On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 07:31:27PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: > On 9/6/24 2:36 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 02:16:56PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: > > > On 9/6/24 9:29 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > The change in settings may only affect LaTeX rendered by MathJax outside > > > > of @math and @displaymath, using different structures as what is done in > > > > texi2any. This would be possible if you directly ouput HTML like > > > Ok, Maxima’s manual doesn’t do that. All math should be done my @math or > > > @displaymath. At least that’s how it’s supposed to be in the manual. > > But this means that (according to my reading of the HTML) you change the > > output somehow to be directly > > $ > > ... > > $ > Oh, you’re right. I think I know why. Someone wants to use an really ancient > version of texinfo (5.x) even though the official build says it should be at > least 6.8. I tried to make it a requirement, but that didn’t work.
If you use 5.x, indeed, you have to add MathJax support by yourself. > > for displaymath, without the expected <div><em>, and use $ instead of > > \[. Similarly, @math does not have <em>. The MathJax block in the > > header is also missing, as well as the tex2jax_ignore in <body>. > Does it matter that it was built with texinfo 6.8? (I think.) I haven’t > updated the site to use a newer version of texinfo, but I’d like to. No, the MathJax support was added in 6.8 and has not changed much until now. -- Pat
