent: 07 October 2011 19:57 To: calligra-devel@kde.org Subject: Re: comparing rendering of text documents O

Re: on Words

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:39 PM, C. Boemann wrote: > Hi fellow Words developers > > The sprint is nearing and I think it's time to start thinking about what we > should do. The following is up for discussion at the sprint but I'd like to > get a head start: > > Mission statement >

Re: New logo

On 7 October 2011 14:05, C. Boemann wrote: > On Friday 07 October 2011 12:40:11 Markus Slopianka wrote: >> Which license is that logo under? Is it standard Oxygen Icons licensing >> (=LGPL to allow embedding it into GPL apps), is it CC-BY-SA, or anything >> else (LGPL+CC dual licensing for example

Re: comparing rendering of text documents

On Friday, October 07, 2011 18:50:36 PM Jos van den Oever wrote: > Hi guys, > > I wrote some script to create html pages that compare rendering by > libreoffice and calligra. > > Some example results can be found at http://oeba.nl/odf/ > http://oeba.nl/docx Left is LibreOffice, right is Calligra

Re: New logo

On Thursday 06 October 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 6 October 2011 21:48, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > I am ok with it, on a side note, could probably be merged with our > > previous discussion on the use of calligra name: > > > > http://lists.kde.org/?t=129478490400047&r=1&w=2 > > Yes,

Re: New logo

I think the guideline shows how to integrate text, with logo. Look at the top. Otherwise, I agree with Casper we should not overdo it. On Friday 07 October 2011, Inge Wallin wrote: > On Thursday, October 06, 2011 18:38:23 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > here is the logo Eugene ha

Re: New logo

On Donnerstag 06 Oktober 2011 19:20:26 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > Exactly what I was waiting for, can I put this in About screen of Calligra > Active ? No. C. Boemann said that the logo is currently not freely licensed which makes it non- compliant with paragraphs 4, 5, 7, and 10 of http://te

Re: New logo

On Freitag 07 Oktober 2011 14:05:39 C. Boemann wrote: > For now assume it's Eugenes sole property. We would probably choose a quite > restrictive licence like firefox. I know this might be a problem with > debian[1] but i don't think it can be any other way if we want to protect > our brand. You

Re: New logo

On Friday 07 October 2011 12:40:11 Markus Slopianka wrote: > Which license is that logo under? Is it standard Oxygen Icons licensing > (=LGPL to allow embedding it into GPL apps), is it CC-BY-SA, or anything > else (LGPL+CC dual licensing for example)? > > On Donnerstag 06 Oktober 2011 18:38:23 Th

on Words

Hi fellow Words developers The sprint is nearing and I think it's time to start thinking about what we should do. The following is up for discussion at the sprint but I'd like to get a head start: Mission statement Inspired by Krita we should come up with a mission stat

Re: New logo

Which license is that logo under? Is it standard Oxygen Icons licensing (=LGPL to allow embedding it into GPL apps), is it CC-BY-SA, or anything else (LGPL+CC dual licensing for example)? On Donnerstag 06 Oktober 2011 18:38:23 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > Hello all, > > here is the logo Eugene

Re: New logo

On 10/06/2011 10:08 PM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: Hello all, here is the logo Eugene has worked on for us. He took our comments and new we can see the result here. That is the time for final comments and praise. I hope all are satisfied with the result. Thorsten ___

Re: New logo

On Friday 07 October 2011 08:58:10 Inge Wallin wrote: > On Thursday, October 06, 2011 18:38:23 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > here is the logo Eugene has worked on for us. He took our comments and > > new we can see the result here. That is the time for final comments and > > prai

Re: New logo

On 7 October 2011 08:58, Inge Wallin wrote: > On Thursday, October 06, 2011 18:38:23 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> here is the logo Eugene has worked on for us. He took our comments and new >> we can see the result here. That is the time for final comments and >> praise. I hope all