On 11/11/2017 19:40, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 14:30 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Another month, another email begging for an update??
>
> These changes have been pushed into the Git repository, thanks very
> much.
Thanks to you!
> I needed to adjust some of the unit tests whic
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 14:30 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Another month, another email begging for an update??
These changes have been pushed into the Git repository, thanks very
much.
I needed to adjust some of the unit tests which were impacted by the
changes to the hashing function.
Also, I n
On 22/09/2017 12:46, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 13:44, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Overall, they provide a 15% improvement for my favorite testcase (QEMU's
>> "no-op" build). These were first sent out last November, but there
>> have been quite a few changes since then:
>>
>> - I have droppe
> I'll need to think about the hash patches: the hash implementation in
> GNU make is taken pretty straightforwardly from id-utils. If we start
> to modify it significantly here we'd be cutting that relationship. That
> may be OK, but I'd need to think about it.
Maybe you want to backport those
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 13:44 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Overall, they provide a 15% improvement for my favorite testcase (QEMU's
> "no-op" build). These were first sent out last November, but there
> have been quite a few changes since then:
Hi Paolo. Thanks for these patches, they do look int
On 11/08/2017 13:44, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Overall, they provide a 15% improvement for my favorite testcase (QEMU's
> "no-op" build). These were first sent out last November, but there
> have been quite a few changes since then:
>
> - I have dropped the SSE-optimized replacement for strpbrk, bec
Overall, they provide a 15% improvement for my favorite testcase (QEMU's
"no-op" build). These were first sent out last November, but there
have been quite a few changes since then:
- I have dropped the SSE-optimized replacement for strpbrk, because
it does not provide any improvement when test
