On Thursday, January 13, 2011 07:43:36 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a new contributor to Calligra and was trying to resolve
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=260516 . I found while discussing on
> IRC that the feature is already implemented, and only configuration options
> are
Hi,
I am a new contributor to Calligra and was trying to resolve
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=260516 . I found while discussing on
IRC that the feature is already implemented, and only configuration options
are missing in Words (but are present in Stage, Tables etc).
Now, If I try to a
Recently I'm busy with my final exams and didn't commit to calligra. I
can come back at 18th, I prefer more extra time so that I can make
Flow at least usable for basic operations in 2.4.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott
wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote
On 12 January 2011 20:32, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
>> On Wednesday 12 January 2011 20:09:59 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Time to work on a release schedule for the firs
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 20:41:27 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011 20:32:04 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > We could go with a really long and relaxed beta period :-)
> >
> > could work, with a bit of enhanced publicity
>
>
On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:19:40 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > KOffice used to be a member of the Dutch OpenDoc society, and Calligra has
> > just been invited. The cost is negligable at a very fair 0 euros for open
> > source proj
On Wednesday 12 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011 20:32:04 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > We could go with a really long and relaxed beta period :-)
> could work, with a bit of enhanced publicity
Another option could be to go to a fast & furious two month schedule to sho
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 20:32:04 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011 20:09:59 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Time to work on a release sche
On Wednesday 12 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011 20:09:59 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Time to work on a release schedule for the first calligra release, aka
> > > 2.4 (and not 1.0 :) ).
> >
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 20:09:59 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Time to work on a release schedule for the first calligra release, aka
> > 2.4 (and not 1.0 :) ).
> >
> > If we were to strictly follow our schedule, we would h
On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 12 January 2011 20:09, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Time to work on a release schedule for the first calligra release, aka 2.4
> >> (and not 1.0 :) ).
> >>
> >> If
On 12 January 2011 20:09, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Time to work on a release schedule for the first calligra release, aka 2.4
>> (and not 1.0 :) ).
>>
>> If we were to strictly follow our schedule, we would have schedule that l
On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Time to work on a release schedule for the first calligra release, aka 2.4
> (and not 1.0 :) ).
>
> If we were to strictly follow our schedule, we would have schedule that looks
> like this: (with year+1, ie 2010->2011)
>
> ht
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 16:41:55 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Time to work on a release schedule for the first calligra release, aka 2.4
> (and not 1.0 :) ).
>
> If we were to strictly follow our schedule, we would have schedule that
> looks like this: (with year+1, ie 2010->2011)
>
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:19:40 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> KOffice used to be a member of the Dutch OpenDoc society, and Calligra has
> just been invited. The cost is negligable at a very fair 0 euros for open
> source projects... And I would really like us to join! Any objections?
On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> > > I have already seen that one. But I have also seen on the dot comments
> > (in
> > > the article about KDE on windows
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> > I have already seen that one. But I have also seen on the dot comments
> (in
> > the article about KDE on windows) that calligra is not compiling and that
> > Boud is looking into
On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> I have already seen that one. But I have also seen on the dot comments (in
> the article about KDE on windows) that calligra is not compiling and that
> Boud is looking into this. I am interested in more calligra specific
> information.
My
I have already seen that one. But I have also seen on the dot comments (in
the article about KDE on windows) that calligra is not compiling and that
Boud is looking into this. I am interested in more calligra specific
information. Also, is Qt Creator a good solution for developing on windows?
Pier
Hi, I am back from holidays. I have for the moment problems with my
Virtualbox 4 installation which keeps crashing on me as soon as I push it a
bit. That means I'll have difficulties for reviewing the patch right now. I
am considering trying a development set-up on Windows until Virtualbox is
stabi
On 12 January 2011 10:28, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> KOffice used to be a member of the Dutch OpenDoc society, and Calligra has
>> just been invited. The cost is negligable at a very fair 0 euros for open
>> source projects... An
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 10:19:40 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> KOffice used to be a member of the Dutch OpenDoc society, and Calligra has
> just been invited. The cost is negligable at a very fair 0 euros for open
> source projects... And I would really like us to join! Any objections?
I w
Hi!
KOffice used to be a member of the Dutch OpenDoc society, and Calligra has just
been invited. The cost is negligable at a very fair 0 euros for open source
projects... And I would really like us to join! Any objections?
--
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org
--- B
23 matches
Mail list logo