Re: make compilation, libit's gettext

2000-05-18 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul D. Smith writes: > Bruno, do you have any thoughts on how we could _safely_ auto-detect a > "good" gettext implementation? I think it would be satisfactory to > detect a version of GNU gettext, and brand all other versions "bad", That's good enough, yes. You can detect GNU gettext by check

Re: make compilation, libit's gettext

2000-05-17 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Pinard?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: fp> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The default in make-3.79 -- borrowed from libit-0.7 -- is to *always* >> use the included gettext! fp> I'm ready to change the default, given that some clues are fp> auto-

Re: make compilation, libit's gettext

2000-05-03 Thread François Pinard
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The default in make-3.79 -- borrowed from libit-0.7 -- is to *always* > use the included gettext! I'm ready to change the default, given that some clues are auto-configured to discover that the installed gettext is better than the included one. Includin

make compilation, libit's gettext

2000-05-03 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, Compiling make-3.79 with a current glibc snapshot. glibc-2.2 will have new features in gettext: automatic conversion of the translation to the right charset, and plural handling. 1) The default in all normal programs using AM_GNU_GETTEXT is to use the included gettext only if the system doe