Re: tightening mathjax tex options

On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 07:58:47AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > Oh, you’re right. I think I know why. Someone wants to use an really ancient > > version of texinfo (5.x) even though the official build says it should be at > > least 6.8. I tried to make it a requirement, but that didn’t work. I

Re: tightening mathjax tex options

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 07:31:27PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: > On 9/6/24 2:36 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 02:16:56PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: > > > On 9/6/24 9:29 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > The change in settings may only affect LaTeX rendered by MathJax outside >

Re: tightening mathjax tex options

On 9/6/24 2:36 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote: On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 02:16:56PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: On 9/6/24 9:29 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: The change in settings may only affect LaTeX rendered by MathJax outside of @math and @displaymath, using different structures as what is done in texi2an

Re: tightening mathjax tex options

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 02:16:56PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: > On 9/6/24 9:29 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > The change in settings may only affect LaTeX rendered by MathJax outside > > of @math and @displaymath, using different structures as what is done in > > texi2any. This would be possible if y

Re: texi2any export to html with static LaTeX

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 10:12:08PM +0100, Jeremy Bryant wrote: > Patrice Dumas writes: > > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 09:49:02PM +0100, Jeremy Bryant wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Version: texi2any (GNU texinfo) 7.1 > >> > >> This appears to depend on latex2html which appears not to be maintained

Re: tightening mathjax tex options

On 9/6/24 9:29 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 08:47:05AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: On 9/6/24 3:28 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: Hello, I propose to set the following in mathjax defaults, to avoid possible interactions with text (although it may not be possible anyway because of

Re: texi2any export to html with static LaTeX

Patrice Dumas writes: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 09:49:02PM +0100, Jeremy Bryant wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Version: texi2any (GNU texinfo) 7.1 >> >> This appears to depend on latex2html which appears not to be maintained. >> Is there a fix? > > You could try this patch and apply to $datadir/texinfo

Re: Build report for texinfo-7.1.0.91

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 12:47:46PM -0600, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: > The one complete failure was for MidnightBSD 3.0.0, released and > installed in March 2023. On that system, the libintl package is not > available, and compilation fails with > > parsetexi/api.c:33:10: fatal error: 'libin

Build report for texinfo-7.1.0.91

I have completed build attempts for texinfo-7.1.0.91 that cover several major Unix-family operating systems, and different CPU architectures (including both big- and little-endian), and got nearly perfect success, with 0 validation failures: builds succeeded on 55 of 58 systems. Two of the three f

Re: tightening mathjax tex options

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 08:47:05AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: > What are the current values for these? I’m most worried that if these are > different, you’ll break lots of existing uses. Maxima’s user manual > uses Mathjax a lot to get > nice HTML dis

Re: tightening mathjax tex options

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 08:47:05AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: > On 9/6/24 3:28 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I propose to set the following in mathjax defaults, to avoid possible > > interactions with text (although it may not be possible anyway because > > of ignoreHtmlClass set i

Re: tightening mathjax tex options

On 9/6/24 3:28 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: Hello, I propose to set the following in mathjax defaults, to avoid possible interactions with text (although it may not be possible anyway because of ignoreHtmlClass set in body), and perhaps simplifying the task of mathjax: tex: { processEscape

Re: removing border=0 for tables as it is the default

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 12:22:41PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > It seems that border=0 is the default for tables formatting in HTML, it > is not specified anywhere, but it has been like that for a long time, > therefore I propose to simply remove border=0 everywhere. > > Any oppositio

tightening mathjax tex options

Hello, I propose to set the following in mathjax defaults, to avoid possible interactions with text (although it may not be possible anyway because of ignoreHtmlClass set in body), and perhaps simplifying the task of mathjax: tex: { processEscapes: false, // use \$ to produce a literal

removing border=0 for tables as it is the default

Hello, It seems that border=0 is the default for tables formatting in HTML, it is not specified anywhere, but it has been like that for a long time, therefore I propose to simply remove border=0 everywhere. Any opposition? -- Pat

Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 12:29:55AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > I have not checked the thread, but I recall that the output we obtained > with only was not good, at least for some browser. I do not think > that we need to change to for epubcheck compliance, though. I only had partial recall, a

Re: texi2any export to html with static LaTeX

On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 09:49:02PM +0100, Jeremy Bryant wrote: > Hello, > > Version: texi2any (GNU texinfo) 7.1 > > This appears to depend on latex2html which appears not to be maintained. > Is there a fix? You could try this patch and apply to $datadir/texinfo/ext/latex2html.pm -- Pat diff --

Re: texi2any export to html with static LaTeX

Hello, On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 09:49:02PM +0100, Jeremy Bryant wrote: > Hello, > > Version: texi2any (GNU texinfo) 7.1 > > Goal: > The manual recommends a command like the following to export a .texi > file containing LaTeX to HTML: > > texi2any --html file1.texi -c HTML_MATH=l2h --split=none >