%% =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Pinard?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  fp> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  >> The default in make-3.79 -- borrowed from libit-0.7 -- is to *always*
  >> use the included gettext!

  fp> I'm ready to change the default, given that some clues are
  fp> auto-configured to discover that the installed gettext is better
  fp> than the included one.  Including the system's gettext by default
  fp> had created a lot of problems in the past, and I would not return
  fp> to these problems because some (still experimental) version is
  fp> better.  Also, GNU gettext should _also_ be updated, it has been
  fp> kind of put aside for `libc' work, and not everybody runs `libc'
  fp> (yet :-).

  >> 2) When I try --without-included-gettext, it doesn't even work!! It
  >> leads to link errors:

Hi.

I want to release a 3.79.1 soon to handle various issues that have
arisen with 3.79.

I'd really like to resolve this issue along with them.  This
conversation sort of died down, so I don't have a good view of the way
forward.

François, do you have any thoughts on why #2 above fails and how to fix
it?

Bruno, do you have any thoughts on how we could _safely_ auto-detect a
"good" gettext implementation?  I think it would be satisfactory to
detect a version of GNU gettext, and brand all other versions "bad",
rather than looking for specific features.  Is there a foolproof way to
detect the GNU gettext installation, maybe via some #define or
something?

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          Find some GNU make tips at:
 http://www.gnu.org                      http://www.ultranet.com/~pauld/gmake/
 "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist

Reply via email to